Fontsere Claudia, Speak Samuel A, Caven Andrew J, Rodríguez Juan Antonio, Wang Xuejing, Pacheco Carolina, Cassatt-Johnstone Molly, Femerling Georgette, Maloney Brigid, Balacco Jennifer, Collins Joanna, Sims Ying, Abueg Linelle, Fedrigo Olivier, Jarvis Erich D, Hartup Barry K, Shapiro Beth, Gilbert M Thomas P, van Oosterhout Cock, Morales Hernán E
Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Mol Ecol. 2025 Dec;34(23):e70088. doi: 10.1111/mec.70088. Epub 2025 Aug 26.
Integrating in-situ (wild) and ex-situ (captive) conservation efforts can mitigate genetic diversity loss and help prevent extinction of endangered wild populations. The whooping crane (Grus americana) experienced severe population declines in the 18th century, culminating in a collapse to ~20 individuals by 1944. Legal protections and conservation actions have since increased the census population from a stock of 16 individuals to approximately 840 individuals, yet the impact on genomic diversity remains unclear. We analysed the temporal dynamics of genomic erosion by sequencing a high-quality reference genome, and re-sequencing 16 historical (years 1867-1893) and 37 modern (2007-2020) genomes, including wild individuals and four generations of captive-bred individuals. Genomic demographic reconstructions reveal a steady decline, accelerating over the past 300 years with the European settlement of North America. Temporal genomic analyses show that despite demographic recovery, the species has lost 70% of its historical genetic diversity and has increased its inbreeding. Although the modern population bottleneck reduced the ancestral genetic load, modern populations possess more realised load than masked load, possibly resulting in a chronic loss of fitness. Integrating pedigree and genomic data, we underscore the role of breeding management in reducing recent inbreeding. Yet ongoing heterozygosity loss, load accumulation, and persistent effects of historical inbreeding (i.e., background inbreeding) argue against the species' downlisting from its current Endangered status on the IUCN Red List and the Endangered Species Act. The presence of private genetic variation in wild and captive populations suggests that wild-captive crosses could enhance genetic diversity and reduce the realised load. Our findings emphasise the role of genomics in informing conservation management and policy.
整合原地(野生)和迁地(圈养)保护措施可以减轻遗传多样性丧失,并有助于防止濒危野生种群灭绝。美洲鹤(Grus americana)在18世纪经历了严重的种群数量下降,到1944年种群数量锐减至约20只。自那时起,法律保护和保护行动使普查种群数量从16只增加到了约840只,但对基因组多样性的影响仍不清楚。我们通过对一个高质量参考基因组进行测序,并对16个历史时期(1867 - 1893年)和37个现代时期(2007 - 2020年)的基因组进行重测序,包括野生个体和四代圈养繁殖个体,分析了基因组侵蚀的时间动态。基因组人口统计学重建显示,自北美被欧洲人殖民以来,过去300年里种群数量稳步下降且加速。时间基因组分析表明,尽管种群数量有所恢复,但该物种已丧失了70%的历史遗传多样性,且近亲繁殖有所增加。尽管现代种群瓶颈减少了祖先遗传负荷,但现代种群中显性负荷多于隐性负荷,这可能导致适应性的长期丧失。整合系谱和基因组数据,我们强调了繁殖管理在减少近期近亲繁殖方面的作用。然而,持续的杂合性丧失、负荷积累以及历史近亲繁殖(即背景近亲繁殖)的持续影响,反对将该物种从国际自然保护联盟红色名录和《濒危物种法案》目前的濒危状态下调级别。野生和圈养种群中存在私人遗传变异,这表明野生 - 圈养杂交可以增强遗传多样性并减少显性负荷。我们的研究结果强调了基因组学在为保护管理和政策提供信息方面的作用。