BACKGROUND: Understanding the duration and quality of immune memory following SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination is critical for informing public health strategies and vaccine development. While waning antibody levels have raised concerns about long-term protection, the persistence of memory B cells (MBCs) and T cells plays a vital role in sustaining immunity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal prospective study over 12 months, enrolling 285 participants in total, either after natural infection or vaccination with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. Peripheral blood samples were collected at four defined time points (baseline, 1-2 months, 6-7 months, and 12-13 months after vaccination or disease onset). Immune responses were assessed through serological assays quantifying anti-RBD IgG and neutralizing antibodies, B-ELISPOT, and multiparameter flow cytometry for S1-specific memory B cells. RESULTS: Both mRNA vaccines induced robust B cell and antibody responses, exceeding those observed after natural infection. Memory B cell frequencies peaked at 6 months and declined by 12 months, but remained above the baseline. The mRNA-1273 vaccine elicited stronger and more durable humoral and memory B-cell-mediated immunity compared to BNT162b2, likely influenced by its higher mRNA dose and longer prime-boost interval. Class-switched memory B cells and S1-specific B cells were significantly expanded in vaccine recipients. Natural infection induced more heterogeneous immune memory. CONCLUSIONS: Both mRNA vaccination and natural SARS-CoV-2 infection induce a comparable expansion of memory B cell subsets, reflecting a consistent pattern of humoral immune responses across all studied groups. These findings highlight the importance of vaccination in generating sustained immunological memory and suggest that the vaccine platform and dosage influence the magnitude and durability of immune responses against SARS-CoV-2.