Lou Jiaqi, Xiang Ziyi, Zhu Xiaoyu, Song Jingyao, Huang Neng, Li Jiliang, Jin Guoying, Fan Youfen, Cui Shengyong
Burn Department, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Health Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 8;12:1485474. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1485474. eCollection 2025.
This latest systematic review and meta-analysis aim to examine efficacy and safety of androgen analog oxandrolone in burn patients.
Relevant articles were retrieved from Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of science, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, Wanfang database and China Biology Medicine disc. The output measures were the weight loss in catabolic phase, weight gain in recovery phase, lean body mass in recovery phas, operation times, healing time of donor area, length of hospital stay/total body surface area burned (LOS/TBSA%), length of hospital stay (LOS), side effects, infection and mortality. Data were pooled and expressed as relative risk (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
19 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, with 779 patients who received oxandrolone (treatment group) and 1,227 patients who received standard care or placebo (control group). The pooled data from all included studies demonstrated that the treatment group has significantly reduced weight loss in catabolic phase (SMD = 1.86; 95% CI: -0.13-3.84; < 0.001, I = 95.0%), operation times (SMD = -0.69; 95% CI: -1.84-0.46, < 0.001, I = 96.8%), LOS/TBSA% (SMD = -1.07; 95% CI: -2.43-0.29, < 0.001, I = 98.1%), LOS (SMD = -0.55; 95% CI: -1.32-0.22, < 0.001, I = 97.3%) and increased weight gain (SMD = 0.58; 95% CI: -1.21-2.38, < 0.001, I = 95.1%), as well as lean body mass in recovery phase (SMD = 1.30; 95% CI: -0.47-3.24, < 0.001, I = 95.0%). There were no significant differences in healing time of donor area (SMD = -1.48; 95% CI: -2.18-0.77, = 0.116, I = 53.7%), side effects (RR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.68-1.87, = 0.174, I = 28.4%) and infection (RR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.67-1.02, = 0.639, I = 0.0%) between the two groups, and it did not significantly reduce mortality (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.47-2.32, = 0.013).
Our meta-analysis showed that oxandrolone supplements are beneficial for burn patients as they significantly reduce the weight loss in catabolic phase, operation times, LOS/TBSA%, LOS, mortality and increase weight gain and lean body mass in recovery phase. However, this intervention has minimal impact on healing time of donor area, side effects and infection.
这项最新的系统评价和荟萃分析旨在研究雄激素类似物氧雄龙对烧伤患者的疗效和安全性。
从PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、科学网、国际临床试验注册平台、中国知网、维普中文科技期刊数据库、万方数据库和中国生物医学光盘数据库中检索相关文章。产出指标为分解代谢期体重减轻、恢复期体重增加、恢复期瘦体重、手术时间、供区愈合时间、住院时间/烧伤总面积(LOS/TBSA%)、住院时间(LOS)、副作用、感染和死亡率。数据进行合并,并以相对风险(RR)和标准化均数差(SMD)及95%置信区间(CI)表示。
本系统评价和荟萃分析纳入了19项研究,其中779例患者接受氧雄龙治疗(治疗组),1227例患者接受标准治疗或安慰剂治疗(对照组)。所有纳入研究的合并数据表明,治疗组在分解代谢期体重减轻(SMD = 1.86;95% CI:-0.13 - 3.84;P < 0.001,I = 95.0%)、手术时间(SMD = -0.69;95% CI:-1.84 - 0.46,P < 0.001,I = 96.8%)、LOS/TBSA%(SMD = -1.07;95% CI:-2.43 - 0.29,P < 0.001,I = 98.1%)、LOS(SMD = -0.55;95% CI:-1.32 - 0.22,P < 0.001,I = 97.3%)方面显著降低,体重增加(SMD = 0.58;95% CI:-1.21 - 2.38,P < 0.001,I = 95.1%)以及恢复期瘦体重(SMD = 1.30;95% CI:-0.47 - 3.24,P < 0.001,I = 95.0%)增加。两组在供区愈合时间(SMD = -1.48;95% CI:-2.18 - 0.77,P = 0.116,I = 53.7%)、副作用(RR = 1.13;95% CI:0.68 - 1.87,P = 0.174,I = 28.4%)和感染(RR = 0.83;95% CI:0.67 - 1.02,P = 0.639,I = 0.0%)方面无显著差异,且未显著降低死亡率(RR = 1.04,95% CI:0.47 - 2.32,P = 0.013)。
我们的荟萃分析表明,氧雄龙补充剂对烧伤患者有益,因为它能显著降低分解代谢期体重减轻、手术时间、LOS/TBSA%、LOS、死亡率,并增加恢复期体重增加和瘦体重。然而,这种干预对供区愈合时间、副作用和感染的影响最小。