El Arab Rabie Adel, Al Moosa Omayma Abdulaziz
Almoosa College of Health Sciences, Alhsa, Saudi Arabia.
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Aug 26;8(1):548. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01722-y.
This systematic review examines the cost-effectiveness, utility, and budget impact of clinical artificial intelligence (AI) interventions across diverse healthcare settings. Nineteen studies spanning oncology, cardiology, ophthalmology, and infectious diseases demonstrate that AI improves diagnostic accuracy, enhances quality-adjusted life years, and reduces costs-largely by minimizing unnecessary procedures and optimizing resource use. Several interventions achieved incremental cost-effectiveness ratios well below accepted thresholds. However, many evaluations relied on static models that may overestimate benefits by not capturing the adaptive learning of AI systems over time. Additionally, indirect costs, infrastructure investments, and equity considerations were often underreported, suggesting that reported economic benefits may be overstated. Dynamic modeling indicates sustained long-term value, but further research is needed to incorporate comprehensive cost components and subgroup analyses. These findings underscore the clinical promise and economic complexity of AI in healthcare, emphasizing the need for context-specific, methodologically robust evaluations to guide future policy and practice effectively.
本系统评价考察了临床人工智能(AI)干预措施在不同医疗环境中的成本效益、效用和预算影响。涵盖肿瘤学、心脏病学、眼科和传染病领域的19项研究表明,人工智能提高了诊断准确性,延长了质量调整生命年,并降低了成本——主要是通过减少不必要的程序和优化资源利用。一些干预措施实现的增量成本效益比远低于公认阈值。然而,许多评估依赖于静态模型,这些模型可能因未捕捉到人工智能系统随时间的适应性学习而高估了效益。此外,间接成本、基础设施投资和公平性考虑因素往往报告不足,这表明所报告的经济效益可能被夸大。动态建模表明具有持续的长期价值,但需要进一步研究以纳入全面的成本组成部分和亚组分析。这些发现强调了人工智能在医疗保健中的临床前景和经济复杂性,强调需要进行针对具体情况、方法稳健的评估,以有效指导未来的政策和实践。