Joyner Laura, Mackenzie Jay-Marie, Willis Andy, Phillips Penny, Cliffe Bethany, Marsh Ian, Pettersen Elizabeth, Hawton Keith, Marzano Lisa
Department of Psychology, Middlesex University, London NW4 4BT, UK.
School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London W1W 6UW, UK.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 25;15(8):1009. doi: 10.3390/bs15081009.
Understanding the effectiveness of suicide prevention measures for high-risk locations can often be challenging as many rely, at least to some degree, on psychological processes (e.g., engaging with help-seeking behaviours). Establishing how these measures may influence decision-making during a suicide attempt could be helpful for understanding how and when they may be most effective at preventing deaths. In the present work, we consider how suicide prevention measures may influence "goal pursuit" as it unfolds. Drawing on findings from across the suicide prevention literature, we apply the descriptive framework outlined in GOAL Architecture to consider how different measures may shape perceptions of "distance", "time", and "rate of progress" and, in turn, could influence levels of motivational drive associated with specific acts (e.g., "accessing means for suicide"). This is discussed in relation to real-time decisions around accessing means for suicide, avoiding intervention by a third party, and engaging in help-seeking behaviours. As well as the psychological processes that could encourage or prevent an individual from disengaging from a suicide attempt, we also consider potential risks and the influence of person-level factors.
了解针对高风险地点的自杀预防措施的有效性往往具有挑战性,因为许多措施至少在一定程度上依赖于心理过程(例如,参与寻求帮助的行为)。确定这些措施如何在自杀未遂期间影响决策,可能有助于理解它们如何以及何时在预防死亡方面最有效。在本研究中,我们考虑自杀预防措施如何在“目标追求”过程中发挥作用时对其产生影响。借鉴自杀预防文献中的研究结果,我们应用“目标架构”(GOAL Architecture)中概述的描述性框架,来思考不同措施如何塑造对“距离”“时间”和“进展速度”的认知,进而可能影响与特定行为(例如,“获取自杀手段”)相关的动机驱动水平。这将围绕获取自杀手段、避免第三方干预以及寻求帮助行为的实时决策进行讨论。除了可能鼓励或阻止个体放弃自杀企图的心理过程,我们还考虑了潜在风险以及个体层面因素的影响。