Cadena-Povea Henry, Hernández-Martínez Marco, Bastidas-Amador Gabriela, Torres-Andrade Hugo
Facultad de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Ibarra 100105, Ecuador.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 1;22(8):1214. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081214.
Burnout syndrome is a growing concern in higher education, affecting the psychological well-being and performance of university professors. This systematic review presents a narrative synthesis of findings from quantitative studies on sociodemographic and psychosocial determinants of academic burnout. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, sixty peer-reviewed articles published between Jan 2019 and May 2024 were selected from Scopus and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria required validated psychometric instruments and exclusive focus on university faculty. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and CASP checklist. Data from approximately 43,639 academic staff were analyzed. Key risk factors identified include excessive workload, lack of institutional support, and workplace conflict. In contrast, collegial support, participative leadership, and job satisfaction functioned as protective elements. Variables such as age, gender, academic rank, and employment stability significantly influenced burnout vulnerability. While general patterns were observed across studies, differences in design and sampling require caution in generalization. The evidence supports the implementation of integrated strategies encompassing mental health programs, workload regulation, participatory governance, and culturally responsive approaches. These findings inform the development of institutional policies aimed at preventing burnout and fostering academic well-being. Future research should adopt longitudinal and cross-cultural designs to further explore burnout trajectories and support educational reform.
职业倦怠综合征在高等教育领域日益受到关注,它影响着大学教授的心理健康和工作表现。本系统综述对关于学术倦怠的社会人口学和心理社会决定因素的定量研究结果进行了叙述性综合分析。按照PRISMA 2020指南,从Scopus和科学网中选取了2019年1月至2024年5月期间发表的60篇同行评议文章。纳入标准要求使用经过验证的心理测量工具且专门关注大学教师。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和CASP清单评估方法学质量。对约43,639名学术人员的数据进行了分析。确定的关键风险因素包括工作量过大、缺乏机构支持和工作场所冲突。相比之下,同事支持、参与式领导和工作满意度起到了保护作用。年龄、性别、学术职级和就业稳定性等变量对倦怠易感性有显著影响。虽然各项研究观察到了总体模式,但设计和抽样方面的差异需要谨慎进行概括。证据支持实施包括心理健康项目、工作量调节、参与式治理和文化响应方法在内的综合策略。这些发现为旨在预防倦怠和促进学术幸福感的机构政策制定提供了参考。未来的研究应采用纵向和跨文化设计,以进一步探索倦怠轨迹并支持教育改革。