Department of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka, Japan.
Virol J. 2024 Aug 19;21(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02451-6.
This study aimed to comprehensively compare host responses of patients with bacterial sepsis and those with viral (COVID-19) sepsis by analyzing messenger RNA (mRNA) and microRNA (miRNA) profiles to shed light on their distinct pathophysiological mechanisms.
Prospective observational study.
Whole blood RNA sequencing was used to analyze mRNA and miRNA profiles of patients diagnosed as having bacterial sepsis or viral (COVID-19) sepsis at the Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.
Twenty-two bacterial sepsis patients, 35 viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients, and 15 healthy subjects admitted to the department were included. We diagnosed bacterial sepsis patients according to the sepsis-3 criterion that the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score must increase to 2 points or more among patients with suspected infections. Viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients were diagnosed using SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, and presence of pneumonia was assessed through chest computed tomography scans.
None.
For RNA sequencing, 14,500 mRNAs, 1121 miRNAs, and 2556 miRNA-targeted mRNAs were available for analysis in the bacterial sepsis patients. Numbers of genes showing upregulated: downregulated gene expression (false discovery rate < 0.05, |log2 fold change| > 1.5) were 256:2887 for mRNA, 53:5 for miRNA, and 49:2507 for miRNA-targeted mRNA. Similarly, in viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients, 14,500 mRNAs, 1121 miRNAs, and 327 miRNA-targeted mRNAs were analyzed, with numbers of genes exhibiting upregulated: downregulated gene expression of 672:1147 for mRNA, 3:4 for miRNA, and 165:162 for miRNA-targeted mRNA. This analysis revealed significant differences in the numbers of upregulated and downregulated genes expressed and pathways between the bacterial sepsis and viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients. Bacterial sepsis patients showed activation of the PD-1 and PD-L1 cancer immunotherapy signaling pathway and concurrent suppression of Th1 signaling.
Our study illuminated distinct molecular variances between bacterial sepsis and viral (COVID-19) sepsis. Bacterial sepsis patients had a greater number of upregulated and downregulated genes and pathways compared to viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients. Especially, bacterial sepsis caused more dramatic pathogenetic changes in the Th1 pathway than did viral (COVID-19) sepsis.
本研究旨在通过分析信使 RNA(mRNA)和 microRNA(miRNA)谱,全面比较细菌性败血症和病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者的宿主反应,以阐明其不同的病理生理机制。
前瞻性观察性研究。
利用大阪大学医学院创伤急救医学系的全血 RNA 测序,分析诊断为细菌性败血症或病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者的 mRNA 和 miRNA 谱。
22 例细菌性败血症患者、35 例病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者和 15 例健康受试者纳入研究。我们根据败血症-3 标准诊断细菌性败血症患者,即疑似感染患者的序贯器官衰竭评估评分必须增加 2 分或以上。病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者通过 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测诊断,通过胸部计算机断层扫描评估肺炎的存在。
无。
对于 RNA 测序,细菌性败血症患者有 14500 个 mRNAs、1121 个 miRNAs 和 2556 个 miRNA 靶向 mRNAs 可用于分析。mRNA 显示上调基因:下调基因表达(错误发现率<0.05,|log2 倍数变化|>1.5)的基因数量为 256:2887,miRNA 为 53:5,miRNA 靶向 mRNAs 为 49:2507。同样,在病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者中,分析了 14500 个 mRNAs、1121 个 miRNAs 和 327 个 miRNA 靶向 mRNAs,mRNA 显示上调基因:下调基因表达的基因数量为 672:1147,miRNA 为 3:4,miRNA 靶向 mRNAs 为 165:162。这项分析揭示了细菌性败血症和病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者之间表达和通路的上调和下调基因数量的显著差异。与病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者相比,细菌性败血症患者显示出 PD-1 和 PD-L1 癌症免疫治疗信号通路的激活,同时 Th1 信号通路受到抑制。
本研究阐明了细菌性败血症和病毒性(COVID-19)败血症之间的显著分子差异。与病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者相比,细菌性败血症患者的上调和下调基因及通路数量更多。特别是,细菌性败血症引起的 Th1 通路病理变化比病毒性(COVID-19)败血症更明显。