Prosperi Christine, Truelove Shaun, Carcelen Andrea C, Chongwe Gershom, Mwansa Francis D, Ndubani Phillimon, Simulundu Edgar, Bwalya Innocent C, Hamahuwa Mutinta, Kapungu Kelvin, Matakala Kalumbu H, Musukwa Gloria, Mutale Irene, Betha Evans, Chaavwa Nchimunya, Kampamba Lombe, Matoba Japhet, Munachoonga Passwell, Mufwambi Webster, Situtu Ken, Thuma Philip E, Sakala Constance, Kayeye Princess, Winter Amy K, Ferrari Matthew J, Moss William J, Mutembo Simon
Department of International Health, International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Aug 29;5(8):e0003209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003209. eCollection 2025.
Post-campaign coverage surveys estimate the proportion of previously unvaccinated children vaccinated during supplementary immunization activities (SIA) but cannot address whether susceptible children seronegative to measles and rubella viruses were vaccinated during the SIA. We conducted a cross-sectional serosurvey nested within the November 2020 measles-rubella SIA in Zambia, systematically sampling children aged 9 months to 5 years at 30 SIA sites in Choma and Ndola Districts. A questionnaire administered to caregivers collected the child's demographic information and vaccination history. Dried blood spot specimens were collected from child participants and for Immunoglobulin-G antibodies to measles and rubella viruses by enzyme immunoassay. We used the expected vaccination probability by age derived from Demographic and Health Surveys to quantify the value of the immunization campaign, estimating the proportion of children who would not have otherwise received routine MR doses. Among children enrolled with MR vaccination data (N = 2,364), 2,214 (94%) reported at least one routine MR dose before the SIA. We estimate 5.0% [95%CI, 4.2-5.9%] (n = 118/2364) of children would not have otherwise received routine MR dose 1 without the SIA and 23.4% [95%CI, 21.7-25.1] (n = 553/2364) would not have otherwise received routine MR dose 2. Thus, 1 in 3.5 doses were given to an MR un- or under-vaccinated child who may not have received that dose in the absence of an SIA. Eighty-six percent and 90% of children were measles and rubella seropositive before vaccination during the SIA. Thirty-six percent of children with no prior routine MR dose were measles seropositive, while nine percent of children with two prior routine MR doses were measles seronegative. Although children vaccinated during this SIA were highly likely to have previously received routine vaccinations, the SIA reached a considerable number of susceptible children. Monitoring SIA effectiveness and efficiency through standardized metrics and formats is critical for impactful vaccine delivery strategies.
疫苗接种后覆盖率调查估计了在补充免疫活动(SIA)期间接种疫苗的先前未接种疫苗儿童的比例,但无法确定对麻疹和风疹病毒血清阴性的易感儿童在SIA期间是否接种了疫苗。我们在赞比亚2020年11月的麻疹-风疹SIA中进行了一项横断面血清学调查,在乔马和恩多拉区的30个SIA地点系统地对9个月至5岁的儿童进行抽样。向照料者发放的问卷收集了儿童的人口统计信息和疫苗接种史。从儿童参与者那里采集干血斑标本,并用酶免疫测定法检测麻疹和风疹病毒的免疫球蛋白-G抗体。我们使用从人口与健康调查得出的按年龄预期的疫苗接种概率来量化免疫活动的价值,估计那些原本不会接种常规麻疹-风疹疫苗剂量的儿童比例。在有麻疹-风疹疫苗接种数据的儿童中(N = 2364),2214名(94%)报告在SIA之前至少接种过一剂常规麻疹-风疹疫苗。我们估计,如果没有SIA,5.0% [95%置信区间,4.2 - 5.9%](n = 118/2364)的儿童原本不会接种常规麻疹-风疹疫苗第一剂,23.4% [95%置信区间,21.7 - 25.1](n = 553/2364)的儿童原本不会接种常规麻疹-风疹疫苗第二剂。因此,每3.5剂中有1剂是给了可能在没有SIA的情况下不会接种该剂量的未接种或未充分接种麻疹-风疹疫苗的儿童。在SIA期间接种疫苗前,86%和90%的儿童麻疹和风疹血清呈阳性。在没有先前常规麻疹-风疹疫苗接种剂量的儿童中,36%的儿童麻疹血清呈阳性,而在有两剂先前常规麻疹-风疹疫苗接种剂量的儿童中,9%的儿童麻疹血清呈阴性。尽管在此SIA期间接种疫苗的儿童很可能先前已接种过常规疫苗,但SIA仍覆盖了相当数量的易感儿童。通过标准化指标和形式监测SIA的有效性和效率对于有效的疫苗接种策略至关重要。