Abdel Jawad Mohammad, Spertus John A, Cho Yoon J, Jones Philip G, Arnold Suzanne V
University of Missouri Kansas City's Healthcare Institute for Innovations in Quality, Kansas City.
Division of Cardiology, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2529519. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29519.
β-Blockers are widely used for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, their association with health status among this population remains unknown.
To evaluate the association of β-blocker use with health status among patients with HFpEF.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study was a secondary analysis of the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist randomized clinical trial, which enrolled 3445 patients with HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≥45%) to receive spironolactone or placebo. We excluded 1678 patients from Georgia or Russia and 41 with missing baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (KCCQ-OS) or β-blocker data, resulting in an analytic cohort of 1726 patients enrolled between August 10, 2006, and January 31, 2012. Statistical analysis was performed from July to November 2024.
β-Blocker use.
Heath status was assessed with the KCCQ-OS, a heart failure-specific health status patient-reported outcome measure. The cross-sectional association of β-blocker use and baseline KCCQ-OS was assessed using multivariable linear regression, adjusted for demographic and clinical factors, and testing the interaction of β-blocker × LVEF. A second model examined changes in KCCQ-OS from baseline to 4 months and tested the interaction between β-blocker use and spironolactone to examine whether β-blockers were associated with modification of the health status benefit of spironolactone.
Among 1726 patients with HFpEF (mean [SD] age, 71.6 [9.7] years; 862 women [49.9%]; mean [SD] LVEF, 58.1% [7.7%]), 1356 (78.6%) were receiving β-blockers at baseline. β-Blocker use was not significantly associated with concurrent KCCQ-OS (mean difference, -1.1 points [95% CI, -3.7 to 1.4 points]; P = .38). This association did not significantly differ by LVEF, although patients with LVEF of 65% or more who used β-blockers had a numerically lower KCCQ-OS score (mean difference, -6.1 points [95% CI, -12.3 to 0.0 points]) compared with LVEF of 55% to 64% (mean difference, 0.0 points [95% CI, -3.9 to 3.8 points) and LVEF of 45% to 54% (mean difference, -0.2 points [95% CI, -4.3 to 3.8 points]) (P = .21 for interaction). In the longitudinal model, β-blockers were not associated with modification of the health status benefits of spironolactone at 4 months (mean difference, 2.9 points [95% CI, -1.0 to 4.9 points] with β-blockers vs 0.1 [95% CI, -3.7 to 3.9 points] without; P = .20 for interaction).
In this cohort study of patients with HFpEF, β-blocker use was not associated with better or worse baseline health status or the modification of the health status benefits of spironolactone at 4 months. Further research is needed to better understand the association of β-blockers with health status among patients with HFpEF.
β受体阻滞剂广泛用于射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者。然而,在这一人群中,它们与健康状况之间的关联尚不清楚。
评估HFpEF患者使用β受体阻滞剂与健康状况之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究是对一项使用醛固酮拮抗剂治疗保留心功能心力衰竭的随机临床试验的二次分析,该试验纳入了3445例HFpEF患者(左心室射血分数[LVEF]≥45%),以接受螺内酯或安慰剂治疗。我们排除了来自佐治亚州或俄罗斯的1678例患者以及41例基线堪萨斯城心肌病问卷总体汇总评分(KCCQ-OS)或β受体阻滞剂数据缺失的患者,最终形成了一个由1726例患者组成的分析队列,这些患者于2006年8月10日至2012年1月31日入组。统计分析于2024年7月至11月进行。
使用β受体阻滞剂。
使用KCCQ-OS评估健康状况,这是一种心力衰竭特异性的健康状况患者报告结局测量指标。使用多变量线性回归评估β受体阻滞剂使用与基线KCCQ-OS之间的横断面关联,并对人口统计学和临床因素进行调整,同时检验β受体阻滞剂×LVEF的相互作用。第二个模型检查了从基线到4个月KCCQ-OS的变化,并检验了β受体阻滞剂使用与螺内酯之间的相互作用,以研究β受体阻滞剂是否与螺内酯对健康状况的益处的改变有关。
在1726例HFpEF患者中(平均[标准差]年龄为71.6[9.7]岁;862例女性[49.9%];平均[标准差]LVEF为58.1%[7.7%]),1356例(78.6%)在基线时接受β受体阻滞剂治疗。使用β受体阻滞剂与同期KCCQ-OS无显著关联(平均差异为-1.1分[95%置信区间为-3.7至1.4分];P = 0.38)。尽管LVEF为65%或更高且使用β受体阻滞剂的患者的KCCQ-OS评分在数值上低于LVEF为55%至64%的患者(平均差异为-6.1分[95%置信区间为-12.3至0.0分])和LVEF为45%至54%的患者(平均差异为-0.2分[95%置信区间为-4.3至3.8分]),但这种关联在不同LVEF水平之间没有显著差异(相互作用的P值为0.21)。在纵向模型中,β受体阻滞剂与4个月时螺内酯对健康状况的益处的改变无关(使用β受体阻滞剂时平均差异为2.9分[95%置信区间为-1.0至4.9分],未使用时为0.1分[95%置信区间为-3.7至3.9分];相互作用的P值为0.20)。
在这项针对HFpEF患者的队列研究中,使用β受体阻滞剂与更好或更差的基线健康状况无关,也与4个月时螺内酯对健康状况的益处的改变无关。需要进一步研究以更好地理解β受体阻滞剂与HFpEF患者健康状况之间的关联。