• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增加与减少:由感知切换意识调节的双眼竞争期间对比度变化的不对称效应。

Increases versus decreases: Asymmetric effects of contrast changes during binocular rivalry modulated by awareness of perceptual switch.

作者信息

Huang Changzhi, Jiang Rong, Meng Ming

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences, Ministry of Education, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.

Center for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Vis. 2025 Aug 1;25(10):14. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.10.14.

DOI:10.1167/jov.25.10.14
PMID:40862652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12395786/
Abstract

The human visual system prioritizes dynamic stimuli, which attract attention and more readily break suppression to reach perceptual awareness. Here, we investigated whether dynamic changes in contrast-either increasing or decreasing-are equally effective in facilitating the breakthrough of suppressed stimuli during binocular rivalry. In Experiment 1a, we found that contrast increases led to significantly faster breakthroughs into perceptual dominance compared with decreases. Notably, increases accelerated breakthrough relative to the unchanged baseline, whereas decreases delayed it. Experiments 1b and 1c replicated the results of Experiment 1a using, respectively, a briefer contrast change (10 ms instead of 100 ms) and partial breakthrough reports, confirming a robust asymmetry in the processing of suppressed stimuli between increases and decreases. In Experiment 2a, random dots moving in different random directions were presented dichoptically, making interocular conflict imperceptible and unreportable. We found that any change in intensity in such rivalry settings-regardless of increase or decrease-promoted perceptual dominance. By introducing motion stimuli into the Experiment 1 paradigm, Experiment 2b demonstrated that the divergence between Experiments 1 and 2 was not due to low-level stimulus differences. Taken together, our results reveal an asymmetric effect of contrast changes during binocular rivalry. This finding highlights the interplay between subliminal sensory processing of contrast changes and conscious awareness, shedding light on developing theoretical models of binocular rivalry.

摘要

人类视觉系统优先处理动态刺激,这类刺激会吸引注意力,并更容易打破抑制以达到感知觉意识。在此,我们研究了对比度的动态变化(增加或减少)在双眼竞争过程中促进被抑制刺激突破方面是否同样有效。在实验1a中,我们发现与对比度降低相比,对比度增加导致进入感知优势的突破明显更快。值得注意的是,相对于不变的基线,增加加速了突破,而降低则延迟了突破。实验1b和1c分别使用更短暂的对比度变化(10毫秒而非100毫秒)和部分突破报告重复了实验1a的结果,证实了在处理被抑制刺激时增加和减少之间存在强烈的不对称性。在实验2a中,以双眼分视的方式呈现朝不同随机方向移动的随机点,使双眼冲突不可察觉且无法报告。我们发现,在这种竞争情境下,强度的任何变化(无论增加还是减少)都会促进感知优势。通过将运动刺激引入实验1范式,实验2b表明实验1和实验2之间的差异并非由于低水平的刺激差异。综合来看,我们的结果揭示了双眼竞争期间对比度变化的不对称效应。这一发现凸显了对比度变化的阈下感觉处理与意识觉知之间的相互作用,为发展双眼竞争的理论模型提供了线索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2921/12395786/c58ebcc8baa2/jovi-25-10-14-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2921/12395786/c1804b6ed857/jovi-25-10-14-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2921/12395786/be5c9d0c5b42/jovi-25-10-14-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2921/12395786/6cad0e02b16d/jovi-25-10-14-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2921/12395786/830d58814dec/jovi-25-10-14-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2921/12395786/aaab6df85bf9/jovi-25-10-14-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2921/12395786/c58ebcc8baa2/jovi-25-10-14-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2921/12395786/c1804b6ed857/jovi-25-10-14-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2921/12395786/be5c9d0c5b42/jovi-25-10-14-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2921/12395786/6cad0e02b16d/jovi-25-10-14-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2921/12395786/830d58814dec/jovi-25-10-14-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2921/12395786/aaab6df85bf9/jovi-25-10-14-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2921/12395786/c58ebcc8baa2/jovi-25-10-14-f006.jpg

相似文献

1
Increases versus decreases: Asymmetric effects of contrast changes during binocular rivalry modulated by awareness of perceptual switch.增加与减少:由感知切换意识调节的双眼竞争期间对比度变化的不对称效应。
J Vis. 2025 Aug 1;25(10):14. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.10.14.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Eye dominance alternations in binocular rivalry do not require visual awareness.双眼竞争中的眼优势交替并不需要视觉意识。
J Vis. 2014 Sep 2;14(11):2. doi: 10.1167/14.11.2.
4
The effect of stimulus size on binocular luster and its implications for the interocular conflict model.刺激大小对双眼光泽的影响及其对双眼冲突模型的启示。
Vision Res. 2025 May;230:108590. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2025.108590. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
5
The role of voluntary and involuntary attention in selecting perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry.双眼竞争期间,自愿注意和非自愿注意在选择知觉优势方面的作用。
Perception. 2007;36(2):288-98. doi: 10.1068/p5494.
6
Magnocellular-biased interocular integration during onset rivalry in normal vision and binocular imbalance.正常视觉和双眼不平衡状态下,起始竞争过程中的大细胞偏向性双眼整合。
J Vis. 2025 Aug 1;25(10):8. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.10.8.
7
Audiovisual interactions in binocular rivalry.双眼竞争中的视听交互
J Vis. 2010 Aug 26;10(10):27. doi: 10.1167/10.10.27.
8
More superimposition for contrast-modulated than luminance-modulated stimuli during binocular rivalry.在双眼竞争期间,与亮度调制刺激相比,对比调制刺激的叠加更多。
Vision Res. 2018 Jan;142:40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
9
Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry.生物运动的知觉分组促进双眼竞争。
Curr Biol. 2004 Sep 21;14(18):1670-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.08.064.
10
Center-surround motion interaction between low and high spatial frequencies under binocular and dichoptic viewing.双眼和双视野观看条件下低空间频率与高空间频率之间的中心-外周运动相互作用
J Vis. 2025 Jul 1;25(8):15. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.8.15.

本文引用的文献

1
Afterimage duration depends on how deeply invisible stimuli were suppressed.后像持续时间取决于不可见刺激被抑制的深度。
J Vis. 2023 Aug 1;23(8):1. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.8.1.
2
Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Auditory Looming Bias.听觉逼近偏向背后的神经机制。
Audit Percept Cogn. 2021 Apr 3;4(1-2):60-73. doi: 10.1080/25742442.2021.1977582. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
3
Binocular rivalry reveals an out-of-equilibrium neural dynamics suited for decision-making.双眼竞争揭示了一种适合决策的非平衡神经动力学。
Elife. 2021 Aug 9;10:e61581. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61581.
4
Attention model of binocular rivalry.双眼竞争的注意模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):E6192-E6201. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620475114. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
5
Visual input that matches the content of visual working memory requires less (not faster) evidence sampling to reach conscious access.与视觉工作记忆内容相匹配的视觉输入,需要较少(而非更快)的证据采样才能进入意识通达。
J Vis. 2016 Sep 1;16(11):26. doi: 10.1167/16.11.26.
6
Negligible fronto-parietal BOLD activity accompanying unreportable switches in bistable perception.在双眼竞争感知中,不可报告的切换伴随着可忽略不计的额顶叶血氧水平依赖性功能磁共振成像活动。
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Nov;18(11):1672-8. doi: 10.1038/nn.4130. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
7
Short- and long-lasting consequences of novelty, deviance and surprise on brain and cognition.新奇、异常和意外刺激对大脑和认知的短期和长期后果。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Aug;55:268-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 12.
8
Information matching the content of visual working memory is prioritized for conscious access.与视觉工作记忆内容相匹配的信息被优先用于意识访问。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Dec;24(12):2472-80. doi: 10.1177/0956797613495882. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Stimulus predictability reduces responses in primary visual cortex.刺激的可预测性降低了初级视觉皮层的反应。
J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 24;30(8):2960-6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3730-10.2010.
10
Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition.视觉认知中的期望(与注意力)。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Sep;13(9):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.003. Epub 2009 Aug 27.