Lund Nunu, Søborg Marie-Louise Kulas, Carlsen Louise Ninett, Jensen Rigmor Højland, Petersen Anja Sofie
Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cephalalgia. 2025 Aug;45(8):3331024251364241. doi: 10.1177/03331024251364241. Epub 2025 Aug 29.
BackgroundIt is not well established to what extent medication-overuse occurs in cluster headache (CH), if medication-overuse headache exists in CH and whether the existing criteria for medication-overuse headache are a suitable diagnostic tool in CH. We aimed to examine the prevalence of medication-overuse and probable medication-overuse headache in a well characterized cohort of people with CH and describe associated factors and clinical impact.MethodsParticipants diagnosed with CH according to International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) beta and ICHD-3 were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview investigating medication-overuse and probable medication-overuse headache according to ICHD-3. To add nuance to the debate, we also included a more conservative definition, applying the ICHD-3 criteria for the medication-overuse but specified the headache phenotype to a daily bilateral headache.ResultsIn total, 21% of 433 participants with CH had a medication-overuse according to ICHD-3. Of these, 16% fulfilled the criteria for probable medication-overuse headache according to the ICHD-3, and 12% if excluding isolated triptan overuse. The overused analgesics constituted simple analgesics (52.2%), triptans (37.3%), opioids (29.9%) and combination therapies (20.9%). Associated factors were having chronic CH (odds ratio = 11.4, < 0.00001) and comorbid migraine (odds ratio = 2.35, < 0.05). Participants with probable medication-overuse headache had longer attack duration (30.0 vs. 20.0 minutes, < 0.01) and less effect of acute and preventive medication than those without (20.0 vs. 55.9%, < 0.05 and 13.3 vs. 37.3%, < 0.01, respectively). If applying the conservative definition with a daily bilateral headache along with a medication-overuse, the prevalence was reduced to 4%.ConclusionsProbable medication-overuse headache was present in every sixth participant with CH in this large cross-sectional cohort study. Interestingly, only a smaller proportion was the result of isolated triptan overuse. In CH, where patients often suffer from daily attacks and may suffer from a daily bilateral inter-ictal pain, our very conservative definition noted a prevalence of 4%. While the existing ICHD-3 criteria for medication-overuse headache may not be directly applicable in CH, the applicability and validity of the very conservative definition warrant further investigation. Still, as in other cross-sectional populations with medication-overuse, we noted an association that acute and preventive treatments were less effective in participants with probable medication-overuse headache compared to those without. Altogether, future prospective studies are necessary to establish the exact extent and presentation of medication-overuse headache in CH and determine whether it is an aggravating factor for the disease. We do not recommend discontinuing triptans if suspecting MOH due to ethical concerns.
背景
目前尚不清楚丛集性头痛(CH)中药物过度使用的程度如何,CH中是否存在药物过度使用性头痛,以及现有的药物过度使用性头痛标准是否是CH中合适的诊断工具。我们旨在研究一组特征明确的CH患者中药物过度使用和可能的药物过度使用性头痛的患病率,并描述相关因素和临床影响。
方法
邀请根据《国际头痛疾病分类》第三版(ICHD - 3)beta版和ICHD - 3诊断为CH的参与者参加一项半结构式访谈,根据ICHD - 3调查药物过度使用和可能的药物过度使用性头痛。为了使讨论更细致入微,我们还纳入了一个更保守的定义,即应用ICHD - 3中药物过度使用的标准,但将头痛表型指定为每日双侧头痛。
结果
在433名CH患者中,根据ICHD - 3,共有21%的患者存在药物过度使用。其中,16%的患者符合ICHD - 3中可能的药物过度使用性头痛标准,若排除单独使用曲坦类药物过度使用的情况,则为12%。过度使用的镇痛药包括单纯镇痛药(52.2%)、曲坦类药物(37.3%)、阿片类药物(29.9%)和联合疗法(20.9%)。相关因素包括患有慢性CH(比值比 = 11.4,< 0.00001)和合并偏头痛(比值比 = 2.35,< 0.05)。与没有可能的药物过度使用性头痛的患者相比,可能患有药物过度使用性头痛的患者发作持续时间更长(30.0分钟对20.0分钟,< 0.01),急性和预防性药物的效果更差(分别为20.0%对55.9%,< 0.05;13.3%对37.3%,< 0.01)。如果应用每日双侧头痛伴药物过度使用的保守定义,患病率降至4%。
结论
在这项大型横断面队列研究中,每六名CH患者中就有一名可能患有药物过度使用性头痛。有趣的是,只有较小比例是单独使用曲坦类药物过度使用的结果。在CH中,患者经常每日发作,可能还患有每日双侧发作间期疼痛,我们非常保守的定义显示患病率为4%。虽然现有的ICHD - 3药物过度使用性头痛标准可能不适用于CH,但这个非常保守的定义的适用性和有效性值得进一步研究。尽管如此,与其他存在药物过度使用的横断面人群一样,我们注意到与没有可能的药物过度使用性头痛的患者相比,可能患有药物过度使用性头痛的患者中急性和预防性治疗效果较差。总之,未来需要进行前瞻性研究,以确定CH中药物过度使用性头痛的确切程度和表现,并确定它是否是该疾病的一个加重因素。出于伦理考虑,我们不建议在怀疑药物过度使用性头痛时停用曲坦类药物。