Chatterjee Aritrick, Yousuf Ambereen N, Engelmann Roger, Harmath Carla, Lee Grace, Medved Milica, Jamison Ernest B, Lorente Campos Abel, Gundogdu Batuhan, Gerber Glenn, Reynolds Luke F, Modi Parth K, Antic Tatjana, Giurcanu Mihai, Eggener Scott, Karczmar Gregory S, Oto Aytekin
From the Department of Radiology (A.C., A.N.Y., R.E., C.H., G.L., M.M., E.B.J., A.L.C., B.G., G.S.K., A.O.), Sanford J. Grossman Center of Excellence in Prostate Imaging and Image Guided Therapy (A.C., A.N.Y., M.M., A.L.C., B.G.), Department of Surgery, Section of Urology (G.G., L.F.R., P.K.M., S.E.), Department of Pathology (T.A.), and Department of Public Health Sciences (M.G.), University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637.
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 Jan;7(1):e240156. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240156.
Purpose To evaluate the use of an automated hybrid multidimensional MRI (HM-MRI)-based tool to prospectively identify prostate cancer targets before MRI/US fusion biopsy in comparison with Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS)-based multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) evaluation by expert radiologists. Materials and Methods In this prospective clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT03585660), 91 male participants (mean age, 65 years ± 8 [SD]) with known or suspected prostate cancer underwent 3-T MRI with a conventional mpMRI protocol and HM-MRI followed by subsequent biopsy between August 2018 and March 2023. Using the HM-MRI tool, tissue composition was calculated using a three-compartment model, and suspected prostate cancer regions with elevated epithelium (>40%) and reduced lumen (<20%) meeting the minimum size requirement of 25 mm were identified. Up to two additional biopsy targets per participant were automatically selected with the HM-MRI tool in addition to the biopsy targets selected based on an expert radiologist's mpMRI interpretation (≥PI-RADS 3) using an MRI/US fusion biopsy device. Additional 12-core transrectal US-guided sextant random biopsy cores were also obtained. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (≥Gleason 3+4) was compared between HM-MRI and mpMRI by calculating area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and diagnostic accuracy metrics. Results The diagnostic performance of HM-MRI was either higher than mpMRI or showed no evidence of a difference when compared with mpMRI. On a per-participant basis, HM-MRI had significantly higher accuracy (55% vs 44%; = .02) and specificity (36% vs 14%: = .002) than mpMRI. On a per-lesion basis, HM-MRI had significantly higher accuracy (58% vs 39%; < .001) and positive predictive value (31% vs 22%; = .004) compared with mpMRI. Only one lesion was missed when using the combination of mpMRI and HM-MRI. On a per-sextant basis, HM-MRI showed significantly better performance than mpMRI for all metrics, including primary end points of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.76 vs 0.65; < .001) and accuracy (83.9% vs 79.0%; = .006). Conclusion This study demonstrates that HM-MRI has the potential to improve MRI/US fusion biopsy results for prostate cancer detection by providing complementary information to PI-RADS-based evaluation by expert radiologists. Prostate Cancer, Hybrid Multidimensional MRI, Multiparametric MRI, PI-RADS Clinical trial registration no. NCT03585660 ©RSNA, 2025.
目的 评估一种基于自动混合多维磁共振成像(HM-MRI)的工具,与专家放射科医生基于前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)的多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)评估相比,在MRI/超声融合活检前前瞻性识别前列腺癌靶点的应用情况。材料与方法 在这项前瞻性临床试验(ClinicalTrials.gov注册号:NCT03585660)中,91名已知或疑似患有前列腺癌的男性参与者(平均年龄65岁±8[标准差])在2018年8月至2023年3月期间接受了3-T磁共振成像检查,采用传统mpMRI协议和HM-MRI,随后进行活检。使用HM-MRI工具,采用三室模型计算组织成分,并识别上皮细胞升高(>40%)和管腔缩小(<20%)且符合最小尺寸要求25 mm的疑似前列腺癌区域。除了基于专家放射科医生对mpMRI的解读(≥PI-RADS 3)使用MRI/超声融合活检设备选择的活检靶点外,每个参与者还使用HM-MRI工具自动选择最多两个额外的活检靶点。还获取了额外的12针经直肠超声引导六分区随机活检针芯。通过计算受试者操作特征曲线下面积和诊断准确性指标,比较HM-MRI和mpMRI对临床显著前列腺癌(≥Gleason 3+4)的检测情况。结果 HM-MRI的诊断性能高于mpMRI,或与mpMRI相比无差异证据。在每个参与者基础上,HM-MRI的准确性(55%对44%;P = .02)和特异性(36%对14%:P = .002)显著高于mpMRI。在每个病灶基础上,与mpMRI相比,HM-MRI的准确性(58%对39%;P < .001)和阳性预测值(31%对22%;P = .004)显著更高。使用mpMRI和HM-MRI联合时仅遗漏了一个病灶。在每个六分区基础上,HM-MRI在所有指标上的表现均显著优于mpMRI,包括受试者操作特征曲线下面积的主要终点(0.76对0.65;P < .001)和准确性(83.9%对79.0%;P = .006)。结论 本研究表明,HM-MRI有潜力通过为专家放射科医生基于PI-RADS的评估提供补充信息,改善MRI/超声融合活检对前列腺癌的检测结果。前列腺癌、混合多维磁共振成像、多参数磁共振成像、PI-RADS 临床试验注册号:NCT03585660 ©RSNA,2025