Casal-Guisande Cristina, López-Domene Esperanza, Fernández-Antorrena Silvia, Fernández-García Alberto, Torres-Durán María, Casal-Guisande Manuel, Fernández-Villar Alberto
Emergency Department, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Spain.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University Alfonso X el Sabio, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Spain.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 22;61(8):1321. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081321.
: Peripheral vascular access in infants is a frequent but technically challenging procedure due to the anatomical characteristics of this population. Repeated failed attempts may increase complications and emotional stress for both patients and healthcare professionals. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided peripheral vascular cannulation compared to the conventional or "blind" technique in infants. : A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed database was searched for studies published between 2017 and 2025. Studies comparing both techniques in infants under two years of age were selected, evaluating variables such as the number of punctures, first-attempt success, healthcare staff perception, associated stress, and the role of simulation in training. : Eleven studies were included, comprising clinical trials, observational studies, and training program assessments from different countries. Most reported a higher first-attempt success rate with the ultrasound-guided technique (often exceeding 85%), along with fewer punctures and complications, particularly among less-experienced professionals. Improvements in staff perception were also observed following structured training. The impact on stress experienced by patients and families was less frequently assessed directly, although some studies reported indirect benefits. : Ultrasound-guided peripheral vascular cannulation appears to be more effective and safer than the conventional technique in infants, particularly in complex or critical care contexts. Its implementation requires specific training and appropriate resources but could significantly improve clinical outcomes and the pediatric patient experience.
由于婴儿的解剖学特征,婴儿外周血管穿刺是一项常见但技术上具有挑战性的操作。反复穿刺失败可能会增加患者和医护人员的并发症及心理压力。本系统评价旨在评估与传统或“盲目”技术相比,超声引导下婴儿外周血管置管的有效性和安全性。
按照PRISMA指南进行了系统评价。检索了PubMed数据库中2017年至2025年发表的研究。选择了比较两岁以下婴儿两种技术的研究,评估了穿刺次数、首次尝试成功率、医护人员认知、相关压力以及模拟在培训中的作用等变量。
纳入了11项研究,包括来自不同国家的临床试验、观察性研究和培训项目评估。大多数研究报告称,超声引导技术的首次尝试成功率更高(通常超过85%),穿刺次数和并发症更少,尤其是在经验不足的专业人员中。结构化培训后,医护人员的认知也有所改善。虽然一些研究报告了间接益处,但对患者和家庭所经历压力的直接评估较少。
超声引导下婴儿外周血管置管似乎比传统技术更有效、更安全,尤其是在复杂或重症监护环境中。其实施需要特定的培训和适当的资源,但可以显著改善临床结果和儿科患者体验。