Suppr超能文献

一项评估腹会阴切除术后预防性负压伤口治疗安全性和有效性的研究方案(VACPAC研究)。

Protocol for a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after abdominal perineal resection (VACPAC study).

作者信息

Takami Takuya, Itatani Yoshiro, Yoshida Yu, Hoshino Nobuaki, Ohno Ryo, Okamura Ryosuke, Hida Koya, Obama Kazutaka

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Aug 29;20(8):e0331361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331361. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal perineal resection (APR) is a surgical procedure for rectal cancer that frequently results in perineal wound surgical site infections (SSI), particularly in high-risk patients undergoing preoperative treatment. SSI after APR is associated with prolonged hospital stay, increased medical costs, and delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, potentially leading to poor prognosis. Although omentoplasty and myocutaneous flap reconstruction have been used to prevent SSI, they are not always feasible. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (pNPWT) has been shown to reduce SSI in high-risk wounds; however, its efficacy in APR remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pNPWT in preventing perineal wound SSI after APR.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This is a multi-institutional, single-arm trial investigating pNPWT after APR. The study includes patients undergoing APR for malignant rectal tumors who meet the high-risk criteria for SSI. The intervention involves applying the 3M™ Prevena™ Plus Customizable system immediately after perineal skin closure, maintaining pNPWT for up to 7 days. The primary endpoint is the incidence of perineal wound SSI within 30 days. Secondary endpoints include postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade III or higher), hospital stay, and completion proportion of pNPWT.

DISCUSSION

This study seeks to provide clinical evidence of the efficacy of pNPWT in reducing perineal wound SSI after APR. Given its ease of application and minimal invasiveness, pNPWT may serve as an effective approach for SSI prevention. These findings may contribute to the establishment of a standardized preventive approach for perineal wound management after APR.

摘要

引言

腹会阴联合切除术(APR)是一种用于直肠癌的外科手术,常导致会阴伤口手术部位感染(SSI),尤其是在接受术前治疗的高危患者中。APR术后的SSI与住院时间延长、医疗费用增加以及辅助化疗开始延迟有关,可能导致预后不良。尽管网膜成形术和肌皮瓣重建已被用于预防SSI,但它们并不总是可行的。预防性负压伤口治疗(pNPWT)已被证明可减少高危伤口的SSI;然而,其在APR中的疗效仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估pNPWT在预防APR后会阴伤口SSI中的安全性和疗效。

方法和材料

这是一项多机构单臂试验,研究APR后的pNPWT。该研究纳入了因恶性直肠肿瘤接受APR且符合SSI高危标准的患者。干预措施包括在会阴皮肤闭合后立即应用3M™ Prevena™ Plus可定制系统,维持pNPWT长达7天。主要终点是30天内会阴伤口SSI的发生率。次要终点包括术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo III级或更高)、住院时间和pNPWT的完成比例。

讨论

本研究旨在提供pNPWT在降低APR后会阴伤口SSI疗效的临床证据。鉴于其易于应用和微创性,pNPWT可能是预防SSI的有效方法。这些发现可能有助于建立APR后会阴伤口管理的标准化预防方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b83f/12396706/8a04d8fda7eb/pone.0331361.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验