Machingo Taryn A, Bruton Alisha M, Ryan Jennifer J, Johnstone Jeanette M
Center for Mental Health Innovation, Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Center for Evidence-based Policy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Adv Neurodev Disord. 2024 Dec 18. doi: 10.1007/s41252-024-00433-x.
Neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (NLR, PLR) are easily calculated from routine blood tests and are increasingly being used in research to assess disease severity in inflammatory, infectious, and psychiatric conditions. The goal of this systematic scoping review was to broadly examine the literature on NLR and PLR and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
The PubMed/Medline, PsychInfo, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number, Google Scholar, Directory of Open Access Journals, and ProQuest databases were searched.
Among the 1542 articles evaluated, 15 were included. Fourteen studies evaluated children and adolescents with ADHD and one study evaluated adults. Study outcomes included the comparison of mean NLR and PLR values between ADHD and non-ADHD groups and the association of NLR and PLR values with measures of ADHD symptom severity. Four studies used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to identify potential cut points for the diagnosis of ADHD. Assessing NLR and PLR is economical and minimally invasive.
Based on the 15 studies reviewed, findings suggest NLR and PLR may be promising biomarkers for ADHD. Additional research is justified to further investigate if routine incorporation of NLR and PLR into research and clinical practice could beneficially impact the diagnosis and treatment of patients with ADHD.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)可通过常规血液检查轻松计算得出,并且在评估炎症、感染和精神疾病的疾病严重程度的研究中越来越多地被使用。本系统综述的目的是广泛考察有关NLR、PLR与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的文献。
检索了PubMed/Medline、PsychInfo、Scopus、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、护理及相关健康文献累积索引、ClinicalTrials.gov、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台、国际标准随机对照试验编号、谷歌学术、开放获取期刊目录和ProQuest数据库。
在评估的1542篇文章中,纳入了15篇。14项研究评估了患有ADHD的儿童和青少年,1项研究评估了成年人。研究结果包括比较ADHD组和非ADHD组的平均NLR和PLR值,以及NLR和PLR值与ADHD症状严重程度测量指标的关联。4项研究使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来确定ADHD诊断的潜在切点。评估NLR和PLR经济且微创。
基于所综述的15项研究,结果表明NLR和PLR可能是ADHD有前景的生物标志物。进一步研究将NLR和PLR常规纳入研究和临床实践是否能有益地影响ADHD患者的诊断和治疗是合理的。