• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

饮食质量调节来自两个具有不同社会人口统计学特征的不同队列的结肠定植个体的肠道微生物群结构。

Diet Quality Modulates Gut Microbiota Structure in -Colonised Individuals from Two Distinct Cohorts with Contrasting Sociodemographic Profiles.

作者信息

Muñoz-Yáñez Claudia, Méndez-Hernández Alejandra, González-Galarza Faviel Francisco, Prieto-Hinojosa Adria Imelda, Guangorena-Gómez Janeth Oliva

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Juárez University of the State of Durango, Gómez Palacio 35050, Mexico.

Institute of Genomic Science and Medicine, Torreón 27000, Mexico.

出版信息

Microorganisms. 2025 Aug 21;13(8):1949. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13081949.

DOI:10.3390/microorganisms13081949
PMID:40871453
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12388865/
Abstract

Diet and gut microbiota are significant determinants of host health, but how dietary quality modulates gut microbiota in -colonised individuals remains underexplored. We studied two contrasting cohorts: university students (FACSA, n = 46) and institutionalised children with their caregivers (PAVILA, n = 37), representing distinct dietary and sociodemographic contexts. Eight participants from each cohort tested positive for ; however, two PAVILA samples could not be sequenced, resulting in a final microbiota subcohort of 14 individuals (FACSA n = 8, PAVILA n = 6). Dietary quality was assessed using the Healthy Eating Index-2020 (HEI-2020), and faecal microbiota was characterised through 16S rRNA sequencing. Alpha and beta diversity were analysed, and genus-level transformed data were further evaluated using permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA), principal coordinates analysis (PCoA), and distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA). The FACSA cohort exhibited higher microbial richness and diversity (Shannon and Simpson indexes, < 0.01) compared to PAVILA, with marked differences in microbial composition (PERMANOVA R = 0.39, = 0.002). Total diet quality correlated with microbial structure (R = 0.26, = 0.016), with protein (R = 0.23, 0.017) and vegetable components (R = 0.17, = 0.044) as primary contributors. Multivariate analysis showed that higher protein and vegetable intakes were associated with genera such as , , , and (FACSA group). In contrast, , , and were linked to lower-quality diets (PAVILA group). Our results indicate that diet quality significantly influences gut microbiota composition in individuals colonised by , underscoring its potential as a target for nutritional interventions in vulnerable populations.

摘要

饮食和肠道微生物群是宿主健康的重要决定因素,但饮食质量如何调节已定植个体的肠道微生物群仍未得到充分研究。我们研究了两个形成对比的队列:大学生(FACSA,n = 46)和与照顾者一起生活的机构化儿童(PAVILA,n = 37),它们代表了不同的饮食和社会人口背景。每个队列中有8名参与者检测呈阳性;然而,两个PAVILA样本无法测序,最终形成了一个由14名个体组成的微生物群亚队列(FACSA组n = 8,PAVILA组n = 6)。使用2020年健康饮食指数(HEI - 2020)评估饮食质量,并通过16S rRNA测序对粪便微生物群进行表征。分析了α和β多样性,并使用置换多元方差分析(PERMANOVA)、主坐标分析(PCoA)和基于距离的冗余分析(db - RDA)对属水平的转换数据进行了进一步评估。与PAVILA队列相比,FACSA队列表现出更高的微生物丰富度和多样性(香农和辛普森指数,<0.01),微生物组成存在显著差异(PERMANOVA R = 0.39, = 0.002)。总体饮食质量与微生物结构相关(R = 0.26, = 0.016),蛋白质(R = 0.23, 0.017)和蔬菜成分(R = 0.17, = 0.044)是主要贡献因素。多变量分析表明,较高的蛋白质和蔬菜摄入量与诸如 、 、 和 等属相关(FACSA组)。相比之下, 、 和 与质量较低的饮食有关(PAVILA组)。我们的结果表明,饮食质量显著影响已被 定植个体的肠道微生物群组成,强调了其作为弱势群体营养干预靶点的潜力。

相似文献

1
Diet Quality Modulates Gut Microbiota Structure in -Colonised Individuals from Two Distinct Cohorts with Contrasting Sociodemographic Profiles.饮食质量调节来自两个具有不同社会人口统计学特征的不同队列的结肠定植个体的肠道微生物群结构。
Microorganisms. 2025 Aug 21;13(8):1949. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13081949.
2
Restoring Balance: Probiotic Modulation of Microbiota, Metabolism, and Inflammation in SSRI-Induced Dysbiosis Using the SHIME Model.恢复平衡:使用SHIME模型对SSRI诱导的菌群失调中微生物群、代谢和炎症进行益生菌调节
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jul 29;18(8):1132. doi: 10.3390/ph18081132.
3
Gut dysbiosis is associated with increased blood-brain barrier permeability and cognitive impairment in elderlies with coronary heart disease.肠道微生物群失调与冠心病老年人血脑屏障通透性增加和认知障碍有关。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Aug 13;17:1640761. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1640761. eCollection 2025.
4
Characterizing the seminal microbiota in mature rams managed on divergent planes of nutrition, and their male offspring.对处于不同营养水平管理下的成年公羊及其雄性后代的精液微生物群进行特征分析。
J Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 4;103. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf171.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing for microbiota analysis of rumen fluid, feces, and milk of Sarda sheep fed different content of alfalfa hay (Medicago sativa).对饲喂不同苜蓿干草(紫花苜蓿)含量的撒丁岛绵羊的瘤胃液、粪便和乳汁进行微生物群分析的16S rRNA基因扩增子测序。
J Dairy Sci. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-26172.
7
The risks, benefits, and resource implications of different diets in gastrostomy-fed children: The YourTube mixed method study.胃造口喂养儿童不同饮食的风险、益处及资源影响:YouTube混合方法研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(25):1-21. doi: 10.3310/RRREF7741.
8
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
9
The impact of dietary patterns on gut microbiota for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.饮食模式对心血管疾病一级和二级预防中肠道微生物群的影响:一项系统评价
Nutr J. 2025 Jan 28;24(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12937-024-01060-x.
10
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Blastocystis carriage and colonization intensity on gut microbiota composition in a non-westernized rural population from Colombia.哥伦比亚非西方化农村人口中芽囊原虫携带及定植强度对肠道微生物群组成的影响
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 May 12;19(5):e0013111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013111. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Gut Microbiota Modulation Through Mediterranean Diet Foods: Implications for Human Health.通过地中海饮食食物调节肠道微生物群:对人类健康的影响。
Nutrients. 2025 Mar 8;17(6):948. doi: 10.3390/nu17060948.
3
Fecal Microbiota and Metabolites Predict Metabolic Health Features across Various Dietary Patterns in Adults.
粪便微生物群和代谢物可预测成年人不同饮食模式下的代谢健康特征。
J Nutr. 2025 Jun;155(6):1795-1803. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.03.024. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
4
Gut microbiome signatures of vegan, vegetarian and omnivore diets and associated health outcomes across 21,561 individuals.21561名个体的纯素食、素食和杂食饮食的肠道微生物群特征及相关健康结果
Nat Microbiol. 2025 Jan;10(1):41-52. doi: 10.1038/s41564-024-01870-z. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
5
The microbiome-driven impact of western diet in the development of noncommunicable chronic disorders.西方饮食通过微生物群对非传染性慢性病发展的影响。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep;72:101923. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101923. Epub 2024 May 10.
6
Segatella clades adopt distinct roles within a single individual's gut.塞加塔利亚菌(clade)在个体肠道内扮演不同角色。
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024 Oct 27;10(1):114. doi: 10.1038/s41522-024-00590-w.
7
The Effect of Dietary Types on Gut Microbiota Composition and Development of Non-Communicable Diseases: A Narrative Review.膳食类型对肠道微生物组成和非传染性疾病发展的影响:叙述性综述。
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 17;16(18):3134. doi: 10.3390/nu16183134.
8
Intestinal Blastocystis is linked to healthier diets and more favorable cardiometabolic outcomes in 56,989 individuals from 32 countries.肠道内的芽囊原虫与来自 32 个国家的 56989 个人更健康的饮食和更有利的心脏代谢结果有关。
Cell. 2024 Aug 22;187(17):4554-4570.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.06.018. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
9
The Development and Evaluation of a Literature-Based Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota.基于文献的肠道微生物群膳食指数的开发和评估。
Nutrients. 2024 Apr 3;16(7):1045. doi: 10.3390/nu16071045.
10
Prevalence and genetic diversity of Blastocystis sp. among autochthonous and immigrant patients in Italy.意大利本土和移民患者中 Blastocystis sp. 的流行情况和遗传多样性。
Microb Pathog. 2023 Dec;185:106377. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106377. Epub 2023 Oct 13.