Minimally invasive surgical techniques in the era of hybrid coronary revascularization: additional benefits for the elderly patients?
作者信息
Nenna Antonio, Lusini Mario, Greco Salvatore Matteo, Covino Elvio, Chello Massimo
机构信息
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
出版信息
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Oct;13(10):875-879. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.10.009.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Minimally invasive surgical techniques in the era of hybrid coronary revascularization: additional benefits for the elderly patients?杂交冠状动脉血运重建时代的微创外科技术：对老年患者有额外益处吗？
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Oct;13(10):875-879. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.10.009.
2
Long-Term Outcome of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Single-Center Experience.接受微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的长期预后：单中心经验
Innovations (Phila). 2018 Jan/Feb;13(1):23-28. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000466.
3
Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Surgery and Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Can We Routinely Achieve Less Invasive Coronary Surgery?微创多支冠状动脉手术与杂交冠状动脉血运重建：我们能否常规实现创伤更小的冠状动脉手术？
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2016 Jan-Mar;12(1):14-9. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-12-1-14.
4
Reviewing hybrid coronary revascularization: challenges, controversies and opportunities.回顾杂交冠状动脉血运重建：挑战、争议与机遇。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2016 Jul;14(7):821-30. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2016.1174576. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
5
"Hybrid" and combined percutaneous and surgical intervention to treat selected cardiac patients: a new strategy.“杂交”及经皮与外科联合干预治疗特定心脏病患者：一种新策略。
G Ital Cardiol. 1999 Jan;29(1):27-33.
6
Hybrid coronary revascularization in the era of drug-eluting stents.药物洗脱支架时代的杂交冠状动脉血运重建术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Nov;78(5):1861-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.07.024.
7
Minimally invasive hybrid coronary artery revascularization.微创杂交冠状动脉血运重建术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;86(6):1856-60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.034.
8
[Comparison of outcomes of two minimally invasive approaches for multi-vessel coronary revascularization].[两种多支血管冠状动脉血运重建微创方法的疗效比较]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Dec 18;49(6):1066-1070.
9
Hybrid revascularization feasibility in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting combined with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease.急性冠状动脉综合征合并多支血管病变患者行微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术联合经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术时的杂交血运重建可行性
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Dec;49(12):700-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02913508.
10
A comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization and off-pump coronary revascularization.杂交冠状动脉血运重建与非体外循环冠状动脉血运重建的比较。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013 Apr;11(4):395-7. doi: 10.1586/erc.13.19.
引用本文的文献
1
Minimally Invasive Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass as Palliative Revascularization in High-Risk Patients.微创非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术作为高危患者的姑息性血运重建术
Clin Pract. 2025 Aug 6;15(8):147. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15080147.
本文引用的文献
1
Complete Coronary Revascularization Improves Survival in Octogenarians.完全血运重建可提高八旬老人的生存率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Aug;102(2):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.065. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
2
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: An Attractive Alternative Between Actual Results and Future Trends.杂交冠状动脉血运重建术：实际效果与未来趋势之间的一种有吸引力的选择。
Surg Technol Int. 2016 Apr;28:204-10.
3
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus optimal medical therapy alone: effectiveness of incomplete revascularization in high risk patients.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与单纯最佳药物治疗的比较：高危患者不完全血运重建的效果。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Jan;13(1):23-30. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.01.008.
4
Validity of SYNTAX score II for risk stratification of percutaneous coronary interventions: A patient-level pooled analysis of 5,433 patients enrolled in contemporary coronary stent trials.SYNTAX评分II在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗风险分层中的有效性：对当代冠状动脉支架试验中纳入的5433例患者的个体水平汇总分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:111-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.248. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
5
Complete versus incomplete coronary revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.多支冠状动脉疾病患者的完全性与不完全性冠状动脉血运重建
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2015 Mar;17(3):366. doi: 10.1007/s11936-015-0366-1.
6
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.血流储备分数与血管造影术在指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较：一项荟萃分析。
Heart. 2015 Mar;101(6):455-62. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306578. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
7
Long-term forecasting and comparison of mortality in the Evaluation of the Xience Everolimus Eluting Stent vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial: prospective validation of the SYNTAX Score II.EXCEL 试验中依维莫司洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干血运重建效果的长期预测和死亡率比较：SYNTAX 评分 II 的前瞻性验证。
Eur Heart J. 2015 May 21;36(20):1231-41. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu518. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
8
Hybrid revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease.多支冠状动脉疾病的杂交血运重建。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov;7(11):1277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.025. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
9
Advanced hybrid closed chest revascularization: an innovative strategy for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease†.先进的混合式闭式胸廓血管重建术：一种治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的创新策略†
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Dec;46(6):e94-102; discussion e102. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu357. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
10
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).2014年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南：欧洲心脏病学会（ESC）和欧洲心胸外科学会（EACTS）心肌血运重建特别工作组编写，欧洲经皮心血管介入协会（EAPCI）提供特别贡献。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
Zotero 插件