• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国政治中的受伤情感与受阻的复杂性:政治两极化和社会距离下的人际创伤

Hurt Feelings and Blocked Complexity in American Politics: Interpersonal Wounds Under Political Polarization and Social Distance.

作者信息

Kam Chris

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Adams State University, Alamosa, CO 81101, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;15(8):1103. doi: 10.3390/bs15081103.

DOI:10.3390/bs15081103
PMID:40867460
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12383109/
Abstract

This study assessed connections between five negative interpersonal feelings with political polarization in America. A total of 203 participants, Democrats and Republicans, were studied to see if their level of feeling hurt, dismissed, misunderstood, offended, and looked down upon was connected with their level of affective polarization, social distance, and integrative complexity. Positive correlations were found amongst all five negative interpersonal feelings and the level of affective polarization and social distance for both party members. Feeling hurt, offended, and looked down upon were negatively correlated with integrative complexity in political issues. Feeling dismissed was a predictor of lower integrative complexity. Implications for future research and real-world application are discussed in the conclusion.

摘要

本研究评估了美国五种负面人际感受与政治两极化之间的联系。共有203名参与者,包括民主党人和共和党人,参与了研究,以考察他们所感受到的受伤害、被忽视、被误解、被冒犯和被轻视的程度,是否与他们的情感两极化程度、社会距离和综合复杂性水平相关。研究发现,对于两党成员而言,所有这五种负面人际感受与情感两极化程度和社会距离之间均存在正相关。在政治问题上,受伤害、被冒犯和被轻视的感受与综合复杂性呈负相关。被忽视的感受是综合复杂性较低的一个预测指标。结论部分讨论了对未来研究和实际应用的启示。

相似文献

1
Hurt Feelings and Blocked Complexity in American Politics: Interpersonal Wounds Under Political Polarization and Social Distance.美国政治中的受伤情感与受阻的复杂性:政治两极化和社会距离下的人际创伤
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;15(8):1103. doi: 10.3390/bs15081103.
2
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Effects of intellectual humility in the context of affective polarization: Approaching and avoiding others in controversial political discussions.情感极化背景下智识谦逊的影响:在有争议的政治讨论中接近和回避他人。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 May 13. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000462.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Are affective states associated with disordered eating behaviors in the daily lives of sexual minority and heterosexual young women?: an ecological momentary assessment study.在性少数群体和异性恋年轻女性的日常生活中,情感状态与饮食失调行为有关联吗?:一项生态瞬时评估研究。
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaf057.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer.针对儿童癌症治疗期间及治疗后的儿童和青少年的体育锻炼训练干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD008796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008796.pub2.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Supports and Barriers to Inclusive Workplaces for LGBTQIA+ Autistic Adults in the United States.美国为LGBTQIA+成年自闭症患者打造包容性工作场所的支持因素与障碍
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):485-494. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0092. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
"It Was Like the Final Piece in the Puzzle for Me": A Qualitative Study on the Experiences of Autistic Women Initially Diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder.“对我来说,这就像拼图中的最后一块”:一项关于最初被诊断为边缘型人格障碍的自闭症女性经历的定性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):428-437. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0031. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing Enneagram Therapy with Contemporary Research on the Conscious and Unconscious Mind.增强九型人格疗法与当代意识和无意识心智研究。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Jun;58(2):711-730. doi: 10.1007/s12124-022-09685-5. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
Feeling offended by clients: The experiences of doctoral student therapists.被客户冒犯的感受:博士生治疗师的体验。
J Couns Psychol. 2021 Mar;68(2):125-138. doi: 10.1037/cou0000511. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
3
Political sectarianism in America.美国的政治宗派主义。
Science. 2020 Oct 30;370(6516):533-536. doi: 10.1126/science.abe1715.
4
The Historical Roots of Visual Analog Scale in Psychology as Revealed by Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy.通过参考文献出版年份光谱学揭示的心理学中视觉模拟量表的历史根源。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Mar 12;13:86. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00086. eCollection 2019.
5
An eight-week mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) workshop increases regulatory choice flexibility.为期八周的正念减压(MBSR)工作坊可提高调节选择的灵活性。
Emotion. 2019 Jun;19(4):593-604. doi: 10.1037/emo0000461. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
6
The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement.用于评分、排序和配对比较的视觉模拟量表(VAS-RRP):一种新的心理测量技术。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Aug;50(4):1694-1715. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1041-8.
7
Feeling Offended: A Blow to Our Image and Our Social Relationships.感到被冒犯:对我们的形象和社会关系的一种打击。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 17;8:2221. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02221. eCollection 2017.
8
How to analyze the Visual Analogue Scale: Myths, truths and clinical relevance.如何分析视觉模拟量表:误区、真相及临床相关性。
Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
9
The self and others in the experience of pride.骄傲体验中的自我与他人。
Cogn Emot. 2018 Mar;32(2):404-413. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1290586. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
10
The Relation Between Contempt, Anger, and Intimate Partner Violence: A Dyadic Approach.轻蔑、愤怒与亲密伴侣暴力之间的关系:一种对偶方法。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Aug;34(15):3059-3079. doi: 10.1177/0886260516665107. Epub 2016 Aug 19.