Alfirevich Sheridan, Keshavarzi Hamideh, Sandilands Victoria, Small Alison
Inghams Enterprises P/L, Lytton, Queensland 4178, Australia; Scotland's Rural University College (SRUC), Roslin Institute Building, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian EH25 9RG, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Agriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Poult Sci. 2025 Aug 20;104(11):105707. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105707.
Painful husbandry treatments, e.g. infrared beak treatment (IRBT), de-snooding (DS), and hot blade toenail trimming (TT), are routinely performed on day-old commercial turkey poults without analgesia. This study assessed the behavioral response following treatments with or without meloxicam. 150 day-old male Nicholas Select turkey poults were randomly assigned to five treatment groups: a low-pain control (IRBT, diluent); a high-pain control (IRBT, TT, DS, diluent); 2.5 (IRBT, TT, DS, 2.5 mg/kg meloxicam); 5 (IRBT, TT, DS, 5 mg/kg meloxicam); and 10 (IRBT, TT, DS, 10 mg/kg meloxicam) mg/kg meloxicam. As the study was designed to mimic a commercial setting, in which poults receive vaccinations via the Nova-Tech IRBT machine, there was no non-IRBT control. Poults were monitored by video for 24 hours post treatment, and behavior annotation carried out offline at half-hourly intervals. There were three distinct phases to the poults' behavior. The period of highest activity and most variation between treatment groups occurred during the initial 6-hour observation period, after which activity reduced across all treatment groups and was at a low level from hour 13 onwards. Post-hoc analysis was carried out within Phase 1 (0-5 hours) and Phase 2 (8-11 hours). As there was no non-IRTB-treated control, it is unclear if the phased change in behavior was related to the treatments or reflects normal poult behavior post-hatching. There was not a clear meloxicam dose-response when all treatments were included in the analysis. However, within-phase analysis for Phase 1 shows poults in the high-pain control group were less active than some meloxicam-treated groups at certain time blocks Whilst the findings indicate a likely analgesic effect of meloxicam, pharmacokinetic data and more frequent behavioral observations, particularly in the first 6 hours, are required to further evaluate the impact on acute pain response.
痛苦的饲养管理措施,如红外线喙部处理(IRBT)、去除肉垂(DS)和热刀片修剪趾甲(TT),在一日龄的商用火鸡雏禽身上常规进行,且不进行镇痛处理。本研究评估了使用或不使用美洛昔康进行处理后的行为反应。150只一日龄雄性尼古拉斯精选火鸡雏禽被随机分配到五个处理组:低疼痛对照组(IRBT,稀释剂);高疼痛对照组(IRBT、TT、DS,稀释剂);2.5毫克/千克美洛昔康组(IRBT、TT、DS,2.5毫克/千克美洛昔康);5毫克/千克美洛昔康组(IRBT、TT、DS,5毫克/千克美洛昔康);以及10毫克/千克美洛昔康组(IRBT、TT、DS,10毫克/千克美洛昔康)。由于该研究旨在模拟商业环境,即雏禽通过诺瓦科技IRBT机器接种疫苗,因此没有非IRBT对照组。处理后通过视频对雏禽进行24小时监测,并每隔半小时进行一次离线行为注释。雏禽的行为有三个不同阶段。活动最频繁且各处理组之间差异最大的时期出现在最初的6小时观察期内,之后所有处理组的活动都减少,从第13小时起处于低水平。在第1阶段(0 - 5小时)和第2阶段(8 - 11小时)进行了事后分析。由于没有未进行IRBT处理的对照组,尚不清楚行为的阶段性变化是与处理有关还是反映了雏禽出壳后的正常行为。当所有处理都纳入分析时,没有明显的美洛昔康剂量反应。然而,第1阶段的阶段内分析表明,在某些时间段,高疼痛对照组的雏禽比一些美洛昔康处理组的雏禽活动更少。虽然研究结果表明美洛昔康可能有镇痛作用,但需要药代动力学数据和更频繁的行为观察,特别是在最初的6小时内,以进一步评估对急性疼痛反应的影响。