• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

逆行软性输尿管镜与经皮肾镜取石术治疗 2-4cm 肾结石的比较。

Comparison between Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones of 2-4 cm.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.

"Sfantul Ioan" Emergency Clinical Hospital, 042122 Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 8;59(1):124. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010124.

DOI:10.3390/medicina59010124
PMID:36676748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9864526/
Abstract

Background and objectives: Renal stones are widespread, with a lifetime prevalence of 10% in adults. Flexible ureteroscopy enables urologists to treat lower calyx stones or even complex renal stones through the natural orifice and achieve an acceptable stone-free rate. Hence, we analyzed the effectiveness and safety of FURS versus PCNL in treating renal stones between 20 and 40 mm in diameter. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 250 consecutive patients with large renal solitary stones (stone burden between 2 and 4 cm) from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (125 patients), in which the patients were treated by a retrograde flexible ureteroscopic approach, and group 2 (125 patients), in which we used percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Stone characteristics and anatomical data were observed based on the computed tomography (CT) and/or KUB (Kidney-ureter-Bladder) radiography imaging archive. Results: The mean stone burden was 26.38 ± 4.453 mm in group 1 and 29.44 ± 4.817 mm in group 2. The stone-free rate after the first ureteroscopy was higher for the PNL(percutaneous nephrolithotomy) group (90.4%) than the F-URS group (68%). After two sessions of ureteroscopy, the SFR was 88.8% in the first group, and after three procedures, the SFR rose to 95.2%. The overall complication rate was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (18.4% vs. 16.8%), but without statistical relevance (p > 0.5). Furthermore, we encountered more grade III and IV complications in the PNL group (8.8% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Flexible ureteroscopy proves to be efficient in treating renal stones over 2 cm. However, the patients must be informed that more than one procedure might be necessary to overcome the entire stone burden.

摘要

背景与目的

肾结石较为常见,成人终生患病率为 10%。软式输尿管镜能够让泌尿科医生通过自然腔道治疗下盏结石,甚至复杂肾结石,达到可接受的无石率。因此,我们分析了 FURS 与 PCNL 治疗直径 20-40mm 肾结石的有效性和安全性。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间 250 例患有大的孤立肾结石(结石负荷 2-4cm)的连续患者。患者被分为两组:组 1(125 例患者)采用逆行软式输尿管镜治疗,组 2(125 例患者)采用经皮肾镜碎石术。根据 CT 和/或 KUB(肾脏-输尿管-膀胱)影像学存档观察结石特征和解剖数据。

结果

组 1的平均结石负荷为 26.38±4.453mm,组 2的平均结石负荷为 29.44±4.817mm。PNL 组(90.4%)的第一次输尿管镜碎石术后无石率高于 F-URS 组(68%)。第一次输尿管镜碎石术后,第一组的 SFR 为 88.8%,经过三次手术后,SFR 上升至 95.2%。组 1的总体并发症发生率高于组 2(18.4% vs. 16.8%),但无统计学意义(p>0.5)。此外,PNL 组出现更多 3 级和 4 级并发症(8.8% vs. 4.8%,p<0.05)。

结论

软式输尿管镜治疗 2cm 以上肾结石有效。然而,必须告知患者可能需要多次手术才能清除所有结石。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc74/9864526/acdf74c7144a/medicina-59-00124-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc74/9864526/170b4eb9627d/medicina-59-00124-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc74/9864526/acdf74c7144a/medicina-59-00124-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc74/9864526/170b4eb9627d/medicina-59-00124-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc74/9864526/acdf74c7144a/medicina-59-00124-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison between Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones of 2-4 cm.逆行软性输尿管镜与经皮肾镜取石术治疗 2-4cm 肾结石的比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 8;59(1):124. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010124.
2
Flexible ureteroscopy with novel flexible ureteral access sheath versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of 2-3 cm renal stones.新型可弯曲输尿管鞘的可弯曲输尿管镜检查与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗2-3厘米肾结石的比较
Int J Urol. 2024 Mar;31(3):281-286. doi: 10.1111/iju.15347. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Comparative outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for pediatric kidney stones larger than 2 cm.软性输尿管镜术与微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗大于 2cm 的儿童肾结石的疗效比较。
Int J Urol. 2021 Jun;28(6):650-655. doi: 10.1111/iju.14532. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
Flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones.输尿管软镜与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的对比
Urol J. 2018 Nov 17;15(6):313-317. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4208.
5
Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment for renal calculi larger than 2 cm: a matched-pair analysis.比较大于 2cm 的肾结石的输尿管软镜和微通道经皮肾镜碎石术:配对分析。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Aug;50(4):501-507. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01336-z. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
6
Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital.输尿管镜检查及激光碎石术(URSL)治疗大型(≥1厘米)儿童结石:一所大学教学医院的治疗结果
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Apr;13(2):202.e1-202.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
7
[Staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones of 2-4 cm in diameter: a randomized controlled trial].[分期逆行软性输尿管镜碎石术与微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径2-4厘米肾结石的随机对照试验]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2016 Dec 20;36(12):1672-1676.
8
Comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of 2 and 3cm renal lithiasis.经皮肾镜取石术与软性输尿管镜治疗2至3厘米肾结石的比较。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Apr;43(3):111-117. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
9
Combined use of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric multiple kidney stones.软性输尿管镜碎石术联合微经皮肾镜取石术治疗小儿多发性肾结石。
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Jun;14(3):281.e1-281.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
10
Outcomes and Costs Following Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy or Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for 1-2-cm Renal Stones: Data From a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术或软性输尿管镜碎石术治疗1-2厘米肾结石后的疗效与成本:一项前瞻性随机临床试验的数据
J Urol. 2023 Jun;209(6):1151-1158. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003397. Epub 2023 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Disruptions in Renal Stone Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Retrospective Single-Center Study.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间肾结石治疗的中断:一项回顾性单中心研究
Maedica (Bucur). 2025 Jun;20(2):243-249. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.243.
2
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of stone-free rates and complication profiles.经皮肾镜取石术与逆行性肾内手术:结石清除率和并发症情况的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04707-8.
3
Risk factors for urosepsis following ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of Sepsis in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.逆行性肾内手术中脓毒症的风险:文献系统综述
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Aug 30;44:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.08.008. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol.经皮肾镜碎石术、软性输尿管镜碎石术和体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾下极结石的临床和成本效益:肾下极结石随机对照试验(PUrE RCT)方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 4;21(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04326-x.
3
输尿管镜碎石术后尿脓毒症的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2025 Jun 19;12:1603311. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1603311. eCollection 2025.
4
Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis.经肋缘下超声引导的经皮肾镜取石术(SUGA-PNL)与逆行性肾内手术治疗大体积孤立性上盏结石的前瞻性随机分析。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Oct 29;52(1):154. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5.
5
Impact of frailty on perioperative outcomes following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in older persons: evidence from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample.衰弱对老年人经皮肾镜取石术围手术期结局的影响:来自美国全国住院患者样本的证据。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Jun 19;52(1):95. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01595-y.
6
Effect of core preventative screening on kidney stone surgical patterns.核心预防筛查对肾结石手术模式的影响。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jul;56(7):2131-2139. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03930-5. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
7
Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy and Da Vinci Robotic Surgery in Community Patients with Renal Pelvic Stones Larger than 2 cm.社区 2cm 以上肾盂结石患者行软性输尿管镜与达芬奇机器人手术的疗效比较分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 29;59(8):1395. doi: 10.3390/medicina59081395.
8
Efficacy and safety of various endosurgical procedures for management of large renal stone: a systemic review and network meta-analysis of randomised control trials.各种内镜手术治疗大肾结石的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Jun 8;51(1):87. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01459-x.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy in terms of cost-effectiveness in patients with 10-30 mm renal stones.
经皮肾镜碎石术与输尿管软镜碎石术治疗 10-30mm 肾结石患者的成本效益比较。
Urologia. 2020 Feb;87(1):41-46. doi: 10.1177/0391560319876805. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
4
Comparison of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating intermediatesize renal stones (2-3cm): a meta-analysis and systematic review.比较逆行性软性输尿管镜和经皮肾镜取石术治疗中等大小肾结石(2-3cm):荟萃分析和系统评价。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Jan-Feb;45(1):10-22. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0510.
5
Comparative study of the treatment of 20-30 mm renal stones with miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy in obese patients.肥胖患者 20-30mm 肾结石经皮肾镜碎石术与软性输尿管镜碎石术治疗的对比研究。
World J Urol. 2018 Aug;36(8):1309-1314. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2258-y. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
6
Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Lower Calyceal Calculi of 2-3 cm in Patients With Solitary Kidney.经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗孤立肾患者2-3厘米下盏结石的比较
Urology. 2018 May;115:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.063. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis to compare success rates of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm: An update.比较逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径>2厘米肾结石成功率的系统评价和荟萃分析:最新进展
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(49):e9119. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009119.
8
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Large Stones in Patients with a Solitary Kidney.倾向评分匹配分析:比较逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗孤立肾患者的大结石
J Endourol. 2018 Mar;32(3):198-204. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0482.
9
Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Treating 20-40 mm Renal Stones.经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗20 - 40毫米肾结石的比较
Urol J. 2017 Mar 16;14(2):2995-2999.
10
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of kidney stones up to 2 cm in patients with solitary kidney: a single centre experience.经皮肾镜取石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗单肾肾结石患者2厘米及以下结石:单中心经验
BMC Urol. 2017 Jan 18;17(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0200-z.