Ohnewein Bernhard, Shomanova Zornitsa, Jirak Peter, Paar Vera, Topf Albert, Pylypenko Lidia, Schäbinger Max, Volg Fabian, Hoppe Uta C, Pistulli Rudin, Zagidullin Naufal, Lichtenauer Michael, Motloch Lukas J
Department of Internal Medicine II, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 11;14(16):5668. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165668.
Despite improvements in medical therapy, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a major burden on the healthcare system and remains a leading cause of death with a 5-year mortality rate of more than 60%. Novel therapeutic agents such as angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin-inhibitors (ARNIs) lead to significant improvement in clinical outcomes. Optimal therapy monitoring under these novel drugs is crucial for improving the outcome. In this trial, the diagnostic potential of four novel cardiovascular biomarkers-GDF-15, sST2, H-FABP, and suPAR-was evaluated during follow-up in patients with HFrEF. In this prospective cohort pilot study, 70 patients with HFrEF with ischemic (n = 34) and non-ischemic (n = 36) origin were included. All included patients were on a stable treatment regimen and in a non-decompensated state. The clinical parameters NYHA class, LVEF, MPI/Tei index and ESC Score 2 and the laboratory parameters sST2 (remodeling, inflammation), GDF-15 (remodeling, inflammation), H-FABP (subclinical ischemia and ischemia), suPAR (remodeling, inflammation) and NT-proBNP were assessed before ARNI therapy initiation and at 3 to 6 months at follow-up. Before starting ARNI therapy with sacubitril/valsartan patients had stable and well-established heart failure therapy. There was a sufficient response to therapy with significant improvement in ejection fraction from 29.9% to 38.5% ( < 0.001) and a significant decrease in NT-proBNP from 1402 pg/mL to 572.0 pg/mL ( = 0.003). Interestingly, along with that, a significant increase in sST2 levels from 9602 pg/mL to 12,001 pg/mL ( = 0.039) but no significant change in H-FABP ( = 0.397), GDF-15 ( = 0.382) or suPAR ( = 0.328) were observed. Furthermore, the baseline sST2 level correlated with the risk of cardiovascular events calculated with the ESC Score 2 and the GDF15 level at follow-up correlated with the right ventricular global function, assessed with the MPI/Tei index and this correlation persisted after correction for confounders ( = 0.323, = 0.039; = 0.504, = 0.011). The novel biomarker sST2 but not H-FABP, GDF-15 and suPAR was significantly affected by medical therapy with ARNIs. Monitoring sST2 might offer new opportunities for therapy guidance and disease management. However, these results are hypothesis generating and should be interpreted with caution, given the pilot nature of this study.
尽管药物治疗有所改善,但射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)仍是医疗系统的重大负担,仍然是主要死因,5年死亡率超过60%。新型治疗药物如血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNI)可显著改善临床结局。在这些新药治疗下进行最佳治疗监测对于改善预后至关重要。在本试验中,对4种新型心血管生物标志物——生长分化因子15(GDF-15)、可溶性ST2(sST2)、心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白(H-FABP)和可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(suPAR)在HFrEF患者随访期间的诊断潜力进行了评估。在这项前瞻性队列试点研究中,纳入了70例HFrEF患者,其病因包括缺血性(n = 34)和非缺血性(n = 36)。所有纳入患者均采用稳定的治疗方案且处于非失代偿状态。在开始ARNI治疗前以及随访3至6个月时,评估了临床参数纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、心肌性能指数/Tei指数和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)评分2,以及实验室参数sST2(重塑、炎症)、GDF-15(重塑、炎症)、H-FABP(亚临床缺血和缺血)、suPAR(重塑、炎症)和N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP)。在用沙库巴曲/缬沙坦开始ARNI治疗前,患者已有稳定且成熟的心力衰竭治疗方案。治疗反应充分,射血分数从29.9%显著提高至38.5%(P < 0.001),NT-proBNP从1402 pg/mL显著降至572.0 pg/mL(P = 0.003)。有趣的是,与此同时,观察到sST2水平从9602 pg/mL显著升高至12,001 pg/mL(P = 0.039),但H-FABP(P = 0.397)、GDF-15(P = 0.382)或suPAR(P = 0.328)无显著变化。此外,基线sST2水平与用ESC评分2计算的心血管事件风险相关,随访时GDF15水平与用MPI/Tei指数评估的右心室整体功能相关,在校正混杂因素后这种相关性仍然存在(P = 0.323,P = 0.039;P = 0.504,P = 0.011)。新型生物标志物sST2而非H-FABP、GDF-15和suPAR受到ARNI药物治疗的显著影响。监测sST2可能为治疗指导和疾病管理提供新机会。然而,鉴于本研究的试点性质,这些结果只是初步的,应谨慎解读。