Suppr超能文献

一项针对学龄期失聪学生使用手语的读写能力干预措施的范围综述。

A Scoping Review of Literacy Interventions Using Signed Languages for School-Age Deaf Students.

作者信息

Dostal Hannah M, Scott Jessica A, Chappell Marissa D, Black Christopher

机构信息

Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.

Department of Learning Sciences, College of Education & Human Development, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;15(8):1104. doi: 10.3390/bs15081104.

Abstract

This scoping review systematically analyzes the nature and implications of existing research on literacy and literacy interventions that use a signed language among deaf students from preschool through college. We identified the findings associated with the use of sign languages on literacy outcomes for deaf students, and we analyzed the scope of the identified studies to uncover potential gaps in the research base. Fifteen empirical studies published between 2014 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria, featuring participants across a range of educational levels. Methodologies varied, with qualitative and group comparison designs most common. Studies addressed key literacy components (i.e., phonological awareness, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, and composition) and findings indicate that integrating sign language into literacy instruction enhances language access and supports literacy learning. The results highlight the importance of responsive, multimodal instruction and point to the need for further research to fill identified gaps.

摘要

本综述性研究系统分析了从学前到大学阶段的聋生中,关于使用手语的读写能力及读写干预的现有研究的性质和影响。我们确定了与聋生使用手语对读写能力结果相关的研究发现,并分析了已确定研究的范围,以揭示研究基础中潜在的差距。2014年至2025年间发表的15项实证研究符合纳入标准,参与者涵盖了一系列教育水平。研究方法各不相同,定性和组间比较设计最为常见。研究涉及关键的读写能力组成部分(即语音意识、流利度、词汇、理解和写作),研究结果表明,将手语融入读写教学可增强语言获取并支持读写学习。结果强调了响应式多模态教学的重要性,并指出需要进一步研究以填补已确定的差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f00/12383669/a22256e27b4e/behavsci-15-01104-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Scoping Review of Literacy Interventions Using Signed Languages for School-Age Deaf Students.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;15(8):1104. doi: 10.3390/bs15081104.
2
Phonological Awareness Skills in Thai-Speaking Children: A Scoping Review.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Sep-Oct;60(5):e70099. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70099.
3
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
4
Literacy and signing deaf students: a multi-national scoping review.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Sep 20;29(4):467-484. doi: 10.1093/jdsade/enae023.
5
Experiences of Autistic Students in Postsecondary Education: A Review of Reviews.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Aug 11;7(4):367-385. doi: 10.1089/aut.2024.0131. eCollection 2025 Aug.
7
Vocabulary interventions for second language (L2) learners up to six years of age.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 2;8(8):CD014890. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014890.pub2.
10
Unintended consequences of measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD015397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015397.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
What deaf readers can teach us about science of reading: "all means all" isn't an equity framework for literacy.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2025 Jun 11;30(SI):SI116-SI128. doi: 10.1093/jdsade/enaf030.
2
A comparative study of how teachers communicate in deaf education classrooms.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Dec 20;30(1):80-93. doi: 10.1093/jdsade/enae043.
3
Explicating the Relationship Between ASL and English in Text Comprehension.
Am Ann Deaf. 2023;167(5):700-726. doi: 10.1353/aad.2023.0008.
5
Developing expressive language skills of deaf students through specialized writing instruction.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Jun 24;29(3):350-361. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enad065.
9
Early Intervention Protocols: Proposing a Default Bimodal Bilingual Approach for Deaf Children.
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Nov;24(11):1339-1344. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03005-2. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
10
Implications of a Sight Word Intervention for Deaf Students.
Am Ann Deaf. 2020;164(5):592-607. doi: 10.1353/aad.2020.0005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验