• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺磁共振成像基本读片者前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-QUAL)评分的观察者间一致性:一项多中心研究。

Inter-reader agreement of the prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL) score for basic readers in prostate MRI: A multi-center study.

机构信息

Acibadem Healthcare Group, Department of Radiology, Istanbul 34457, Turkey.

Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Istanbul 34457, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110923. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110923. Epub 2023 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110923
PMID:37320883
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score is the first step toward image quality assessment in multi-parametric prostate MRI (mpMRI). Previous studies have demonstrated moderate to excellent inter-rater agreement among expert readers; however, there is a need for studies to assess the inter-reader agreement of PI-QUAL scoring in basic prostate readers.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the inter-reader agreement of the PI-QUAL score amongst basic prostate readers on multi-center prostate mpMRI.

METHODS

Five basic prostate readers from different centers assessed the PI-QUAL scores independently using T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and dynamic-contrast-enhanced (DCE) images on mpMRI data obtained from five different centers following Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version 2.1. The inter-reader agreements amongst radiologists for PI-QUAL were evaluated using weighted Cohen's kappa. Further, the absolute agreements in assessing the diagnostic adequacy of each mpMRI sequence were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 355 men with a median age of 71 years (IQR, 60-78) were enrolled in the study. The pair-wise kappa scores ranged from 0.656 to 0.786 for the PI-QUAL scores, indicating good inter-reader agreements between the readers. The pair-wise absolute agreements ranged from 0.75 to 0.88 for T2W imaging, from 0.74 to 0.83 for the ADC maps, and from 0.77 to 0.86 for DCE images.

CONCLUSIONS

Basic prostate radiologists from different institutions provided good inter-reader agreements on multi-center data for the PI-QUAL scores.

摘要

背景

前列腺成像质量(PI-QUAL)评分是多参数前列腺 MRI(mpMRI)中进行图像质量评估的第一步。先前的研究表明,专家读者之间的评分具有中等至极好的一致性;然而,需要研究来评估基本前列腺读者对 PI-QUAL 评分的读者间一致性。

目的

评估多中心前列腺 mpMRI 中基本前列腺读者对 PI-QUAL 评分的读者间一致性。

方法

来自不同中心的五名基本前列腺读者分别对来自五个不同中心的 mpMRI 数据中的 T2 加权图像、扩散加权成像(DWI)包括表观扩散系数(ADC)图和动态对比增强(DCE)图像进行 PI-QUAL 评分。使用加权 Cohen's kappa 评估读者之间 PI-QUAL 的读者间一致性。此外,还计算了评估每个 mpMRI 序列诊断充分性的绝对一致性。

结果

共有 355 名年龄中位数为 71 岁(IQR,60-78)的男性入组本研究。PI-QUAL 评分的两两 kappa 评分范围为 0.656 至 0.786,表明读者之间具有良好的读者间一致性。两两绝对一致性范围为 T2W 成像的 0.75 至 0.88,ADC 图的 0.74 至 0.83,以及 DCE 图像的 0.77 至 0.86。

结论

来自不同机构的基本前列腺放射科医生对多中心数据的 PI-QUAL 评分提供了良好的读者间一致性。

相似文献

1
Inter-reader agreement of the prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL) score for basic readers in prostate MRI: A multi-center study.前列腺磁共振成像基本读片者前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-QUAL)评分的观察者间一致性:一项多中心研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110923. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110923. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
2
Inter-reader agreement of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score: A bicentric study.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-QUAL)评分的读者间一致性:一项双中心研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2022 May;150:110267. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110267. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
3
Inter-reader agreement of the PI-QUAL score for prostate MRI quality in the NeuroSAFE PROOF trial.NeuroSAFE PROOF 试验中前列腺 MRI 质量的 PI-QUAL 评分的读者间一致性。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Feb;32(2):879-889. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08169-1. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
4
Prostate MR image quality of apparent diffusion coefficient maps versus fractional intracellular volume maps from VERDICT MRI using the PI-QUAL score and a dedicated Likert scale for artefacts.使用 PI-QUAL 评分和专用的伪影李克特量表评估 VERDICT MRI 的表观扩散系数图与细胞内分数体积图的前列腺 MR 图像质量。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Nov;168:111109. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111109. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
5
Bridging the experience gap in prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging using artificial intelligence: A prospective multi-reader comparison study on inter-reader agreement in PI-RADS v2.1, image quality and reporting time between novice and expert readers.利用人工智能弥合前列腺多参数磁共振成像经验差距:PI-RADS v2.1 版在新手和专家读者之间的读者间协议、图像质量和报告时间方面的多读者比较前瞻性研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Apr;161:110749. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110749. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
6
Quality assessment of prostate MRI by PI-QUAL score: Inter-reader agreement and impact on prostate cancer local staging at 3 Tesla.基于PI-QUAL评分的前列腺MRI质量评估:3特斯拉下阅片者间的一致性及对前列腺癌局部分期的影响
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110921. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110921. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
7
Impact of PI-QUAL on PI-RADS and cancer yield in an MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy population.PI-QUAL 对 MRI-TRUS 融合活检人群中 PI-RADS 和癌症检出率的影响。
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Sep;154:110431. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110431. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
8
PI-QUAL version 2: A Multi-Reader reproducibility study on multiparametric MRI from a tertiary referral center.PI-QUAL版本2:来自三级转诊中心的多参数MRI多阅片者可重复性研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2024 Dec;181:111716. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111716. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
9
Inter-reader variability and reproducibility of the PI-QUAL score in a multicentre setting.PI-QUAL 评分在多中心环境中的读者间可变性和可重复性。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Nov;168:111091. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111091. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
10
Micro-enema immediately prior to prostate MRI: effects on rectal gas, image quality and PI-QUAL score.前列腺MRI检查前即刻进行微灌肠:对直肠气体、图像质量及PI-QUAL评分的影响
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Apr;50(4):1662-1671. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04617-w. Epub 2024 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in PI-RADS Classification of Prostate Cancer Based on mpMRI Scans Taken 6 Weeks Apart.基于间隔6周进行的多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)扫描的前列腺癌PI-RADS分类差异。
Tomography. 2025 Aug 18;11(8):92. doi: 10.3390/tomography11080092.
2
Artificial intelligence-generated apparent diffusion coefficient (AI-ADC) maps for prostate gland assessment: a multi-reader study.用于前列腺评估的人工智能生成的表观扩散系数(AI-ADC)图:一项多阅片者研究。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11871-z.
3
Multicenter analysis for inter reader agreement of PIQUAL score v2 for basic readers in prostate MRI.
前列腺MRI基础阅片者PIQUAL评分v2的阅片者间一致性多中心分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22865. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02973-1.
4
A Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence in MRI-Guided Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Addressing Key Challenges.磁共振成像引导下前列腺癌诊断中人工智能的叙事性综述:应对关键挑战
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 26;15(11):1342. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15111342.
5
Multiparametric Prostate MRI Accuracy of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (v2.1) Scores 4 and 5: The Influence of Image Quality According to the Prostate Imaging Quality Score.多参数前列腺MRI中前列腺影像报告和数据系统(第2.1版)4分和5分的准确性:根据前列腺影像质量评分的图像质量影响
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 27;13(13):3785. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133785.
6
Impact of prostate MRI image quality on diagnostic performance for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).前列腺 MRI 图像质量对临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)诊断性能的影响。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Nov;49(11):4113-4124. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04458-7. Epub 2024 Jun 27.