• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扭转和纵向超声乳化白内障吸除术中内皮细胞变化和功率设置的比较。

Comparison of endothelial changes and power settings between torsional and longitudinal phacoemulsification.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Nov;36(11):1855-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.06.060.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.06.060
PMID:21029892
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of conventional longitudinal phacoemulsification and torsional phacoemulsification.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Leipzig, Germany.

DESIGN

Randomized single-center clinical trial.

METHODS

Eyes with senile cataract were randomized to have phacoemulsification using the Infiniti Vision System and the torsional mode (OZil) or conventional longitudinal mode. Primary outcomes were corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and central endothelial cell density (ECD), calculated according to the Conference on Harmonisation-E9 Guidelines in which missing values were substituted by the median in each group (primary analysis) and the loss was then calculated using actual data (secondary analysis). Secondary outcomes were ultrasound (US) time, cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), and percentage total equivalent power in position 3. Postoperative follow-up was at 3 months.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative CDVA was 0.41 logMAR in the torsional group and 0.38 logMAR in the longitudinal group, improving to 0.07 logMAR postoperatively in both groups. The mean ECD loss was 7.2% ± 4.6% in the torsional group (72 patients) and 7.1% ± 4.4% in the longitudinal group (76 patients), with no statistically significant differences in the primary analysis (P = .342) or secondary analysis (P = .906). The mean US time, CDE, and percentage total equivalent power in position 3 were statistically significantly lower in the torsional group (98 patients) than in the longitudinal group (94 patients) (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

The torsional mode was as safe as the longitudinal mode in phacoemulsification for age-related cataract.

摘要

目的

比较传统的纵向超声乳化和扭转超声乳化的术中及术后结果。

地点

德国莱比锡大学眼科系。

设计

随机单中心临床试验。

方法

将老年性白内障患者随机分为使用 Infiniti 视觉系统和扭转模式(OZil)或传统纵向模式进行超声乳化组。主要结局是矫正远视力(CDVA)和中央角膜内皮细胞密度(ECD),根据协调会议 E9 指南计算,其中每个组的缺失值用中位数代替(主要分析),然后使用实际数据计算损失(次要分析)。次要结局是超声(US)时间、累积耗散能量(CDE)和位置 3 的总等效功率百分比。术后随访 3 个月。

结果

扭转组术前 CDVA 平均为 0.41 logMAR,纵向组为 0.38 logMAR,两组术后均提高至 0.07 logMAR。扭转组角膜内皮细胞密度损失平均为 7.2%±4.6%(72 例),纵向组为 7.1%±4.4%(76 例),主要分析(P =.342)或次要分析(P =.906)均无统计学差异。扭转组(98 例)的超声时间、CDE 和位置 3 的总等效功率百分比均明显低于纵向组(94 例)(P<.001)。

结论

在年龄相关性白内障的超声乳化中,扭转模式与纵向模式一样安全。

相似文献

1
Comparison of endothelial changes and power settings between torsional and longitudinal phacoemulsification.扭转和纵向超声乳化白内障吸除术中内皮细胞变化和功率设置的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Nov;36(11):1855-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.06.060.
2
Endothelial cell loss: Biaxial small-incision torsional phacoemulsification versus biaxial small-incision longitudinal phacoemulsification.内皮细胞丢失:双轴小切口扭转式超声乳化白内障吸除术与双轴小切口纵行式超声乳化白内障吸除术的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Nov;38(11):1918-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.06.051. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
3
Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.经1.8毫米微小切口同轴超声乳化术与经1.7毫米微小切口双手超声乳化术后早期角膜内皮细胞损失的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;35(9):1570-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.014.
4
Intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes of microcoaxial phacoemulsification. Observational study.微同轴超声乳化术的术中表现及术后结果。观察性研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Jun;33(6):1019-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.02.029.
5
Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery in complicated cases.双眼微切口与同轴小切口白内障手术治疗复杂病例的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jan;36(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.07.036.
6
New endothelial keratoplasty, phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens implantation triple procedure: comparison with conventional triple procedure.新型内皮角膜移植术、白内障超声乳化吸除术及人工晶状体植入三联手术:与传统三联手术的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jul;36(7):1142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.01.022.
7
Endothelial cell loss secondary to two different phacoemulsification techniques.两种不同超声乳化技术继发的内皮细胞丢失
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998 Nov;29(11):890-5.
8
Comparison of outcomes of primary scleral-fixated versus primary anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in complicated cataract surgeries.复杂白内障手术中一期巩膜固定与一期前房人工晶状体植入术的效果比较。
Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):80-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.024. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
9
Bimanual microphacoemulsification versus coaxial miniphacoemulsification: prospective study.双手微切口白内障超声乳化术与同轴微切口白内障超声乳化术的前瞻性研究
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Mar;33(3):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.11.016.
10
Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.微同轴白内障手术效果:1.8毫米系统与2.2毫米系统的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 May;35(5):874-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.031.

引用本文的文献

1
"Ultrasound-Assisted High-Fluidics Phacoaspiration": An Efficient and Safe Technique for Nucleus Quadrant Workup Through 2.2 mm Mini- and 1.6 mm Micro-Incisions Following Manual or Femtosecond Laser Sectorial Lens Fragmentation.“超声辅助高流体动力学超声乳化术”:一种在手动或飞秒激光扇形晶状体破碎后,通过2.2毫米微型切口和1.6毫米微切口对晶状体核象限进行处理的高效安全技术。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 20;14(16):5887. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165887.
2
Effect of anterior chamber depth on corneal endothelium following phacoemulsification among patients with different axial lengths.不同眼轴长度患者白内障超声乳化术后前房深度对角膜内皮的影响。
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 29;45(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03415-7.
3
Comparative Clinical Study of Surgical Performance of Quatera 700 versus Centurion and Signature Pro Phacoemulsification Systems.
Quatera 700与Centurion及Signature Pro超声乳化系统手术性能的比较临床研究
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 23;18:2685-2695. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S456660. eCollection 2024.
4
25G Pars Plana Vitrectomy-Lensectomy and Sulcus IOL Implantation for Patients with Cataract and Cornea Guttata.25G经睫状体平坦部玻璃体切割术-晶状体切除术联合睫状沟人工晶状体植入术治疗白内障合并角膜滴状变性患者
Maedica (Bucur). 2024 Mar;19(1):42-47. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2024.19.1.42.
5
The use of lens anterior capsule disc for corneal endothelium protection during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in eyes with low endothelial cell density.低内皮细胞密度眼飞秒激光辅助白内障手术中使用晶状体前囊盘保护角膜内皮。
Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2024 Feb 28;4(2):65-68. doi: 10.1016/j.aopr.2024.02.002. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
6
Narrative review after post-hoc trial analysis of factors that predict corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification: Tips for improving cataract surgery research.白内障超声乳化术后预测角膜内皮细胞丢失的事后试验分析因素的叙述性综述:改善白内障手术研究的技巧。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 21;19(3):e0298795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298795. eCollection 2024.
7
Endothelial Cell Loss Following Cataract Surgery Using Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorhexis or Precision Pulse Capsulotomy.白内障手术中使用连续环形撕囊或精准脉冲截囊术后的内皮细胞丢失
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun 16;17:1701-1708. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S411454. eCollection 2023.
8
Corneal structure and endothelial morphological changes after uneventful phacoemulsification in type 2 diabetic and nondiabetic patients.2 型糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者行超声乳化白内障吸除术后角膜结构和内皮形态的变化。
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2021 Sep 20;84(5):454-461. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20210071. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparison of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery and Conventional Phacoemulsification in Shallow Anterior Chambers and Glaucoma.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术在浅前房和青光眼患者中的比较
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov 16;2020:3690528. doi: 10.1155/2020/3690528. eCollection 2020.
10
Phacoemulsification vs manual small incision cataract surgery in eyes affected by pseudo exfoliation syndrome with grade II and III cataracts.超声乳化术与手法小切口白内障手术治疗伴有Ⅱ级和Ⅲ级白内障的假性剥脱综合征患者的疗效比较
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov 22;34(1):18-24. doi: 10.4103/1319-4534.301292. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.