• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Hypofractionated vs. single-session Gamma Knife radiosurgery for orbital cavernous hemangiomas: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and institutional case series.

作者信息

Goulenko Victor, Sinha Sarthak, Madhugiri Venkatesh Shankar, Almeida Neil D, Plunkett Robert J, Snyder Kenneth V, Prasad Dheerendra

机构信息

Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA; Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Aug 27;141:111587. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111587.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111587
PMID:40876423
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Orbital cavernous hemangiomas (OCH) are rare benign vascular tumors that pose therapeutic challenges due to their proximity to critical visual structures. While surgical resection remains the standard of care, Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. However, the optimal fractionation strategy, single-session versus hypofractionated treatment, remains unclear. This review aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of single-session versus hypofractionated GKRS for OCH through a systematic review, meta-analysis, and a complementary institutional case series.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (registration code:1061256). Databases were searched from inception through April 2025. Eligible studies reported outcomes of GKRS for OCH using either single-session or hypofractionated treatment. Meta-analyses were performed to compare (1) the proportion of patients with tumor volume reduction, (2) the mean percentage reduction in tumor volume, and (3) the proportion of patients with improvement in visual symptoms. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to assess publication bias. Additionally, three institutional cases treated with GKRS were included to supplement the clinical context.

RESULTS

Eleven studies comprising 117 patients were included, with an additional 3 patients from our institution. Tumor volume reduction was observed in 100 % of patients in the fractionated group and 89 % in the single-session group (p = 0.0853). The pooled mean percentage volume reduction was -2.65 % (95 % CI: -6.36 to 3.97) in the fractionated group and -2.85 % (95 % CI: -8.97 to 4.43) in the single-session group (p = 0.9572). Improvement in visual symptoms was seen in 80 % of patients in the fractionated group and 69 % in the single-session group (p = 0.4763). Funnel plots demonstrated minimal publication bias, except for a potential small-study effect in visual symptom outcomes. JBI assessment indicated moderate to high methodological quality across most studies.

CONCLUSION

Both single-session and hypofractionated GKRS appear to be effective and safe treatment options for OCH, with comparable clinical outcomes. Hypofractionation may offer advantages in select patients with optic nerve proximity, though current evidence does not show statistically significant differences between approaches. Single-session GKRS remains a pragmatic and effective option in anatomically favorable cases and may be complemented by adaptive or rescue fractionation strategies when tumor response is suboptimal or recurrence is observed. Prospective multicenter studies with standardized outcome reporting are needed to define optimal treatment strategies.

摘要

相似文献

1
Hypofractionated vs. single-session Gamma Knife radiosurgery for orbital cavernous hemangiomas: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and institutional case series.
J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Aug 27;141:111587. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111587.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Gamma knife radiosurgery for orbital cavernous hemangioma: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.伽玛刀放射外科治疗眼眶海绵状血管瘤:系统评价和单臂荟萃分析。
J Neurooncol. 2024 Sep;169(2):221-231. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04723-1. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
The effect of waterbirth on neonatal mortality and morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.水中分娩对新生儿死亡率和发病率的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):180-231. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2105.