• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

细菌败血症引起的 Th1 途径的发病机制变化比病毒(COVID-19)败血症更为明显:一项全血转录组的前瞻性观察研究。

Bacterial sepsis causes more dramatic pathogenetic changes in the Th1 pathway than does viral (COVID-19) sepsis: a prospective observational study of whole blood transcriptomes.

机构信息

Department of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Virol J. 2024 Aug 19;21(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02451-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12985-024-02451-6
PMID:39160575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11334310/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to comprehensively compare host responses of patients with bacterial sepsis and those with viral (COVID-19) sepsis by analyzing messenger RNA (mRNA) and microRNA (miRNA) profiles to shed light on their distinct pathophysiological mechanisms.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Whole blood RNA sequencing was used to analyze mRNA and miRNA profiles of patients diagnosed as having bacterial sepsis or viral (COVID-19) sepsis at the Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.

PATIENTS

Twenty-two bacterial sepsis patients, 35 viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients, and 15 healthy subjects admitted to the department were included. We diagnosed bacterial sepsis patients according to the sepsis-3 criterion that the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score must increase to 2 points or more among patients with suspected infections. Viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients were diagnosed using SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, and presence of pneumonia was assessed through chest computed tomography scans.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

For RNA sequencing, 14,500 mRNAs, 1121 miRNAs, and 2556 miRNA-targeted mRNAs were available for analysis in the bacterial sepsis patients. Numbers of genes showing upregulated: downregulated gene expression (false discovery rate < 0.05, |log2 fold change| > 1.5) were 256:2887 for mRNA, 53:5 for miRNA, and 49:2507 for miRNA-targeted mRNA. Similarly, in viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients, 14,500 mRNAs, 1121 miRNAs, and 327 miRNA-targeted mRNAs were analyzed, with numbers of genes exhibiting upregulated: downregulated gene expression of 672:1147 for mRNA, 3:4 for miRNA, and 165:162 for miRNA-targeted mRNA. This analysis revealed significant differences in the numbers of upregulated and downregulated genes expressed and pathways between the bacterial sepsis and viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients. Bacterial sepsis patients showed activation of the PD-1 and PD-L1 cancer immunotherapy signaling pathway and concurrent suppression of Th1 signaling.

CONCLUSION

Our study illuminated distinct molecular variances between bacterial sepsis and viral (COVID-19) sepsis. Bacterial sepsis patients had a greater number of upregulated and downregulated genes and pathways compared to viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients. Especially, bacterial sepsis caused more dramatic pathogenetic changes in the Th1 pathway than did viral (COVID-19) sepsis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过分析信使 RNA(mRNA)和 microRNA(miRNA)谱,全面比较细菌性败血症和病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者的宿主反应,以阐明其不同的病理生理机制。

设计

前瞻性观察性研究。

地点

利用大阪大学医学院创伤急救医学系的全血 RNA 测序,分析诊断为细菌性败血症或病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者的 mRNA 和 miRNA 谱。

患者

22 例细菌性败血症患者、35 例病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者和 15 例健康受试者纳入研究。我们根据败血症-3 标准诊断细菌性败血症患者,即疑似感染患者的序贯器官衰竭评估评分必须增加 2 分或以上。病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者通过 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测诊断,通过胸部计算机断层扫描评估肺炎的存在。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

对于 RNA 测序,细菌性败血症患者有 14500 个 mRNAs、1121 个 miRNAs 和 2556 个 miRNA 靶向 mRNAs 可用于分析。mRNA 显示上调基因:下调基因表达(错误发现率<0.05,|log2 倍数变化|>1.5)的基因数量为 256:2887,miRNA 为 53:5,miRNA 靶向 mRNAs 为 49:2507。同样,在病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者中,分析了 14500 个 mRNAs、1121 个 miRNAs 和 327 个 miRNA 靶向 mRNAs,mRNA 显示上调基因:下调基因表达的基因数量为 672:1147,miRNA 为 3:4,miRNA 靶向 mRNAs 为 165:162。这项分析揭示了细菌性败血症和病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者之间表达和通路的上调和下调基因数量的显著差异。与病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者相比,细菌性败血症患者显示出 PD-1 和 PD-L1 癌症免疫治疗信号通路的激活,同时 Th1 信号通路受到抑制。

结论

本研究阐明了细菌性败血症和病毒性(COVID-19)败血症之间的显著分子差异。与病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者相比,细菌性败血症患者的上调和下调基因及通路数量更多。特别是,细菌性败血症引起的 Th1 通路病理变化比病毒性(COVID-19)败血症更明显。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/fea8b8368b93/12985_2024_2451_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/bfe5156c2992/12985_2024_2451_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/67e3e1508724/12985_2024_2451_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/292c3785c8b9/12985_2024_2451_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/220a6035f786/12985_2024_2451_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/b9f6f0430a01/12985_2024_2451_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/d6320cffb79f/12985_2024_2451_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/fea8b8368b93/12985_2024_2451_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/bfe5156c2992/12985_2024_2451_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/67e3e1508724/12985_2024_2451_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/292c3785c8b9/12985_2024_2451_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/220a6035f786/12985_2024_2451_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/b9f6f0430a01/12985_2024_2451_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/d6320cffb79f/12985_2024_2451_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f510/11334310/fea8b8368b93/12985_2024_2451_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Bacterial sepsis causes more dramatic pathogenetic changes in the Th1 pathway than does viral (COVID-19) sepsis: a prospective observational study of whole blood transcriptomes.细菌败血症引起的 Th1 途径的发病机制变化比病毒(COVID-19)败血症更为明显:一项全血转录组的前瞻性观察研究。
Virol J. 2024 Aug 19;21(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02451-6.
2
Whole-Transcriptome RNA Sequencing Reveals Significant Differentially Expressed mRNAs, miRNAs, and lncRNAs and Related Regulating Biological Pathways in the Peripheral Blood of COVID-19 Patients.全转录组 RNA 测序揭示了 COVID-19 患者外周血中显著差异表达的 mRNAs、miRNAs 和 lncRNAs 及相关调控的生物学通路。
Mediators Inflamm. 2021 Apr 1;2021:6635925. doi: 10.1155/2021/6635925. eCollection 2021.
3
T cell dysfunction in elderly ARDS patients based on miRNA and mRNA integration analysis.基于 miRNA 和 mRNA 整合分析的老年 ARDS 患者 T 细胞功能障碍。
Front Immunol. 2024 Mar 20;15:1368446. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1368446. eCollection 2024.
4
mRNA-miRNA integration analysis of T-cell exhaustion in sepsis from community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎所致脓毒症中T细胞耗竭的mRNA- miRNA整合分析
Acute Med Surg. 2025 Apr 2;12(1):e70054. doi: 10.1002/ams2.70054. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
MicroRNA and their target mRNAs change expression in whole blood of patients after intracerebral hemorrhage.脑出血后患者全血中的 microRNA 和其靶 mRNA 的表达发生改变。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020 Apr;40(4):775-786. doi: 10.1177/0271678X19839501. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
6
Exosomes from patients with septic shock convey miRNAs related to inflammation and cell cycle regulation: new signaling pathways in sepsis?脓毒性休克患者来源的外泌体传递与炎症和细胞周期调控相关的 miRNA:脓毒症中的新信号通路?
Crit Care. 2018 Mar 15;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2003-3.
7
A Novel 29-Messenger RNA Host-Response Assay From Whole Blood Accurately Identifies Bacterial and Viral Infections in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Suspected Infections: A Prospective Observational Study.一种新型的 29 信使 RNA 宿主反应检测方法,可从全血中准确识别因疑似感染而就诊于急诊科的患者中的细菌和病毒感染:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct 1;49(10):1664-1673. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005119.
8
Differential microRNA expression in the peripheral blood from human patients with COVID-19.COVID-19 患者外周血中的差异 microRNA 表达。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Oct;34(10):e23590. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23590. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
9
Genes Involved in miRNA Biogenesis Are Not Downregulated in SARS-CoV-2 Infection.在 SARS-CoV-2 感染中,参与 miRNA 生物发生的基因未下调。
Viruses. 2023 May 16;15(5):1177. doi: 10.3390/v15051177.
10
Messenger RNA and MicroRNA transcriptomic signatures of cardiometabolic risk factors.心脏代谢风险因素的信使核糖核酸和微小核糖核酸转录组特征
BMC Genomics. 2017 Feb 8;18(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3533-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinctive Temporal Profiles of Interferon-Stimulated Genes in Natural Infection, Viral Challenge, and Vaccination.自然感染、病毒攻击和疫苗接种中干扰素刺激基因的独特时间特征
Viruses. 2025 Jul 29;17(8):1060. doi: 10.3390/v17081060.
2
Immunothrombosis in Sepsis: Cellular Crosstalk, Molecular Triggers, and Therapeutic Opportunities-A Review.脓毒症中的免疫血栓形成:细胞间相互作用、分子触发因素及治疗机会——综述
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jun 25;26(13):6114. doi: 10.3390/ijms26136114.
3
mRNA-miRNA integration analysis of T-cell exhaustion in sepsis from community-acquired pneumonia.

本文引用的文献

1
Significance of interferon signaling based on mRNA-microRNA integration and plasma protein analyses in critically ill COVID-19 patients.基于mRNA-微RNA整合及血浆蛋白分析的干扰素信号在危重症COVID-19患者中的意义
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2022 Sep 13;29:343-353. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
2
New Insights into the Role of PD-1 and Its Ligands in Allergic Disease.PD-1 及其配体在过敏性疾病中的作用的新见解。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Nov 2;22(21):11898. doi: 10.3390/ijms222111898.
3
COVID-19 and the lungs: A review.
社区获得性肺炎所致脓毒症中T细胞耗竭的mRNA- miRNA整合分析
Acute Med Surg. 2025 Apr 2;12(1):e70054. doi: 10.1002/ams2.70054. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
新型冠状病毒肺炎与肺部:综述。
J Infect Public Health. 2021 Nov;14(11):1708-1714. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.09.024. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
4
Association of Annual Intensive Care Unit Sepsis Caseload With Hospital Mortality From Sepsis in the United Kingdom, 2010-2016.2010-2016 年英国重症监护病房每年脓毒症发病例数与医院脓毒症死亡率的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2115305. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15305.
5
Longitudinal transcriptome analyses show robust T cell immunity during recovery from COVID-19.纵向转录组分析显示,在新冠病毒感染康复过程中存在强大的T细胞免疫。
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020 Dec 24;5(1):294. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00457-4.
6
Lessons Learned Comparing Immune System Alterations of Bacterial Sepsis and SARS-CoV-2 Sepsis.比较细菌性败血症和 SARS-CoV-2 败血症的免疫系统改变的经验教训。
Front Immunol. 2020 Nov 30;11:598404. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.598404. eCollection 2020.
7
Comparison of clinical laboratory tests between bacterial sepsis and SARS-CoV-2-associated viral sepsis.细菌脓毒症与 SARS-CoV-2 相关病毒性脓毒症的临床实验室检查比较。
Mil Med Res. 2020 Aug 4;7(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40779-020-00267-3.
8
Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review.新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)的病理生理学、传播、诊断和治疗:综述。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):782-793. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12839.
9
PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: current researches in cancer.PD-1/PD-L1 通路:癌症领域的当前研究
Am J Cancer Res. 2020 Mar 1;10(3):727-742. eCollection 2020.
10
Covid-19 in Critically Ill Patients in the Seattle Region - Case Series.西雅图地区危重症新冠患者-病例系列。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2012-2022. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004500. Epub 2020 Mar 30.