Park Sun-Kyung, Lee Jiwon, Kim Myoung Hwa, Park Jihoon, Kim Hyun-Chang
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Keimyung University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Anesth. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1007/s00540-025-03569-9.
One-lung ventilation (OLV) during thoracic surgery often disturbs systemic oxygenation. Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is influenced by body temperature; however, the effect of heated humidified circuits on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and arterial oxygenation during OLV remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of heated humidified circuits on arterial oxygenation during OLV for thoracic surgery, compared with conventional non-heated circuits.
Patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery were randomly assigned to the heated humidified circuit or conventional breathing circuit group. During two-lung ventilation, tidal volume was set at 8 ml/kg with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO) of 0.5, and during OLV, it was adjusted to 6 ml/kg with a FiO of 1.0. Arterial blood gas measurements were obtained preoperatively, during two-lung ventilation, at 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after initiating OLV. The primary outcome was the partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO) at 30 min after initiating OLV.
Ninety-seven patients were included in the final analysis. The heated humidified circuit group had significantly higher PaO₂ at 30 min after initiating OLV than the control group (estimated mean [standard error], 211.3 [13.4] vs. 146.2 [13.2] mmHg; P = 0.004). The mean PaO at 15 and 45 min was significantly higher in the heated humidified circuit group.
Using heated humidified circuits significantly improves PaO during OLV in patients undergoing thoracic surgery compared to conventional circuits. These findings suggest that heated humidified circuits can be considered as an option when hypoxemia persists despite other interventions.
胸外科手术期间的单肺通气(OLV)常干扰全身氧合。低氧性肺血管收缩受体温影响;然而,加热湿化回路对OLV期间低氧性肺血管收缩和动脉氧合的影响仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨与传统非加热回路相比,加热湿化回路对胸外科手术OLV期间动脉氧合的影响。
接受电视辅助胸外科手术的患者被随机分配至加热湿化回路组或传统呼吸回路组。在双肺通气期间,潮气量设定为8 ml/kg,吸入氧分数(FiO)为0.5,在OLV期间,调整为6 ml/kg,FiO为1.0。在术前、双肺通气期间、开始OLV后15、30、45和60分钟获取动脉血气测量值。主要结局是开始OLV后30分钟时动脉血中的氧分压(PaO)。
97例患者纳入最终分析。加热湿化回路组在开始OLV后30分钟时的PaO₂显著高于对照组(估计均值[标准误],211.3[13.4] vs. 146.2[13.2] mmHg;P = 0.004)。加热湿化回路组在15和45分钟时的平均PaO显著更高。
与传统回路相比,使用加热湿化回路可显著改善胸外科手术患者OLV期间的PaO。这些发现表明,尽管采取了其他干预措施但低氧血症仍持续存在时,加热湿化回路可被视为一种选择。