Shi Dan-Dan, Ding Jing, Tian Ju
Department of Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan 528400, Guangdong Province, China.
Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan 528400, Guangdong Province, China.
World J Clin Cases. 2025 Sep 26;13(27):108117. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i27.108117.
This article explores the association between salivary uric acid (UA) and periodontitis, systematically analyzing its dual roles and research progress. Studies indicate that UA acts as a primary antioxidant in saliva under physiological conditions (accounting for 70%), protecting periodontal tissues by scavenging reactive oxygen species. However, when gum disease becomes severe, UA can switch roles and fuel inflammation, worsening tissue damage. Lorente 's research found an independent inverse correlation between salivary UA levels and periodontitis severity (odds ratio = 6.14, = 0.001), establishing 111 nmol/mL as a diagnostic threshold (area under the curve = 66%). Nevertheless, limitations include sample heterogeneity and failure to distinguish between gingivitis and periodontitis. Mechanistically, three hypotheses are proposed: The Antioxidant Depletion Hypothesis (UA oxidation consumption leading to feedback loops), the Microbial Metabolic Hijacking Hypothesis (pathogens utilizing UA as a carbon source to disrupt redox balance), and the Epithelial Barrier Dysfunction Hypothesis (UA deficiency causing downregulation of tight junction proteins). Future research should prioritize longitudinal cohorts to validate predictive value, integrate multi-omics to explore dysregulated signatures, and develop UA supplementation or targeted antioxidant therapies. This study provides novel insights into periodontitis diagnosis and mechanisms, advancing the application of salivary biomarkers in precision periodontics.
本文探讨唾液尿酸(UA)与牙周炎之间的关联,系统分析其双重作用及研究进展。研究表明,在生理条件下(占70%),UA在唾液中作为主要抗氧化剂,通过清除活性氧来保护牙周组织。然而,当牙龈疾病严重时,UA会转变作用并加剧炎症,使组织损伤恶化。洛伦特的研究发现唾液UA水平与牙周炎严重程度之间存在独立的负相关(优势比 = 6.14,P = 0.001),确定111 nmol/mL作为诊断阈值(曲线下面积 = 66%)。然而,局限性包括样本异质性以及未能区分牙龈炎和牙周炎。从机制上提出了三种假说:抗氧化剂耗竭假说(UA氧化消耗导致反馈回路)、微生物代谢劫持假说(病原体利用UA作为碳源破坏氧化还原平衡)和上皮屏障功能障碍假说(UA缺乏导致紧密连接蛋白下调)。未来研究应优先开展纵向队列研究以验证预测价值,整合多组学技术以探索失调特征,并开发UA补充剂或靶向抗氧化疗法。本研究为牙周炎的诊断和机制提供了新见解,推动了唾液生物标志物在精准牙周病学中的应用。