• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部空想性错视中的性别差异:认知风格和判断标准的影响。

Gender differences in face pareidolia: The effect of cognitive style and judgment criteria.

作者信息

Wang Hao, Yang Zhigang

机构信息

College of Education, Hebei University, China.

Handan Preschool Teachers College, China.

出版信息

Iperception. 2025 Aug 25;16(4):20416695251364206. doi: 10.1177/20416695251364206. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.

DOI:10.1177/20416695251364206
PMID:40873864
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12378617/
Abstract

Face pareidolia refers to perceiving facial features on inanimate objects. Previous studies have identified gender differences in pareidolia, but the factors behind these differences remain unclear. This study examined potential influences, including task requirement, low-frequency information encoding ability, and cognitive style. University student participants reported what they saw in face-like object images and rated their face-likeness. A delayed matching task with blurred faces assessed encoding ability, and the Navon task examined cognitive style. Results showed that gender differences were influenced by task demands: women were more likely than men to perceive faces in objects, and this was not related to facial configuration processing. Additionally, a global processing tendency predicted higher pareidolia in women but not in men. Our findings suggest that gender differences in pareidolia are shaped by judgment criteria, with women adopting more relaxed criteria. This research contributes to understanding gender differences in social cognition.

摘要

面部空想性错视是指在无生命物体上感知到面部特征。以往的研究已经确定了空想性错视中的性别差异,但这些差异背后的因素仍不清楚。本研究考察了潜在影响因素,包括任务要求、低频信息编码能力和认知风格。大学生参与者报告了他们在类脸物体图像中看到的内容,并对其面部相似度进行了评分。一项带有模糊面孔的延迟匹配任务评估了编码能力,而纳冯任务则考察了认知风格。结果表明,性别差异受任务需求的影响:女性比男性更有可能在物体中感知到面孔,且这与面部构型加工无关。此外,整体加工倾向预示着女性有更高的空想性错视,但男性并非如此。我们的研究结果表明,空想性错视中的性别差异是由判断标准塑造的,女性采用的标准更为宽松。这项研究有助于理解社会认知中的性别差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b50f/12378617/5030f1debf60/10.1177_20416695251364206-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b50f/12378617/1e96a4684d9a/10.1177_20416695251364206-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b50f/12378617/c40b03dd5a19/10.1177_20416695251364206-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b50f/12378617/ad8787b96a5c/10.1177_20416695251364206-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b50f/12378617/fd8f06318752/10.1177_20416695251364206-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b50f/12378617/5030f1debf60/10.1177_20416695251364206-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b50f/12378617/1e96a4684d9a/10.1177_20416695251364206-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b50f/12378617/c40b03dd5a19/10.1177_20416695251364206-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b50f/12378617/ad8787b96a5c/10.1177_20416695251364206-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b50f/12378617/fd8f06318752/10.1177_20416695251364206-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b50f/12378617/5030f1debf60/10.1177_20416695251364206-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender differences in face pareidolia: The effect of cognitive style and judgment criteria.面部空想性错视中的性别差异:认知风格和判断标准的影响。
Iperception. 2025 Aug 25;16(4):20416695251364206. doi: 10.1177/20416695251364206. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Facial emotion recognition accuracy in women with symptoms of polycystic ovary syndrome: Reduced fear and disgust perception.患有多囊卵巢综合征症状女性的面部情绪识别准确性:恐惧和厌恶感知能力降低。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251359761. doi: 10.1177/17455057251359761. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
4
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
5
"I Don't Understand Their Sense of Belonging": Exploring How Nonbinary Autistic Adults Experience Gender.“我不理解他们的归属感”:探索非二元性别的自闭症成年人如何体验性别。
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):462-473. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0071. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
7
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”:对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
One object with two identities: The rapid detection of face pareidolia in face and food detection tasks.具有两种身份的一个对象:在面部和食物检测任务中对面部空想性错视的快速检测。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2025 Jun;51(6):710-720. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001296. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
9
The neural basis of face pareidolia with human intracerebral recordings.通过人类脑内记录研究面部空想性错视的神经基础。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Mar 31;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00518. eCollection 2025.
10
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.

本文引用的文献

1
Illusory faces are more likely to be perceived as male than female.错觉面孔更有可能被视为男性,而不是女性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 1;119(5). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117413119.
2
A shared mechanism for facial expression in human faces and face pareidolia.人类面孔和面孔错觉中的面部表情共享机制。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 14;288(1954):20210966. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0966. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
3
A visual search advantage for illusory faces in objects.物体中的错觉面孔具有视觉搜索优势。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jul;83(5):1942-1953. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02267-4. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
4
Face pareidolia in the brain: Impact of gender and orientation.大脑中的面孔错觉:性别和性取向的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244516. eCollection 2020.
5
Rapid and dynamic processing of face pareidolia in the human brain.人类大脑对面部错觉的快速和动态处理。
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 9;11(1):4518. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18325-8.
6
What Is a Face? Critical Features for Face Detection.什么是脸?面部检测的关键特征。
Perception. 2019 May;48(5):437-446. doi: 10.1177/0301006619838734. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
7
Even subtle cultural differences affect face tuning.即使是细微的文化差异也会影响面部调整。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 11;13(6):e0198299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198299. eCollection 2018.
8
Global-local processing relates to spatial and verbal processing: implications for sex differences in cognition.整体-局部加工与空间和言语加工有关:对认知性别差异的启示。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 5;7(1):10575. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11013-6.
9
Mental imagery of face enhances face-sensitive event-related potentials to ambiguous visual stimuli.面部的心理意象增强了对模糊视觉刺激的面部敏感事件相关电位。
Biol Psychol. 2017 Oct;129:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
10
Social cognition in autism: Face tuning.自闭症的社会认知:面孔调谐。
Sci Rep. 2017 May 26;7(1):2734. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02790-1.