Bottesini Victor C, Silva Douglas F D A, Prado Tatiana P, Torres Carlos R G, Borges Alessandra B, Mailart Mariane C
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University- UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University- UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil,
Am J Dent. 2025 Aug;38(4):201-207.
To evaluate the efficacy of low and high-concentrated bleaching gels in both at-home and in-office techniques and their effects on enamel properties.
Bovine enamel/dentin specimens were randomly allocated to five groups (n=12): deionized water (negative control - DW), 6% hydrogen peroxide (6HP), 40% hydrogen peroxide (40HP), 10% carbamide peroxide (10CP), and 45% carbamide peroxide (45CP). For 6HP and 40HP, the gel was applied 3x20 minutes in 1 day. For 10CP and 45CP, the bleaching gels were applied 1x/day for 8 hours and 1x/day for 30 minutes over 7 days, respectively. Before and after bleaching treatment, color (CIE Lab*), surface microhardness (SMH), roughness (Ra), and gloss (GU) were assessed. Alterations in color (ΔE₀₀ and ΔWID), SMH (%SMHalt), Ra (%Raalt) and GU (%GUalt) were calculated. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α= 0.05).
Significant differences were found for color alteration (P< 0.05). The group 10CP showed the highest color difference. The groups 40HP, 10CP, and 45CP exhibited similar values of ΔWID. No alteration in enamel microhardness and roughness was found (P> 0.05). Although significant differences were found for %GUalt between the groups (P< 0.05), they were not different from the negative control. The 10% carbamide peroxide resulted in the highest color alteration, while all tested bleaching gels were effective in producing color change that exceeded the acceptability threshold without causing damage to the enamel surface.
All bleaching gels can be considered safe in the tested protocol, and the greatest color difference was promoted by 10% carbamide peroxide overnight.
评估低浓度和高浓度漂白凝胶在家用和诊室技术中的疗效及其对牙釉质性能的影响。
将牛牙釉质/牙本质标本随机分为五组(n = 12):去离子水(阴性对照 - DW)、6%过氧化氢(6HP)、40%过氧化氢(40HP)、10%过氧化脲(10CP)和45%过氧化脲(45CP)。对于6HP和40HP,凝胶在一天内分3次涂抹,每次20分钟。对于10CP和45CP,漂白凝胶分别在7天内每天涂抹1次,每次8小时和每天涂抹1次,每次30分钟。在漂白处理前后,评估颜色(CIE Lab*)、表面显微硬度(SMH)、粗糙度(Ra)和光泽度(GU)。计算颜色变化(ΔE₀₀和ΔWID)、SMH(%SMHalt)、Ra(%Raalt)和GU(%GUalt)的变化。数据采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 0.05)进行分析。
发现颜色变化存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。10CP组显示出最大的颜色差异。40HP、10CP和45CP组的ΔWID值相似。未发现牙釉质显微硬度和粗糙度有变化(P > 0.05)。尽管各组之间的%GUalt存在显著差异(P < 0.05),但与阴性对照无差异。10%过氧化脲导致最大的颜色变化,而所有测试的漂白凝胶在产生超过可接受阈值的颜色变化方面都是有效的,且不会对牙釉质表面造成损害。
在测试方案中,所有漂白凝胶都可被认为是安全的,10%过氧化脲在夜间促进了最大的颜色差异。