Buzzi Marie, Moullec Grégory, Kestens Yan, Minary Laetitia, O'Loughlin Jennifer, Lalloué Benoît, Agrinier Nelly, Epstein Jonathan
Université de Lorraine, Inserm, INSPIIRE, F-54000, Nancy, France; CHRU-Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, CIC, Epidémiologie Clinique, Nancy, France.
Centre de Recherche en Santé Publique (CReSP), Montréal, Quebec, Canada; École de Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal (ESPUM), Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Aug 25;187:111937. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111937.
With the growing interest in Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) in mental health research, the need for precise and reliable measurement tools has become a pressing issue. However, few candidate instruments have been validated in intensive longitudinal data collection contexts. The present study provides an example of the psychometric validation of measurement instruments designed for EMA, by assessing the psychometric properties of Ecological Momentary Well-being Instrument (EMoWI), the first scale specifically designed to measure momentary well-being.
Participants from the COvid-19 HEalth and Social InteractiOn in Neighborhoods (COHESION) cohort, a general population sample of Canadian adults, who participated in the September 2022 EMA wave, were included. Prompts including the 8 EMoWI items were sent to participants three times a day, over 10 consecutive days. Based on recent recommendations, we combined Classical Test and Item Response theories to assess content, structural, and construct validity, as well as reliability of EMoWI in an intensive longitudinal data collection context.
Two Hundred Ninety adults aged between 19 and 80 were included, representing a total of 7974 prompts over 10 days. Variance decomposition analysis confirmed significant variability in momentary well-being at both the participant and day levels. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis supported a single factor hypothesis (root mean square error of approximation = 0.074). Internal consistency was high, both at the within- and between-variance level (MacDonald's ω = 0.814 and 0.938, respectively) and we demonstrated longitudinal measurement invariance over time. Variations in mean momentary well-being across subgroups were consistent with our predefined hypotheses, supporting construct validity of EMoWI.
We demonstrated the validity and reliability of EMoWI to measure momentary well-being in intensive longitudinal studies. These results will enhance the accuracy of findings related to well-being in EMA studies and inform the development of evidence-based mental health ecological momentary interventions.
随着心理健康研究领域对生态瞬时评估(EMA)的兴趣日益浓厚,对精确且可靠的测量工具的需求已成为一个紧迫问题。然而,在密集纵向数据收集背景下,经过验证的候选工具寥寥无几。本研究通过评估生态瞬时幸福感量表(EMoWI)的心理测量特性,为专为EMA设计的测量工具的心理测量学验证提供了一个范例,EMoWI是首个专门用于测量瞬时幸福感的量表。
纳入了来自“邻里间新冠疫情健康与社会互动”(COHESION)队列的参与者,该队列是加拿大成年人的一般人群样本,参与了2022年9月的EMA波次。包含8个EMoWI项目的提示信息每天发送给参与者三次,持续10天。基于近期建议,我们结合经典测试理论和项目反应理论,在密集纵向数据收集背景下评估EMoWI的内容效度、结构效度、构想效度以及信度。
纳入了290名年龄在19至80岁之间的成年人,10天内共收到7974条提示信息。方差分解分析证实,在参与者和每日层面,瞬时幸福感均存在显著差异。多水平验证性因素分析支持单因素假设(近似均方根误差 = 0.074)。在方差内和方差间水平,内部一致性均较高(麦克唐纳ω系数分别为0.814和0.938),并且我们证明了随时间的纵向测量不变性。各亚组平均瞬时幸福感的差异与我们预先设定的假设一致,支持了EMoWI的构想效度。
我们证明了EMoWI在密集纵向研究中测量瞬时幸福感的效度和信度。这些结果将提高EMA研究中与幸福感相关的研究结果的准确性,并为基于证据的心理健康生态瞬时干预措施的开发提供参考。