• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“超声辅助高流体动力学超声乳化术”:一种在手动或飞秒激光扇形晶状体破碎后,通过2.2毫米微型切口和1.6毫米微切口对晶状体核象限进行处理的高效安全技术。

"Ultrasound-Assisted High-Fluidics Phacoaspiration": An Efficient and Safe Technique for Nucleus Quadrant Workup Through 2.2 mm Mini- and 1.6 mm Micro-Incisions Following Manual or Femtosecond Laser Sectorial Lens Fragmentation.

作者信息

Menapace Rupert Michael, Schriefl Sabine, Di Nardo Silvio

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

Institute of Medical Engineering, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Art, CH-6048 Horw, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 20;14(16):5887. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165887.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14165887
PMID:40869713
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12387371/
Abstract

: To evaluate the efficiency and safety of high-fluidics ultrasound emulsification using slim-shaft-strong-bevel (SSSB) tip technology for nucleus workup through mini- and micro-incisions. : 77 patients underwent immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery using high-flow-high-vacuum easyTip2.2 ("eT2.2") or infusion-assisted ("Hybrid") easyTipCOMICS ("eT1.6 iaCOMICS") coaxial phacoemulsification. Surgical time (ST), Effective Phacoemulsification Time (EPT), and fluid consumption (FC), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell count (ECC) were recorded. : 50 patients completed the 6 months follow-up. Preoperatively, groups did not differ in nuclear hardness, CCT, or ECC. The median ST for Conquer with eT2.2 phaco was 49 s, with eT1.6 iaCOMICS phaco 57 s ( = 0.021). The median total EPT was 8.3 and 8.0 ( = 0.882), and the median EPT for Conquer was 4.0 and 4.1, respectively ( = 0.812). The median FC for Conquer was 21 mL with the eT2.2 and 22 mL with the eT1.6 iaCOMICS phaco ( = 0.29), and the overall FC was 29 mL and 33 mL, respectively ( = 0.105). Mean CCT was 561 ± 42 µm and 563 ± 45 µm on day 1 ( = 0.835), 539 ± 33 µm and 542 ± 34 µm at 1 week ( = 0.714), and 536 ± 31 µm and 541 ± 33 µm at 6 months ( = 0.55), respectively. Mean ECL at 6 months was 2.80 ± 7.28% and 3.41 ± 8.25% ( = 0.725). : When compared to previously published results obtained with a standard non-waisted phaco needle and lower fluidics and with the waisted easyTip2.2 run with intermediate fluidics, ultrasound-assisted high-fluidics phacoaspiration with the easyTip2.2 through a 2.2 mm incision and the easyTip COMICS through a 1.6 mm incision with infusion-assistance significantly improved efficiency of nucleus workup by reducing ultrasound energy and infusion fluid consumption, with minimal transient corneal stroma swelling and low endothelial cell loss.

摘要

评估使用细轴强斜面(SSSB)尖端技术的高流量超声乳化术通过微小切口和微切口进行核处理的效率和安全性。77例患者接受了使用高流量高真空easyTip2.2(“eT2.2”)或输注辅助(“Hybrid”)easyTipCOMICS(“eT1.6 iaCOMICS”)同轴超声乳化术的即时序贯双侧白内障手术。记录手术时间(ST)、有效超声乳化时间(EPT)、液体消耗量(FC)、中央角膜厚度(CCT)和内皮细胞计数(ECC)。50例患者完成了6个月的随访。术前,两组在核硬度、CCT或ECC方面无差异。使用eT2.2超声乳化术进行Conquer的中位ST为49秒,使用eT1.6 iaCOMICS超声乳化术为57秒(P = 0.021)。总中位EPT分别为8.3和8.0(P = 0.882),Conquer的中位EPT分别为4.0和4.1(P = 0.812)。使用eT2.2进行Conquer的中位FC为21 mL,使用eT1.6 iaCOMICS超声乳化术为22 mL(P = 0.29),总体FC分别为29 mL和33 mL(P = 0.105)。第1天的平均CCT分别为561±42 µm和563±45 µm(P = 0.835),1周时为539±33 µm和542±34 µm(P = 0.714),6个月时为536±31 µm和541±33 µm(P = 0.55)。6个月时的平均ECL分别为2.80±7.28%和3.41±8.25%(P = 0.725)。与先前发表的使用标准无腰超声乳化针和较低流量以及使用中等流量的有腰easyTip2.2获得的结果相比,通过2.2 mm切口使用easyTip2.2和通过1.6 mm切口使用带输注辅助的easyTip COMICS进行超声辅助高流量超声乳化吸出术通过减少超声能量和输注液体消耗显著提高了核处理效率,角膜基质短暂肿胀最小且内皮细胞损失低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e697/12387371/6b46a7ce9a1d/jcm-14-05887-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e697/12387371/f91a719faeea/jcm-14-05887-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e697/12387371/6e5f6b313986/jcm-14-05887-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e697/12387371/5aa50928af79/jcm-14-05887-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e697/12387371/30f744b142c4/jcm-14-05887-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e697/12387371/9ffde039199c/jcm-14-05887-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e697/12387371/6b46a7ce9a1d/jcm-14-05887-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e697/12387371/f91a719faeea/jcm-14-05887-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e697/12387371/6e5f6b313986/jcm-14-05887-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e697/12387371/5aa50928af79/jcm-14-05887-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e697/12387371/30f744b142c4/jcm-14-05887-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e697/12387371/9ffde039199c/jcm-14-05887-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e697/12387371/6b46a7ce9a1d/jcm-14-05887-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
"Ultrasound-Assisted High-Fluidics Phacoaspiration": An Efficient and Safe Technique for Nucleus Quadrant Workup Through 2.2 mm Mini- and 1.6 mm Micro-Incisions Following Manual or Femtosecond Laser Sectorial Lens Fragmentation.“超声辅助高流体动力学超声乳化术”:一种在手动或飞秒激光扇形晶状体破碎后,通过2.2毫米微型切口和1.6毫米微切口对晶状体核象限进行处理的高效安全技术。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 20;14(16):5887. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165887.
2
Different-sized incisions for phacoemulsification in age-related cataract.年龄相关性白内障超声乳化手术中不同大小切口的研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 20;9(9):CD010510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010510.pub2.
3
Impact of different clear corneal incision sizes on anterior corneal aberration for cataract surgery.不同透明角膜切口大小对白内障手术前角膜像差的影响。
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2020 Nov-Dec;83(6):478-484. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20200089.
4
Laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery.激光辅助白内障手术与标准超声乳化白内障手术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 23;6(6):CD010735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010735.pub3.
5
Laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery.激光辅助白内障手术与标准超声乳化白内障手术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 8;7(7):CD010735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010735.pub2.
6
Phacoemulsification using an active fluidics system at physiologic vs high intraocular pressure: impact on anterior and posterior segment physiology.在生理眼压与高眼压下使用主动液流系统行超声乳化白内障吸除术:对眼前段和眼后段生理的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Aug 1;50(8):822-827. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001457.
7
Ultrasound energy consumption and macular changes with manual and femtolaser-assisted high-fluidics cataract surgery: a prospective randomized comparison.超声能量消耗与手动和飞秒激光辅助高水力学白内障手术的黄斑变化:一项前瞻性随机比较。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;100(2):e414-e422. doi: 10.1111/aos.14983. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
8
The effect of intraocular pressure during phacoemulsification in patients with either diabetic retinopathy or glaucoma; a randomized controlled feasibility trial.糖尿病视网膜病变或青光眼患者白内障超声乳化术中眼压的影响:一项随机对照可行性试验。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06839-0.
9
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
10
Altered dietary salt intake for preventing diabetic kidney disease and its progression.改变膳食盐摄入量以预防糖尿病肾病及其进展。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 16;1(1):CD006763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006763.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Corneal endothelium protection provided by ophthalmic viscosurgical devices during phacoemulsification: experimental study in rabbit eyes.白内障超声乳化术中眼科粘弹剂对角膜内皮的保护作用:兔眼实验研究
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Dec 1;48(12):1440-1445. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001052.
2
Comparative anatomical outcomes of high-flow vs. low-flow phacoemulsification cataract surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高流量与低流量超声乳化白内障手术的比较解剖学结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 28;9:1021941. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1021941. eCollection 2022.
3
Effect of simulated lenticular debris on corneal endothelial cells: experimental study in rabbit eyes.
模拟晶状体碎片对角膜内皮细胞的影响:兔眼的实验研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Nov 1;48(11):1325-1330. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001032.
4
Ultrasound energy consumption and macular changes with manual and femtolaser-assisted high-fluidics cataract surgery: a prospective randomized comparison.超声能量消耗与手动和飞秒激光辅助高水力学白内障手术的黄斑变化:一项前瞻性随机比较。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;100(2):e414-e422. doi: 10.1111/aos.14983. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
5
Effect of phacoemulsification fluid flow on the corneal endothelium: experimental study in rabbit eyes.超声乳化液流对兔眼角膜内皮细胞的影响:实验研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Apr 1;48(4):481-486. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000768.
6
Comparison of phacoemulsification cataract surgery with low versus standard fluidic settings and the impact on postoperative parameters.低流量与标准流量设置下的白内障超声乳化手术比较及其对术后参数的影响。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan 19;27(1):39-44. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000813. Epub 2016 May 31.
7
Effect of fluidics on corneal endothelial cell density, central corneal thickness, and central macular thickness after phacoemulsification with torsional ultrasound.扭转超声乳化术后流体力学对角膜内皮细胞密度、中央角膜厚度和中央黄斑厚度的影响。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;63(8):641-4. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.169786.
8
Impact of low versus high fluidic settings on the efficacy and safety of phacoemulsification.低与高流体设置对超声乳化效能和安全性的影响。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;92(6):e454-7. doi: 10.1111/aos.12200. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
9
The comparison between torsional and conventional mode phacoemulsification in moderate and hard cataracts.中度和硬核白内障中扭转模式与传统模式超声乳化术的比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;24(6):336-40. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2010.24.6.336. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
10
Comparison of endothelial changes and power settings between torsional and longitudinal phacoemulsification.扭转和纵向超声乳化白内障吸除术中内皮细胞变化和功率设置的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Nov;36(11):1855-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.06.060.