• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Hysterectomy for oncological and non-oncological reasons in patients over 70 years.

作者信息

Shahbaz Hunain, Tahir Ibadullah

机构信息

Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 27;19(1):517. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02721-7.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-025-02721-7
PMID:40864341
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Hysterectomy for oncological and non-oncological reasons in patients over 70 years.70岁以上患者因肿瘤及非肿瘤原因进行子宫切除术。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 27;19(1):517. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02721-7.
2
Hysterectomy for oncological and non-oncological reasons in patients over 70 years of age - comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches.70岁以上患者因肿瘤和非肿瘤原因进行子宫切除术——机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放手术方式的比较
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 19;19(1):497. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02676-9.
3
Laparo-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy as a safe option for Minimal Invasive Surgery in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜辅助阴道根治性子宫切除术作为早期宫颈癌微创手术的一种安全选择：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jul;166(1):188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 May 2.
4
Colostomy reversal after oncological resections versus non-oncological resections is not associated with worse postoperative outcomes - the results of the Polish Liquidation of Colostomy (LICO) study.肿瘤切除术后与非肿瘤切除术后的结肠造口还纳与更差的术后结局无关——波兰结肠造口关闭（LICO）研究结果
Pol Przegl Chir. 2025 May 29;97(4):7-12. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0055.1391.
5
Impact of morbid obesity on surgical and oncological outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node staging.病态肥胖对接受机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结分期的子宫内膜癌患者手术及肿瘤学结局的影响。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2025 May;54(5):102947. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.102947. Epub 2025 Mar 30.
6
The impact of hysterectomy on oncological outcomes in patients with borderline ovarian tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫切除术对卵巢交界性肿瘤患者肿瘤学结局的影响：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Apr;165(1):184-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
7
Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy.不同手术入路在早期宫颈癌围手术期发病率的比较：微创与开腹广泛子宫切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Aug;306(2):295-314. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06248-8. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
8
Oncological Outcomes of Stage II Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of 250 Cases.II期子宫内膜癌的肿瘤学结局：250例病例的回顾性分析
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Jan;28(1):161-167. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001133.
9
Comparative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy and Nerve-Sparing Technique in Cervical Cancer Patients.宫颈癌患者腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术与保留神经技术的比较结果
JSLS. 2025 Apr-Jun;29(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00073. Epub 2025 May 13.
10
Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups.早期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术中的保护性手术技术及其对无病和总生存的影响：风险组的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Sep;304(3):577-587. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06082-y. Epub 2021 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Hysterectomy for oncological and non-oncological reasons in patients over 70 years of age - comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches.70岁以上患者因肿瘤和非肿瘤原因进行子宫切除术——机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放手术方式的比较
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 19;19(1):497. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02676-9.
2
Low Geriatric-8 Score as a Potential Risk Factor for Minimally Invasive Surgery in Elderly Patients With Gynecologic Malignancies.低老年综合评估-8评分作为老年妇科恶性肿瘤患者微创手术的潜在危险因素
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;18(1):e70098. doi: 10.1111/ases.70098.
3
Comparison of rapid recovery outcomes between vNOTES hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective study.
单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫切除术快速恢复结局的比较：一项前瞻性研究。
BMC Surg. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02906-9.
4
Trends and outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy among older women.老年女性微创子宫切除术的趋势与结局
Maturitas. 2025 May;196:108244. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108244. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
5
Operative efficiency: a comparative analysis of Versius and da Vinci robotic systems in abdominal surgery.手术效率：Versius 与达芬奇机器人系统在腹部手术中的对比分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 22;18(1):132. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01806-5.
6
A systematic review of full economic evaluations of robotic-assisted surgery in thoracic and abdominopelvic procedures.机器人辅助手术在胸腹部手术中的全经济评估的系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2671-2685. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01731-7. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
7
Functional Improvement Trajectories After Surgery (FIT After Surgery) study: protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study to evaluate significant new disability after major surgery in older adults.术后功能改善轨迹（FIT After Surgery）研究：一项多中心前瞻性队列研究方案，旨在评估老年患者大手术后显著新发残疾的情况。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 22;12(6):e062524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062524.