Chiang Ping-Hao, Lin Yang-Chi, Huang Jing-Yang, Wu Yun-Che
Department of Medical Education, Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 613016, Taiwan.
Department of Medical Education, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan.
Life (Basel). 2025 Aug 20;15(8):1326. doi: 10.3390/life15081326.
This study aimed to determine whether prior use of a beta blocker (BB) is associated with the three-year risk of total hip arthroplasty after being diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the hip and compare risks across BB subtypes.
Through the TriNetX database, patients with hip OA were included and further divided into the with- and without-BB cohorts. BB users were defined as patients with prescriptions between 1 day and 1 year before hip OA diagnosis and at least one refill afterward. The index date was defined as the diagnosis date of hip OA. Moreover, the BB cohorts were split to evaluate the difference between different types of beta-blocking agents. After propensity score matching, a three-year risk of undergoing THA was calculated.
A total of 313,430 patients were involved in this study, including 23,580 with BB usage, and 289,850 without. After propensity score matching, 23,096 patients remained in each cohort. For the with- and without-BB cohort, the average ages were 69 ± 11.9 and 63.3 ± 11.4, with a majority being female (52.4% vs. 56%). After the three-year follow-up, the use of BBs (2333 vs. 1539, HR = 1.494; 95% C.I. = 1.4-1.593) was associated with a higher risk of undergoing THA. Furthermore, among the three types of BBs, the use of alpha-BBs showed the highest hazard ratio when compared to the without-BB cohort (788 vs. 470, HR = 1.639; 95% C.I. = 1.462-1.837).
These findings suggest a potential association between BB use and hip arthroplasty in OA patients, warranting further investigation rather than immediate changes in clinical practice. Exploration into the detailed mechanisms is warranted and merits investigation in future studies.
本研究旨在确定髋骨关节炎诊断前使用β受体阻滞剂(BB)是否与全髋关节置换术的三年风险相关,并比较不同BB亚型的风险。
通过TriNetX数据库纳入髋骨关节炎患者,并进一步分为使用BB和未使用BB的队列。BB使用者定义为在髋骨关节炎诊断前1天至1年有处方且之后至少有一次再开处方的患者。索引日期定义为髋骨关节炎的诊断日期。此外,将BB队列进行拆分以评估不同类型β受体阻滞剂之间的差异。在倾向得分匹配后,计算接受全髋关节置换术的三年风险。
本研究共纳入313430例患者,其中23580例使用BB,289850例未使用。倾向得分匹配后,每个队列各有23096例患者。使用BB和未使用BB的队列中,平均年龄分别为69±11.9岁和63.3±11.4岁,大多数为女性(52.4%对56%)。三年随访后,使用BB与接受全髋关节置换术的风险较高相关(2333例对1539例,HR = 1.494;95%CI = 1.4 - 1.593)。此外,在三种类型的BB中,与未使用BB的队列相比,使用α - BB的风险比最高(788例对470例,HR = 1.639;95%CI = 1.462 - 1.837)。
这些发现表明OA患者使用BB与髋关节置换术之间可能存在关联,需要进一步研究,而非立即改变临床实践。有必要深入探讨详细机制,值得在未来研究中进行调查。