Pérez-Soto Erika, Bourgi Rim, Hardan Louis, Cuevas-Suarez Carlos Enrique, Monjáras-Ávila Ana Josefina, Fernández-Barrera Miguel Ángel, Nassar Nicolas, Lukomska-Szymanska Monika, Daoui Rima, Kharouf Naji, Haikel Youssef
Dental Materials Laboratory, Academic Area of Dentistry, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo State, San Agustín Tlaxiaca 42160, Mexico.
Department of Restorative and Esthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2180, Lebanon.
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Aug 5;13(8):354. doi: 10.3390/dj13080354.
Immediate dentin sealing (IDS) has been widely investigated in sound dentin; however, its efficacy on demineralized dentin remains insufficiently explored. This in vitro experimental study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of indirect composite resin restorations bonded to demineralized dentin using IDS, assessed at 24 h and after 6 months of aging. Twenty-five extracted premolars were randomly divided into five groups: (1) control (no sealing), (2) IDS applied to sound dentin (sound-IDS), (3) IDS applied to demineralized dentin (carious-IDS), (4) delayed dentin sealing (DDS) on sound dentin (sound-DDS), and (5) DDS on demineralized dentin (carious-DDS). SBS values were analyzed using a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with dentin condition (sound vs. demineralized), aging time (24 h vs. 6 months), and sealing strategy (control, IDS, DDS) as independent variables. Statistical analyses were performed using SigmaPlot 12.0, with significance set at < 0.05. The results showed that IDS led to significantly higher SBS than DDS ( < 0.05). Bond strength was significantly influenced by dentin condition ( < 0.05), and all interactions between variables-particularly between dentin condition and sealing strategy, and between aging time and treatment-were statistically significant ( < 0.001). Overall, bond strength was higher at 24 h than after 6 months. IDS showed optimal performance in sound dentin, while DDS resulted in better long-term outcomes in demineralized dentin. These findings suggest that DDS may be the more effective approach in cases of carious or demineralized dentin.
即刻牙本质封闭(IDS)已在健康牙本质中得到广泛研究;然而,其在脱矿牙本质上的效果仍未得到充分探索。本体外实验研究旨在评估使用IDS粘结到脱矿牙本质上的间接复合树脂修复体的剪切粘结强度(SBS),分别在24小时和老化6个月后进行评估。将25颗拔除的前磨牙随机分为五组:(1)对照组(不封闭),(2)应用于健康牙本质的IDS(健康-IDS),(3)应用于脱矿牙本质的IDS(龋坏-IDS),(4)对健康牙本质进行延迟牙本质封闭(DDS)(健康-DDS),以及(5)对脱矿牙本质进行DDS(龋坏-DDS)。使用三因素方差分析(ANOVA)分析SBS值,将牙本质状况(健康与脱矿)、老化时间(24小时与6个月)和封闭策略(对照组、IDS、DDS)作为自变量。使用SigmaPlot 12.0进行统计分析,显著性设定为<0.05。结果表明,IDS导致的SBS显著高于DDS(<0.05)。粘结强度受牙本质状况显著影响(<0.05),并且变量之间的所有相互作用——特别是牙本质状况与封闭策略之间以及老化时间与处理之间的相互作用——具有统计学显著性(<0.001)。总体而言,24小时时的粘结强度高于6个月后。IDS在健康牙本质中表现出最佳性能,而DDS在脱矿牙本质中产生了更好的长期效果。这些发现表明,在龋坏或脱矿牙本质的情况下,DDS可能是更有效的方法。