Kulish N M
Int J Psychoanal Psychother. 1985;11:79-116. doi: 10.1080/02668738500700181.
The term projective identification has been broadened from its original meaning as set forth by Melanie Klein to include the interpersonal sphere. A review of the psychoanalytic literature on projective identification shows varying uses, definitional problems, and conceptual confusion and raises serious questions regarding the possibility of integrating intrapersonal and interpersonal models of the mind. Clinical material is presented to show that phenomena commonly described as projective identification are variable, complex patterns of behavior that are not well understood. The author concludes that the major definitional and conceptual difficulties with the term justify that its usage be limited. At the same time, the powerful clinical phenomena--the transference-countertransference interactions--described as projective identification cannot be ignored.
投射性认同这一术语已从梅兰妮·克莱因最初提出的含义扩展到包括人际领域。对关于投射性认同的精神分析文献的回顾显示，其用法各异、存在定义问题以及概念混淆，这就引发了关于整合心理的人际和内在模型可能性的严重质疑。文中呈现的临床资料表明，通常被描述为投射性认同的现象是多变且复杂的行为模式，人们对此并未充分理解。作者得出结论，该术语在定义和概念上的主要困难证明其使用应受到限制。与此同时，被描述为投射性认同的强大临床现象——移情 - 反移情互动——不能被忽视。
