• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越证据积累:共同目标信念引导社会群体中的行动泛化。

Beyond evidence accumulation: shared-goal belief guides action generalization in social groups.

作者信息

Duan Jipeng, Hu Yinfeng, Zhou Wenying, Ye Qingqing, Zhao Ting, Yin Jun

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, No. 616 Fenghua Rd., Ningbo, 315211, China.

Center of Group Behavior and Social Psychological Service, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 26;10(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00666-x.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-025-00666-x
PMID:40856779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12380659/
Abstract

People tend to generalize the actions of known group members to new ones when they are both members of the same group. This study was conducted to investigate how the prevalence of specific actions among multiple individuals determines action generalization within social groups. We propose that people rely on the belief that group members work toward a shared goal (i.e., shared-goal belief) to guide action generalization. Consequently, the extent of action generalization may not consistently increase with the sampled prevalence of group members performing the same goal-directed action, resulting in a deviation from graded action generalization (i.e., nongraded action generalization). Experiment 1 revealed that the more participants believed that group members pursued a shared goal, the greater the likelihood that nongraded action generalization would occur. In Experiment 2, experimental manipulation weakened the strength of the shared-goal belief and led to a graded pattern of action generalization with accumulated evidence of action prevalence. These findings suggest that a shared-goal belief within groups significantly shapes action generalization beyond the mere influence of sampled action prevalence. Social groups not only provide a framework for selecting evidence for action generalization but also shape prior beliefs that influence our expectations of others' actions.

摘要

当人们属于同一群体时,往往会将已知群体成员的行为推广到新成员身上。本研究旨在探讨多个个体中特定行为的普遍性如何决定社会群体中的行为推广。我们提出,人们依靠群体成员朝着共同目标努力的信念(即共同目标信念)来指导行为推广。因此,行为推广的程度可能不会随着执行相同目标导向行为的群体成员抽样普遍性而持续增加,从而导致偏离分级行为推广(即非分级行为推广)。实验1表明,参与者越相信群体成员追求共同目标,非分级行为推广发生的可能性就越大。在实验2中,实验操纵削弱了共同目标信念的强度,并导致了随着行为普遍性的累积证据而呈现出的分级行为推广模式。这些发现表明,群体中的共同目标信念显著地塑造了行为推广,而不仅仅是抽样行为普遍性的影响。社会群体不仅为选择行为推广的证据提供了框架,还塑造了影响我们对他人行为期望的先验信念。

相似文献

1
Beyond evidence accumulation: shared-goal belief guides action generalization in social groups.超越证据积累:共同目标信念引导社会群体中的行动泛化。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 26;10(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00666-x.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
The medial prefrontal cortex contributes to representing shared goals among group Members: Evidence from tDCS.内侧前额叶皮质有助于表征群体成员之间的共同目标:来自经颅直流电刺激的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2025 Nov 5;218:109246. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109246. Epub 2025 Aug 9.
4
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Self-Set Goals: Autistic Adults Facilitating Their Self-Determination Through Digitally Mediated Social Stories.自我设定目标:成年自闭症患者通过数字媒介社交故事促进自我决定
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):25-38. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0063. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Community Member Views on Autism Intervention: Effects of Closeness to Autistic People with Intellectual Disabilities And Nonspeaking Autistic People.社区成员对自闭症干预的看法:与智障自闭症患者及无语言能力自闭症患者亲近程度的影响。
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):253-271. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0202. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.

本文引用的文献

1
More evidence, greater generalization? The relation between the prevalence of observed action and the strength of generalization depends on action properties.更多证据,更广泛的概括?观察到的行为的普遍性与概括的强度之间的关系取决于行为属性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Mar;49(3):306-326. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001097.
2
Event-related potential and behavioural evidence of goal-based expectations for consistent actions among group members.与事件相关的潜在和行为证据表明,群体成员对一致行动的基于目标的期望。
Br J Psychol. 2023 Aug;114(3):662-677. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12643. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
3
Members of highly entitative groups are implicitly expected to behave consistently based on their deep-level goals instead of their shallow-level movements.
高度实体化群体的成员被隐含地期望根据其深层次的目标而不是其浅层的行为来表现一致。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jan;48(1):13-28. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001009. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
4
Action Generalization Across Group Members: Action Efficiency Matters.跨群体成员的动作泛化:动作效率很重要。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Apr;45(4):e12957. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12957.
5
Breaking the glass ceiling: For one and all?打破玻璃天花板:为了一个人和所有人?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Feb;120(2):257-277. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000260. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Neural mechanisms of predicting individual preferences based on group membership.基于群体归属预测个体偏好的神经机制。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Sep 7;16(9):1006-1017. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa136.
7
Structural thinking about social categories: Evidence from formal explanations, generics, and generalization.社会范畴的结构思维:来自形式解释、类属和泛化的证据。
Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104383. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104383. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
8
Gender Intensification and Gender Generalization Biases in Pre-adolescents, Adolescents, and Emerging Adults.青少年和成年早期的性别强化和性别泛化偏见。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2020 Sep;38(3):415-433. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12326. Epub 2020 Mar 1.
9
Collective recognition and function in concepts of institutional social groups.制度社会群体概念中的集体认同和功能。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Jul;149(7):1344-1359. doi: 10.1037/xge0000711. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
10
Generalizing About Striking Properties: Do Glippets Love to Play With Fire?关于显著特性的归纳:Glippets喜欢玩火吗?
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 29;10:1971. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01971. eCollection 2019.