• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定一种前瞻性快速学习方法,以评估在英国一家专科癌症中心将放疗实践改变为纳入肺癌患者新的心脏剂量限制对生存的影响(RAPID-RT):一项方案。

Developing a prospective rapid-learning methodology to evaluate the survival impact of changing radiotherapy practice to include a new heart dose limit for patients with lung cancer in a UK specialist cancer centre (RAPID-RT): a protocol.

作者信息

Fornacon-Wood Isabella, Holley Rebecca, Crawford Harry, Banfill Kathryn, Marchant Tom, Morgan Catharine, Turner-Uaandja Hannah, Walker Abigail, Kontopantelis Evangelos, van Staa Tjeerd, Devaney Sarah, Holm Soren, Price Gareth, Faivre-Finn Corinne

机构信息

Radiotherapy Related Research, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 27;15(8):e105519. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105519.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105519
PMID:40866065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12410672/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The RAPID-RT study is part of a large-scale research programme investigating the use of routinely collected real-world patient data to rapidly and prospectively evaluate and optimise the impact of changes in radiotherapy practice on clinical outcome, an approach often referred to as 'rapid learning'. As a proof of concept, a prospective, observational clinical study using realworld data is embedded within the programme. This study implements a new dose limit to a defined region of the heart in patients with stage I-III lung cancer treated with curative-intent radiotherapy at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust. The RAPID-RT study includes both methodological and clinical objectives. Its primary aim is to assess the feasibility and clinical acceptability of using rapid learning with real-world data to evaluate outcomes following modifications to standard-of-care radiotherapy protocols. This work has the potential to establish rapid learning as a robust, evidence-based approach for the continuous optimisation of radiotherapy workflows.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

RAPID-RT is a series of prospective single-arm observational studies with historic controls that uses only real-world data. A clinical decision was made to implement a dose limit to a specific region of the heart in all patients with stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer treated with curative-intent radiotherapy. The research focuses on using real-world data, the information collected as a part of patients' routine care, to evaluate the impact of this change on overall survival and treatment-related toxicities. The study employs broad inclusion criteria, and data are extracted directly from the electronic patient record. Patients are provided with clear patient information materials and consent for data use via an informed opt-out process. Outcomes for patients treated before and after the introduction of the dose limit are compared using a Bayesian analytical framework to allow sequential updating of results as patients are recruited to the study. Evidence of clinical impact will guide the clinical team in determining whether refinements to the heart dose limit are necessary. These changes will, in turn, be evaluated in subsequent rapid-learning cycles. The RAPID-RT study aims to complete at least two iterative learning cycles to support the continuous optimisation of radiotherapy protocols.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has received ethical approval (REC reference 22/NW/0390) from the North West Haydock Research Ethics Committee, is sponsored by The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and is funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research. The programme management group is supported by an independent programme steering committee, an independent statistical review panel, a clinical management team and patient advisory group. Findings from the RAPID-RT study will be shared widely through conferences, focus groups and a stakeholder event, including a public 'People's Forum' to co-create guiding principles for trusted rapid learning in radiotherapy. In parallel, interviews with participants, professionals and regulators will inform consensus and the development of practical, ethical and legal guidelines to support the adoption of rapid learning across NHS radiotherapy centres.

TRIAL REGISTERATION NUMBER

ISRCTN17129364.

摘要

引言

RAPID-RT研究是一项大规模研究计划的一部分,该计划旨在调查如何利用常规收集的真实世界患者数据,对放疗实践变化对临床结局的影响进行快速前瞻性评估和优化,这种方法通常被称为“快速学习”。作为概念验证,该计划中嵌入了一项使用真实世界数据的前瞻性观察性临床研究。本研究对在克里斯蒂国民保健服务基金会信托医院接受根治性放疗的I-III期肺癌患者的心脏特定区域实施了新的剂量限制。RAPID-RT研究包括方法学和临床目标。其主要目的是评估使用快速学习和真实世界数据来评估对标准护理放疗方案进行修改后的结果的可行性和临床可接受性。这项工作有可能将快速学习确立为一种强大的、基于证据的方法,用于持续优化放疗工作流程。

方法与分析

RAPID-RT是一系列具有历史对照的前瞻性单臂观察性研究,仅使用真实世界数据。临床决定对所有接受根治性放疗的I-III期非小细胞肺癌患者的心脏特定区域实施剂量限制。该研究的重点是利用真实世界数据(作为患者常规护理一部分收集的信息)来评估这一变化对总生存期和治疗相关毒性的影响。该研究采用广泛的纳入标准,数据直接从电子病历中提取。通过知情选择退出程序,为患者提供清晰的患者信息材料并征得其对数据使用的同意。使用贝叶斯分析框架比较引入剂量限制前后治疗患者的结局,以便在患者纳入研究时对结果进行序贯更新。临床影响的证据将指导临床团队确定是否有必要对心脏剂量限制进行调整。反过来,这些调整将在随后的快速学习周期中进行评估。RAPID-RT研究旨在完成至少两个迭代学习周期,以支持放疗方案的持续优化。

伦理与传播

该研究已获得西北海多克研究伦理委员会的伦理批准(研究伦理委员会参考号22/NW/0390),由克里斯蒂国民保健服务基金会信托医院赞助,并由英国国家卫生与保健研究所资助。项目管理小组得到一个独立的项目指导委员会、一个独立的统计审查小组、一个临床管理团队和患者咨询小组的支持。RAPID-RT研究的结果将通过会议、焦点小组和利益相关者活动广泛分享,包括一个公众“人民论坛”,以共同制定放疗中可信快速学习的指导原则。同时,对参与者、专业人员和监管机构的访谈将为达成共识以及制定实用、伦理和法律指南提供信息,以支持国民保健服务放疗中心采用快速学习。

试验注册号

ISRCTN17129364。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1803/12410672/d2a71379551d/bmjopen-15-8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1803/12410672/d2a71379551d/bmjopen-15-8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1803/12410672/d2a71379551d/bmjopen-15-8-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing a prospective rapid-learning methodology to evaluate the survival impact of changing radiotherapy practice to include a new heart dose limit for patients with lung cancer in a UK specialist cancer centre (RAPID-RT): a protocol.制定一种前瞻性快速学习方法,以评估在英国一家专科癌症中心将放疗实践改变为纳入肺癌患者新的心脏剂量限制对生存的影响(RAPID-RT):一项方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 27;15(8):e105519. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105519.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Palliative radiotherapy regimens for patients with thoracic symptoms from non-small cell lung cancer.针对非小细胞肺癌引起胸部症状患者的姑息性放疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 14;1(1):CD002143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002143.pub4.
5
MarkVCID cerebral small vessel consortium: I. Enrollment, clinical, fluid protocols.马克 VCID 脑小血管联盟:一、入组、临床、液体方案。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Apr;17(4):704-715. doi: 10.1002/alz.12215. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
Pharmacist-led DE-eSCALation of opioids post-surgical dischargE (DESCALE) - A multi-centre, non-randomised, feasibility study protocol.药剂师主导的术后出院时阿片类药物降阶梯治疗(DESCALE)——一项多中心、非随机可行性研究方案
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Apr 10;4:48. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13716.2. eCollection 2024.
10
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Consent to Use Real-World Data in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy: Decision of a Citizens' Jury for an 'Informed Opt-Out' Approach.探索肺癌放疗中使用真实世界数据的同意问题:公民陪审团对“知情选择退出”方法的决定
Health Care Anal. 2025 Jun;33(2):192-213. doi: 10.1007/s10728-025-00510-9. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
2
Brief Report of a New Anatomical Region at Risk in Thoracic Radiotherapy: From Discovery to Implementation.胸部放疗中一个新的危险解剖区域的简要报告:从发现到应用
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024 Oct 18;5(12):100742. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100742. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Dosimetric impact of sparing base of heart on organ at risk doses during lung radiotherapy.
在肺部放疗期间,保护心脏底部对危及器官剂量的剂量学影响。
Radiother Oncol. 2025 Jan;202:110654. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110654. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
4
Assessment of heart-substructures auto-contouring accuracy for application in heart-sparing radiotherapy for lung cancer.评估心脏亚结构自动轮廓勾画准确性在肺癌心脏保护放疗中的应用。
BJR Open. 2024 May 8;6(1):tzae006. doi: 10.1093/bjro/tzae006. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
An Overview of Real-World Data Infrastructure for Cancer Research.癌症研究的真实世界数据基础设施概述
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2025 Feb;38:103545. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.03.011. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
6
Demystifying the Results of RTOG 0617: Identification of Dose Sensitive Cardiac Subregions Associated With Overall Survival.解析 RTOG 0617 研究结果:确定与总生存相关的剂量敏感心脏亚区。
J Thorac Oncol. 2023 May;18(5):599-607. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.01.085. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
7
Bayesian methods provide a practical real-world evidence framework for evaluating the impact of changes in radiotherapy.贝叶斯方法为评估放疗变化的影响提供了一个实用的现实世界证据框架。
Radiother Oncol. 2022 Nov;176:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.09.009. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
8
Cardiac Function Modifies the Impact of Heart Base Dose on Survival: A Voxel-Wise Analysis of Patients With Lung Cancer From the PET-Plan Trial.心脏功能改变心脏基剂量对生存的影响:来自PET-Plan试验的肺癌患者体素水平分析。
J Thorac Oncol. 2023 Jan;18(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
9
Understanding the Differences Between Bayesian and Frequentist Statistics.理解贝叶斯统计与频率论统计之间的差异。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Apr 1;112(5):1076-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.011.
10
Can Real-world Data and Rapid Learning Drive Improvements in Lung Cancer Survival? The RAPID-RT Study.真实世界数据与快速学习能否推动肺癌生存率的提高?RAPID-RT研究。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2022 Jun;34(6):407-410. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.12.017. Epub 2022 Jan 6.