Cont-Richter Celine, Stute Nathalie, Galli Anastasia, Schulte Christina, Wojtecki Lars
Department for Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Hospital zum Heiligen Geist, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, 47906 Kempen, Germany.
Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Brain Sci. 2025 Aug 1;15(8):830. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080830.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Neuromodulation is under investigation as a possibly effective add-on therapy in Alzheimer's disease (AD). While transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) has shown positive short-term effects, long-term effects have not yet been fully explored. This study aims to evaluate the long-term feasibility, safety, and potential cognitive benefits of TPS over one year in patients with Alzheimer's disease, focusing on domains such as memory, speech, orientation, visuo-construction, and depressive symptoms.
We analyzed preliminary data from the first ten out of thirty-five patients enrolled in a prospective TPS study who completed one year of follow-up and were included in a dedicated long-term database. The protocol consisted of six initial TPS sessions over two weeks, followed by monthly booster sessions delivering 6000 pulses each for twelve months. Patients underwent regular neuropsychological assessments using the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS), Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). All adverse events (AEs) were documented and monitored throughout the study.
Adverse events occurred in less than 1% of stimulation sessions and mainly included mild focal pain or transient unpleasant sensations, as well as some systemic behavioral or vigilance changes, particularly in patients with underlying medical conditions, with some potentially related to the device's stimulation as adverse device reactions (ADRs). Cognitive test results showed significant improvement after the initial stimulation cycle (ADAS total improved significantly after the first stimulation cycle (M_pre = 28.44, M_post = 18.56; = 0.001, d = 0.80, 95% CI (0.36, 1.25)), with stable scores across all domains over one year. Improvements were most notable in memory, speech, and mood.
TPS appears to be a generally safe and feasible add-on treatment for AD, although careful patient selection and monitoring are advised. While a considerable number of participants were lost to follow-up for various reasons, adverse events and lack of treatment effect were unlikely primary causes. A multifocal stimulation approach (F-TOP2) is proposed to enhance effects across more cognitive domains.
背景/目的:神经调节作为阿尔茨海默病(AD)一种可能有效的辅助治疗方法正在研究中。虽然经颅脉冲刺激(TPS)已显示出短期积极效果,但长期效果尚未得到充分探索。本研究旨在评估TPS对阿尔茨海默病患者一年的长期可行性、安全性及潜在认知益处,重点关注记忆、言语、定向、视觉构建和抑郁症状等领域。
我们分析了一项前瞻性TPS研究中35名患者中前十位患者的初步数据,这些患者完成了一年的随访并被纳入一个专门的长期数据库。方案包括在两周内进行6次初始TPS治疗,随后每月进行一次强化治疗,每次治疗12个月,每次输送6000个脉冲。患者使用阿尔茨海默病评估量表(ADAS)、简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)接受定期神经心理学评估。在整个研究过程中记录并监测所有不良事件(AE)。
不良事件发生在不到1%的刺激治疗中,主要包括轻度局部疼痛或短暂的不适感,以及一些全身性行为或警觉性变化,特别是在有基础疾病的患者中,一些可能与设备刺激有关,属于不良设备反应(ADR)。认知测试结果显示,在初始刺激周期后有显著改善(首次刺激周期后ADAS总分显著改善(M_pre = 28.44,M_post = 18.56; = 0.001,d = 0.80,95%CI(0.36,1.25)),所有领域的分数在一年中保持稳定。在记忆、言语和情绪方面的改善最为显著。
TPS似乎是一种对AD普遍安全可行的辅助治疗方法,尽管建议仔细选择患者并进行监测。虽然相当数量的参与者因各种原因失访,但不良事件和缺乏治疗效果不太可能是主要原因。建议采用多焦点刺激方法(F-TOP2)以增强在更多认知领域的效果。