• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对学龄期失聪学生使用手语的读写能力干预措施的范围综述。

A Scoping Review of Literacy Interventions Using Signed Languages for School-Age Deaf Students.

作者信息

Dostal Hannah M, Scott Jessica A, Chappell Marissa D, Black Christopher

机构信息

Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.

Department of Learning Sciences, College of Education & Human Development, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;15(8):1104. doi: 10.3390/bs15081104.

DOI:10.3390/bs15081104
PMID:40867461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12383669/
Abstract

This scoping review systematically analyzes the nature and implications of existing research on literacy and literacy interventions that use a signed language among deaf students from preschool through college. We identified the findings associated with the use of sign languages on literacy outcomes for deaf students, and we analyzed the scope of the identified studies to uncover potential gaps in the research base. Fifteen empirical studies published between 2014 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria, featuring participants across a range of educational levels. Methodologies varied, with qualitative and group comparison designs most common. Studies addressed key literacy components (i.e., phonological awareness, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, and composition) and findings indicate that integrating sign language into literacy instruction enhances language access and supports literacy learning. The results highlight the importance of responsive, multimodal instruction and point to the need for further research to fill identified gaps.

摘要

本综述性研究系统分析了从学前到大学阶段的聋生中,关于使用手语的读写能力及读写干预的现有研究的性质和影响。我们确定了与聋生使用手语对读写能力结果相关的研究发现,并分析了已确定研究的范围,以揭示研究基础中潜在的差距。2014年至2025年间发表的15项实证研究符合纳入标准,参与者涵盖了一系列教育水平。研究方法各不相同,定性和组间比较设计最为常见。研究涉及关键的读写能力组成部分(即语音意识、流利度、词汇、理解和写作),研究结果表明,将手语融入读写教学可增强语言获取并支持读写学习。结果强调了响应式多模态教学的重要性,并指出需要进一步研究以填补已确定的差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f00/12383669/bd4c11c0f65e/behavsci-15-01104-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f00/12383669/a22256e27b4e/behavsci-15-01104-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f00/12383669/bd4c11c0f65e/behavsci-15-01104-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f00/12383669/a22256e27b4e/behavsci-15-01104-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f00/12383669/bd4c11c0f65e/behavsci-15-01104-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Scoping Review of Literacy Interventions Using Signed Languages for School-Age Deaf Students.一项针对学龄期失聪学生使用手语的读写能力干预措施的范围综述。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;15(8):1104. doi: 10.3390/bs15081104.
2
Phonological Awareness Skills in Thai-Speaking Children: A Scoping Review.说泰语儿童的语音意识技能:一项范围综述
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Sep-Oct;60(5):e70099. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70099.
3
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
4
Literacy and signing deaf students: a multi-national scoping review.读写和手语聋生:一项多国范围综述。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Sep 20;29(4):467-484. doi: 10.1093/jdsade/enae023.
5
Experiences of Autistic Students in Postsecondary Education: A Review of Reviews.自闭症学生在高等教育中的经历:综述之综述
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Aug 11;7(4):367-385. doi: 10.1089/aut.2024.0131. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
7
Vocabulary interventions for second language (L2) learners up to six years of age.词汇干预对第二语言(L2)学习者,最高可达六岁。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 2;8(8):CD014890. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014890.pub2.
8
The impact of educational interventions on food label comprehension and food choices among adolescents: a scoping review.教育干预对青少年食品标签理解及食物选择的影响:一项范围综述
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 6;25(1):2682. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23940-5.
9
eHealth literacy among college students: a systematic review with implications for eHealth education.大学生的电子健康素养:一项对电子健康教育有启示的系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 1;13(4):e102. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1703.
10
Unintended consequences of measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.学校为遏制新冠疫情而采取的措施所产生的意外后果:一项范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD015397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015397.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
What deaf readers can teach us about science of reading: "all means all" isn't an equity framework for literacy.失聪读者能在阅读科学方面给我们的启示:“所有学生都要关注”并非读写能力的公平框架。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2025 Jun 11;30(SI):SI116-SI128. doi: 10.1093/jdsade/enaf030.
2
A comparative study of how teachers communicate in deaf education classrooms.关于教师在聋人教育课堂中沟通方式的比较研究。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Dec 20;30(1):80-93. doi: 10.1093/jdsade/enae043.
3
Explicating the Relationship Between ASL and English in Text Comprehension.
阐释美国手语和英语在文本理解中的关系。
Am Ann Deaf. 2023;167(5):700-726. doi: 10.1353/aad.2023.0008.
4
Chinese Grammatical Development of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children in a Sign Bilingualism and Coenrollment Program.聋人及重听儿童在双语及共班教育方案下的中文语法发展。
Am Ann Deaf. 2023;167(5):675-699. doi: 10.1353/aad.2023.0007.
5
Developing expressive language skills of deaf students through specialized writing instruction.通过专门的写作教学提高聋生的表达性语言技能。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Jun 24;29(3):350-361. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enad065.
6
Chinese Pinyin: Overview, History and Use in Language Learning for Young Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in China.中文拼音:概述、历史及在中国聋和重听学生语言学习中的应用。
Am Ann Deaf. 2021;166(4):446-461. doi: 10.1353/aad.2021.0038.
7
Relationships between cognition and literacy in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童认知与读写能力的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2022 Mar;40(1):130-150. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12395. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
8
A Call for a Diversity of Perspectives in Deaf Education Research: A Response to Mayer and Trezek (2020).呼吁在聋人教育研究中采用多元化视角:对 Mayer 和 Trezek(2020)的回应。
Am Ann Deaf. 2021;166(1):49-61. doi: 10.1353/aad.2021.0010.
9
Early Intervention Protocols: Proposing a Default Bimodal Bilingual Approach for Deaf Children.早期干预方案:为聋童提出默认的双模双语方法
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Nov;24(11):1339-1344. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03005-2. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
10
Implications of a Sight Word Intervention for Deaf Students.视觉词干预对聋生的影响。
Am Ann Deaf. 2020;164(5):592-607. doi: 10.1353/aad.2020.0005.