• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向非正式护理和职业自我效能的转变:一项使用德国代表性员工数据的双重差分倾向得分匹配分析。

Transitioning into informal care and occupational self-efficacy : A difference-in-differences propensity score matching analysis using representative German employee data.

作者信息

Kunz Carolin

机构信息

Sozialstruktur und Soziologie alternder Gesellschaften, Fakultät Sozialwissenschaften, Technische Universität Dortmund, Emil-Figge-Straße 50, 44227, Dortmund, Germany.

出版信息

Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s00391-025-02481-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00391-025-02481-x
PMID:40875005
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to demographic ageing, the number of care receivers has been rising, while the number of caregivers is decreasing in many countries. Informal caregiving often begins while still in active employment often leading to role conflicts. The dual burden can negatively affect job performance and lead to changes in occupational self-efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

Despite being of high relevance for individuals, organizations and society, there is a research gap concerning occupational self-efficacy, which may serve as a mechanism for reduced working hours or exit from the labor market after taking on care responsibilities. Thus, this article analyzes the impact of transitioning into informal caregiving on occupational self-efficacy longitudinally.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study included the 2017, 2019 and 2021 waves of the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA) Working Time Survey, which is a representative panel study of employees in Germany. For each respondent, two waves were used (n ≥ 3052). Difference-in-differences (DiD) models with the transition into informal care with distinctions of different care frequencies as the treatment variables were calculated. To control for selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied.

RESULTS

Based on the DID models, transitioning into at least occasionally caregiving had a negative effect on occupational self-efficacy, leading to a significant deterioration in composure in the face of occupational difficulties, ideas for solving problems at work and the ability to cope with most occupational demands. The results based on PSM supported these findings.

CONCLUSION

With respect to, e.g., skilled labor shortages and challenges for welfare systems, sustaining employees' working ability including occupational self-efficacy is of utmost relevance in ageing societies.

摘要

背景

由于人口老龄化,许多国家的受照顾者数量不断增加,而照顾者数量却在减少。非正式照顾往往在照顾者仍在职时就开始了,这常常导致角色冲突。双重负担会对工作表现产生负面影响,并导致职业自我效能感的变化。

目的

尽管职业自我效能感对个人、组织和社会都具有高度相关性,但在这方面仍存在研究空白,职业自我效能感可能是承担照顾责任后减少工作时间或退出劳动力市场的一种机制。因此,本文纵向分析了向非正式照顾角色转变对职业自我效能感的影响。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了德国联邦职业安全与健康研究所(BAuA)2017年、2019年和2021年的工作时间调查数据,这是一项针对德国员工的代表性面板研究。对每位受访者使用了两期数据(n≥3052)。计算了以不同照顾频率区分的向非正式照顾角色转变作为处理变量的双重差分(DiD)模型。为控制选择偏差,应用了倾向得分匹配(PSM)方法。

结果

基于双重差分模型,至少偶尔转变为照顾者角色对职业自我效能感有负面影响,导致面对工作困难时的镇定程度、解决工作问题的思路以及应对大多数工作要求的能力显著下降。基于倾向得分匹配的结果支持了这些发现。

结论

例如,鉴于熟练劳动力短缺和福利系统面临的挑战,在老龄化社会中维持员工的工作能力,包括职业自我效能感,至关重要。

相似文献

1
Transitioning into informal care and occupational self-efficacy : A difference-in-differences propensity score matching analysis using representative German employee data.向非正式护理和职业自我效能的转变:一项使用德国代表性员工数据的双重差分倾向得分匹配分析。
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s00391-025-02481-x.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
4
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Transition of care for adolescents from paediatric services to adult health services.青少年医疗护理从儿科服务向成人健康服务的过渡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 29;4(4):CD009794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009794.pub2.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement invariance in the social sciences: Historical development, methodological challenges, state of the art, and future perspectives.社会科学中的测量不变性:历史发展、方法学挑战、现状和未来展望。
Soc Sci Res. 2023 Feb;110:102805. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102805. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
2
Social inequalities in early exit from employment in Germany: a causal mediation analysis on the role of work, health, and work ability.德国就业早期退出的社会不平等:基于工作、健康和工作能力的因果中介分析
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):569-578. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4043. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
3
A Canadian national survey of informal employed caregivers of older adults with and without dementia: Work and employee outcomes.
一项针对有和没有痴呆症的老年成年人的非正式就业护理者的加拿大全国性调查:工作和员工结果。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;68(1):183-195. doi: 10.1177/0020764020983866. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
4
Work Performance Among Informal Caregivers: A Review of the Literature.非正式护工的工作表现:文献综述。
J Aging Health. 2020 Oct;32(9):1017-1028. doi: 10.1177/0898264319895374. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
5
From Work Ability Research to Implementation.从工作能力研究到实施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 12;16(16):2882. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162882.
6
Matching and Regression to the Mean in Difference-in-Differences Analysis.双重差分分析中的匹配与均值回归
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4138-4156. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12993. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
7
Will you still need me, will you still feed me when I'm 64? The health impact of caregiving to one's spouse.当我64岁时,你是否还需要我,是否还会照顾我?照顾配偶对健康的影响。
Health Econ. 2017 Sep;26 Suppl 2(Suppl Suppl 2):127-138. doi: 10.1002/hec.3542.
8
Feeling the squeeze? The effects of combining work and informal caregiving on psychological well-being.感到压力重重?工作与非正式护理相结合对心理健康的影响。
Eur J Ageing. 2014 May 3;12(1):51-60. doi: 10.1007/s10433-014-0315-y. eCollection 2015 Mar.
9
Work Impact and Emotional Stress Among Informal Caregivers for Older Adults.老年人非正式照料者的工作影响与情绪压力
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 May 1;72(3):522-531. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw027.
10
Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis.照料者与非照料者在心理健康和身体健康方面的差异:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Aging. 2003 Jun;18(2):250-67. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.250.