Karachi F, Maritz J J, Esterhuizen T M, Gosselink R, Hanekom S D
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
South Afr J Crit Care. 2025 May 19;41(1):e2695. doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2695.v41i1.2695. eCollection 2025.
Evidence for implementation of evidence-based protocols (EBPs) in resource-constrained intensive care units (ICUs) is sparse.
To evaluate a tailored best-practice multifaceted strategy for implementation of a validated physiotherapy EBP for the management of surgical ICU (SICU) patients. Also, to explore the physiotherapists' perceptions regarding the implementation process and factors affecting protocol adherence, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
A type 2 hybrid implementation study design was applied, including all adult patients admitted over 16 months to two (control and experimental) SICUs in Western Cape Province, South Africa. The physiotherapists eligible to participate in the qualitative study (N=17) were those who participated in the implementation process and worked in the experimental SICU. The Therapeutic Index Scoring System-28 (TISS-28) and four process of care indicators (POCIs) were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively, both analysed in Stata version 15. Thematic content analysis of textual data generated physiotherapists' perceptions of the implementation process.
The intervention strategy did not result in protocol adherence, with no significant difference (p>0.05) in TISS-28 and POCI outcomes during and after implementation in the experimental unit and all phases of the control. Physiotherapists (71%; n=12/17) perceived that the process affected their thinking and clinical decision-making, but not the organisation of physiotherapy services, except for a more multidisciplinary approach to care in the experimental unit. Organisational factors (time constraints, workload/flow barriers) affected adherence, explaining the lack of practice change.
The importance of organisational change and support of the physiotherapy departments providing services to ICUs while also addressing the healthcare needs of a diverse group of hospitalised patients is highlighted.
The study provides insights for rehabilitation implementation in resource-constrained intensive care settings. It highlights the importance of taking the next step towards implementation in complex environments and a new approach to facilitating the uptake of evidence and ensuring sustainable change through addressing the structural and organisational aspects of physiotherapy service delivery and care, and the inclusion of a multidisciplinary team approach to the implementation of any discipline-specific evidence-based protocols in the intensive care setting.
在资源有限的重症监护病房(ICU)实施循证方案(EBP)的证据很少。
评估一种针对外科ICU(SICU)患者管理的经过验证的物理治疗EBP实施的量身定制的最佳实践多方面策略。此外,以实施研究综合框架为指导,探讨物理治疗师对实施过程以及影响方案依从性的因素的看法。
采用2型混合实施研究设计,纳入了在16个月内入住南非西开普省两家(对照和实验)SICU的所有成年患者。有资格参与定性研究的物理治疗师(N = 17)是那些参与实施过程并在实验SICU工作的人员。治疗指数评分系统-28(TISS-28)和四个护理过程指标(POCI)分别是主要和次要结局,均在Stata 15版本中进行分析。对文本数据进行主题内容分析,得出物理治疗师对实施过程的看法。
干预策略未导致方案依从性,在实验组实施期间和之后以及对照组的所有阶段,TISS-28和POCI结局均无显著差异(p>0.05)。物理治疗师(71%;n = 12/17)认为该过程影响了他们的思维和临床决策,但对物理治疗服务的组织没有影响,除了实验组采用了更多的多学科护理方法。组织因素(时间限制、工作量/流程障碍)影响了依从性,这解释了实践没有改变的原因。
强调了组织变革以及为ICU提供服务的物理治疗部门提供支持的重要性,同时也要满足不同住院患者群体的医疗需求。
该研究为资源有限的重症监护环境中的康复实施提供了见解。它强调了在复杂环境中朝着实施迈出下一步的重要性,以及一种新方法,即通过解决物理治疗服务提供和护理的结构及组织方面问题,并纳入多学科团队方法来促进证据的采用并确保可持续变革,以在重症监护环境中实施任何特定学科的循证方案。