• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于间隔6周进行的多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)扫描的前列腺癌PI-RADS分类差异。

Differences in PI-RADS Classification of Prostate Cancer Based on mpMRI Scans Taken 6 Weeks Apart.

作者信息

Schoch Justine, Düring Viola, Wiedmann Michael, Overhoff Daniel, Dillinger Daniel, Waldeck Stephan, Schmelz Hans-Ulrich, Nestler Tim

机构信息

Department of Urology, Federal Armed Forces Hospital Koblenz, Ruebenacher Strasse 170, 56072 Koblenz, Germany.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Federal Armed Forces Hospital Koblenz, Ruebenacher Strasse 170, 56072 Koblenz, Germany.

出版信息

Tomography. 2025 Aug 18;11(8):92. doi: 10.3390/tomography11080092.

DOI:10.3390/tomography11080092
PMID:40863883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12390117/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the consistency of lesion identification by Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and the related clinical and histological characteristics in a high-volume tertiary care center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The analysis used real-world data from 111 patients between 2018 and 2022. Each patient underwent two multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the prostate at different institutions with a median interval of 42 days between the scans, followed by an MRI-fused biopsy conducted 7 days after the second MRI.

RESULTS

The PI-RADS classifications assigned to the index lesions in the in-house prostate MRI were as follows: PI-RADS V, 33.3% (n = 37); PI-RADS IV, 49.5% (n = 55); PI-RADS III, 12.6% (n = 14); and PI-RADS II, 4.5% (n = 5). Cancer detection rates for randomized and/or targeted biopsies were 91.9% (n = 34) for PI-RADS V, 65.5% (n = 36) for PI-RADS IV, 21.4% (n = 3) for PI-RADS III, and 20% (n = 1) for PI-RADS II. Overall, malignant histology was observed in 64.9% (n = 72) of the targeted lesions and 57.7% (n = 64) of the randomized biopsies. In the first performed, external MRI, 18% (n = 20) and 10.8% (n = 12) of the patients were classified in the higher and lower PI-RADS categories, respectively. The biopsy plan was adjusted for 57 patients (51.4%); nevertheless, any cancer could have possibly been identified regardless of the adjustments.

CONCLUSION

The 6-week interval between the MRI scans did not affect the quality of the biopsy results significantly.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查在一家大型三级医疗中心中,前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)对病变识别的一致性以及相关的临床和组织学特征。

材料与方法

该分析使用了2018年至2022年间111例患者的真实世界数据。每位患者在不同机构接受了两次前列腺多参数磁共振成像(MRI)扫描,两次扫描的中位间隔时间为42天,随后在第二次MRI扫描7天后进行MRI融合活检。

结果

内部前列腺MRI中对索引病变的PI-RADS分类如下:PI-RADS V,33.3%(n = 37);PI-RADS IV,49.5%(n = 55);PI-RADS III,12.6%(n = 14);PI-RADS II,4.5%(n = 5)。PI-RADS V的随机和/或靶向活检癌症检出率为91.9%(n = 34),PI-RADS IV为65.5%(n = 36),PI-RADS III为21.4%(n = 3),PI-RADS II为20%(n = 1)。总体而言,在64.9%(n = 72)的靶向病变和57.7%(n = 64)的随机活检中观察到恶性组织学。在首次进行的外部MRI中,分别有18%(n = 20)和10.8%(n = 12)的患者被归类为较高和较低的PI-RADS类别。对57例患者(51.4%)的活检计划进行了调整;然而,无论调整如何,任何癌症都有可能被识别出来。

结论

MRI扫描之间6周的间隔时间对活检结果的质量没有显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f50/12390117/a535d27694b1/tomography-11-00092-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f50/12390117/079d82796ea2/tomography-11-00092-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f50/12390117/17d1b61e436c/tomography-11-00092-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f50/12390117/a535d27694b1/tomography-11-00092-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f50/12390117/079d82796ea2/tomography-11-00092-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f50/12390117/17d1b61e436c/tomography-11-00092-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f50/12390117/a535d27694b1/tomography-11-00092-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in PI-RADS Classification of Prostate Cancer Based on mpMRI Scans Taken 6 Weeks Apart.基于间隔6周进行的多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)扫描的前列腺癌PI-RADS分类差异。
Tomography. 2025 Aug 18;11(8):92. doi: 10.3390/tomography11080092.
2
Prospective Validation of an Automated Hybrid Multidimensional MRI Tool for Prostate Cancer Detection Using Targeted Biopsy: Comparison with PI-RADS-based Assessment.使用靶向活检对用于前列腺癌检测的自动化混合多维MRI工具进行前瞻性验证:与基于PI-RADS的评估方法的比较
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 Jan;7(1):e240156. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240156.
3
Follow-up on patients with initial negative mpMRI target and systematic biopsy for PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions - an EAU-YAU study enhancing prostate cancer detection.对初始mpMRI检查结果为阴性且针对PI-RADS≥3病变进行系统活检的患者进行随访——一项欧洲泌尿外科学会-亚洲泌尿外科学会联合研究,旨在提高前列腺癌的检测率。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Jun;28(2):435-443. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00904-1. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
4
The presence of prostate MRI-visible lesions at follow-up biopsy as a risk factor for histopathological upgrading during active surveillance.随访活检时前列腺MRI可见病变作为主动监测期间组织病理学升级的危险因素。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04871-6.
5
Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy after Multiparametric Prostate MRI with VERDICT Analysis: The INNOVATE Study.避免多参数前列腺 MRI 后不必要的活检:VERDICT 分析研究。
Radiology. 2022 Dec;305(3):623-630. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212536. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
6
An integrated nomogram combining deep learning, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring, and clinical variables for identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI: a retrospective multicentre study.基于深度学习、前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分以及临床变量的列线图模型鉴别双侧磁共振成像前列腺癌的临床意义:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Jul;3(7):e445-e454. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00082-0.
7
Patients with multiple mpMRI region of interests: should we omit targeted biopsies of secondary lesions?具有多个磁共振多参数成像(mpMRI)感兴趣区域的患者:我们是否应省略对继发性病变的靶向活检?
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Feb 24. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04854-7.
8
Evaluating Biparametric Versus Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: An International, Paired, Noninferiority, Confirmatory Observer Study.评估双参数与多参数磁共振成像在诊断具有临床意义的前列腺癌中的应用:一项国际、配对、非劣效性、验证性观察者研究。
Eur Urol. 2025 Feb;87(2):240-250. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.035. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
9
Visibility of mpMRI region of interest on ultrasound during cognitive fusion targeted biopsy predicts prostate cancer detection: a prospective single-center study.认知融合靶向活检期间超声下磁共振多参数成像感兴趣区域的可视性预测前列腺癌的检出:一项前瞻性单中心研究
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Dec 23. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04750-6.
10
Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版能否减少 PSA 水平在 4-10ng/ml 的男性进行不必要的前列腺活检?
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 May;144(5):987-995. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2616-6. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
MRI-guided in-bore biopsy of the prostate - defining the optimal number of cores needed.MRI 引导下经直肠前列腺穿刺活检术——确定所需的最佳芯数。
Cancer Imaging. 2024 Jul 1;24(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00734-3.
2
Same-day repeatability and Between-Sequence reproducibility of Mean ADC in PI-RADS lesions.PI-RADS 病灶平均 ADC 值的日内重复性和序列间可重复性。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110898. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110898. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
3
Inter-reader agreement of the prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL) score for basic readers in prostate MRI: A multi-center study.
前列腺磁共振成像基本读片者前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-QUAL)评分的观察者间一致性:一项多中心研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110923. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110923. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
4
Factors Influencing Variability in the Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.影响多参数磁共振成像检测临床显著前列腺癌性能变异性的因素:系统文献回顾。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Apr;3(2):145-167. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
5
Quality of Prostate MRI: Is the PI-RADS Standard Sufficient?前列腺 MRI 质量:PI-RADS 标准是否足够?
Acad Radiol. 2021 Feb;28(2):199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.01.031. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
6
A multicentre assessment of prostate MRI quality and compliance with UK and international standards.多中心评估前列腺 MRI 质量及对英国和国际标准的遵循情况。
Clin Radiol. 2019 Nov;74(11):894.e19-894.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.03.026. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
7
Updated recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology on prostate cancer management in older patients.国际老年肿瘤学会关于老年前列腺癌患者管理的最新建议。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jul;116:116-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.031. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
8
Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌流行病学
World J Oncol. 2019 Apr;10(2):63-89. doi: 10.14740/wjon1191. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
9
Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.经直肠超声引导前列腺活检与多参数前列腺磁共振成像引导活检在前列腺特异性抗原升高的初次活检男性中的头对头比较:一项大型前瞻性多中心临床研究。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
10
MRI-guided in-bore biopsy for prostate cancer: what does the evidence say? A case series of 554 patients and a review of the current literature.MRI 引导下经直肠前列腺穿刺活检术:证据说了什么?554 例患者的病例系列及对当前文献的复习。
World J Urol. 2019 Jul;37(7):1263-1279. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2497-y. Epub 2018 Sep 25.