Aparicio Jesus A, Mendez S Pedro M, Malvicini Giulia, Grandini Simone, Gaeta Carlo, García Guerrero Ana Paula, Miranda Robles Kristel Lidice, Aranguren José, Pérez Alejandro R
Graduate Endodontics Program, School of Dentistry, Universidad Catolica de Santiago de Guayaquil (UCSG), Guayaquil 090615, Ecuador.
Surpreendente Research Group, 4400-239 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Aug 15;13(8):368. doi: 10.3390/dj13080368.
This study aimed to compare the clinical durability, mechanical performance, and stress behavior of three NiTi rotary systems-BlueShaper (Blue), BlueShaper Pro (Dual Wire), and BlueShaper Gold (fully gold-treated NiTi)-through a multimodal evaluation that included simulated instrumentation in 3D-printed replicas, mechanical testing, and finite element analysis (FEA). Sixty instruments (n = 20 per group) were tested. Simulated canal preparation was conducted in standardized 3D-printed mandibular molars with a 40° mesial root curvature until fracture occurred. Mechanical tests included torsional and flexural loading using a universal testing machine and stainless steel blocks with a standardized 40° curvature. FEA simulations evaluated von Mises stress, shear stress, total deformation, cyclic fatigue behavior, and contact pressure between the instrument and canal wall. BlueShaper Gold prepared an average of 7.5 canals before fracture, followed by BlueShaper Pro (5.67 canals) and Blue (5.00 canals) ( < 0.001). Gold exhibited the highest torsional resistance (6.08 ± 3.08 N) and the longest fatigue life (325 ± 55.7 cycles), with the lowest von Mises stress and damage factor in FEA. BlueShaper Pro showed the longest time to fracture in mechanical testing (73.85 ± 7.10 s) and balanced mechanical behavior. Blue demonstrated the lowest performance across most parameters, including the shortest fatigue life and highest stress concentration. BlueShaper Gold exhibited the highest mechanical strength and fatigue resistance. BlueShaper Pro demonstrated the longest fatigue life and balanced mechanical behavior. Blue showed the lowest performance across most parameters. The strong correlation among clinical, mechanical, and FEA data reinforces the critical role of alloy composition in determining instrument durability, even when design remains constant.
本研究旨在通过多模态评估比较三种镍钛旋转系统——BlueShaper(Blue)、BlueShaper Pro(双丝)和BlueShaper Gold(全金处理镍钛)的临床耐久性、机械性能和应力行为,该评估包括在3D打印模型中进行模拟器械操作、机械测试和有限元分析(FEA)。测试了60根器械(每组n = 20)。在具有40°近中根曲率的标准化3D打印下颌磨牙中进行模拟根管预备,直至器械折断。机械测试包括使用万能试验机和具有标准化40°曲率的不锈钢块进行扭转和弯曲加载。FEA模拟评估了米塞斯应力、剪应力、总变形、循环疲劳行为以及器械与根管壁之间的接触压力。BlueShaper Gold在折断前平均预备了7.5个根管,其次是BlueShaper Pro(5.67个根管)和Blue(5.00个根管)(<0.001)。Gold表现出最高的抗扭强度(6.08±3.08 N)和最长的疲劳寿命(325±55.7次循环),在FEA中米塞斯应力和损伤因子最低。BlueShaper Pro在机械测试中表现出最长的折断时间(73.85±7.10秒)和平衡的机械性能。Blue在大多数参数上表现最差,包括最短的疲劳寿命和最高的应力集中。BlueShaper Gold表现出最高的机械强度和抗疲劳性。BlueShaper Pro表现出最长的疲劳寿命和平衡的机械性能。Blue在大多数参数上表现最差。临床、机械和FEA数据之间的强相关性强化了合金成分在决定器械耐久性方面的关键作用,即使设计保持不变。