文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

2017年至2023年女性参与心血管试验情况:一项系统评价

Participation of Women in Cardiovascular Trials From 2017 to 2023: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Rivera Frederick Berro, Magalong John Vincent, Bantayan Nathan Ross B, Tesoro Nicole, Milan Mark Jason, Purewal Vikramjit, Pine Polyn Luz S, Tsai Chieh-Mei, Navar Ann Marie, Mulvagh Sharon L, Januzzi James, Gibson C Michael, Lala-Trindade Anuradha, Cheng Susan, Lara-Breitinger Kyla, Guerrero Mayra, Gulati Martha

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

College of Medicine, San Beda University, Manila, Philippines.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2529104. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29104.


DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29104
PMID:40886088
Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of death globally for both men and women, yet women remain historically underrepresented in CV clinical trials, despite facing a disproportionately high burden of morbidity and mortality in many forms of CV disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine the representation of women across a broad range of CV trials. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The participation of women in CV trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 2017 to 2023 was systematically determined through the extraction of publicly available information. Data were extracted to identify the country of study, disease type, trial size, clinical intervention, and age of the participants. The proportion of women and the ratio of number of female to male participants (F:M ratio) were calculated for each trial. The women's participation:prevalence ratio (PPR) was estimated for each trial based on the relative prevalence of the disease by sex in the specified region. FINDINGS: A total of 1079 registered CV trials were identified, including 1 396 104 participants, of whom 571 641 (41.0%) were women. The F:M ratio was significantly lower for studies on arrhythmia (median [IQR], 0.5), coronary heart disease (median [IQR], 0.39 [0.33-0.70]), acute coronary syndrome (median [IQR], 0.32 [0.24-0.51]), and heart failure (median [IQR], 0.51 [0.32-0.87]) but higher for obesity (median [IQR], 1.44 [1.08-4.50]) and pulmonary hypertension (median [IQR], 2.86 [1.50-3.97]) trials. The F:M ratio was higher for trials on lifestyle interventions (median [IQR], 1.51 [0.77-3.24]) than for drug trials. PPRs were low for clinical trials on coronary heart disease (median [IQR], 0.66 [0.50-0.86]), acute coronary syndrome (median [IQR], 0.79 [0.51-0.87]), and stroke (median [IQR], 0.74 [0.61-0.95]). Representation of women in CV trials varied by disease state, region, intervention, and sponsor type. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings highlight both progress and persistent challenges in representation of women within CV trials. These gaps not only limit the generalizability of trial outcomes but also perpetuate inequities in evidence-based care for women with CV conditions.

摘要

重要性:心血管疾病是全球男性和女性的首要死因,然而,尽管在多种形式的心血管疾病中,女性面临着不成比例的高发病率和死亡率负担,但在心血管临床试验中,女性的参与人数历来较少。 目的:确定女性在广泛的心血管试验中的参与情况。 证据综述:通过提取公开可用信息,系统地确定了2017年至2023年在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的心血管试验中女性的参与情况。提取数据以确定研究国家、疾病类型、试验规模、临床干预措施以及参与者的年龄。计算每个试验中女性的比例以及女性与男性参与者的数量比(F:M比)。根据特定区域按性别划分的疾病相对患病率,估计每个试验的女性参与率与患病率之比(PPR)。 研究结果:共识别出1079项注册的心血管试验,包括1396104名参与者,其中571641名(41.0%)为女性。在心律失常研究(中位数[四分位间距],0.5)、冠心病(中位数[四分位间距],0.39[0.33 - 0.70])、急性冠脉综合征(中位数[四分位间距],0.32[0.24 - 0.51])和心力衰竭(中位数[四分位间距],0.51[0.32 - 0.87])试验中,F:M比显著较低,但在肥胖(中位数[四分位间距],1.44[1.08 - 4.50])和肺动脉高压(中位数[四分位间距],2.86[1.50 - 3.97])试验中较高。生活方式干预试验(中位数[四分位间距],1.51[0.77 - 3.24])的F:M比高于药物试验。冠心病(中位数[四分位间距],0.66[0.50 - 0.86])、急性冠脉综合征(中位数[四分位间距],0.79[0.51 - 0.87])和中风(中位数[四分位间距],0.74[0.61 - 0.95])临床试验的PPR较低。心血管试验中女性的参与情况因疾病状态、地区、干预措施和申办者类型而异。 结论及意义:这些发现凸显了心血管试验中女性参与方面的进展和持续存在的挑战。这些差距不仅限制了试验结果的普遍性,还使患有心血管疾病的女性在循证护理方面的不平等长期存在。

相似文献

[1]
Participation of Women in Cardiovascular Trials From 2017 to 2023: A Systematic Review.

JAMA Netw Open. 2025-8-1

[2]
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks

2025-1

[3]
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-5-6

[4]
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-3-25

[5]
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[6]
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-1-5

[7]
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.

Syst Rev. 2024-11-26

[8]
Replacing salt with low-sodium salt substitutes (LSSS) for cardiovascular health in adults, children and pregnant women.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-8-10

[9]
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-8-22

[10]
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].

Epidemiol Prev. 2013

本文引用的文献

[1]
Enrollment of Females in Randomized Trials for Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists: A Systematic Review.

JACC Adv. 2024-11-8

[2]
Outcomes of Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia and Chronic Kidney Disease: A National Perspective.

Cardiorenal Med. 2024

[3]
Sex Disparity in the In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients with Kidney Disease Admitted for Myocardial Infarction: Insights from a Large National Database.

Cardiorenal Med. 2024

[4]
Sex- and Gender-Related Differences in Obesity: From Pathophysiological Mechanisms to Clinical Implications.

Int J Mol Sci. 2024-7-4

[5]
A Systematic Review of Sex-Specific Reporting in Heart Failure Clinical Trials: Trial Flow and Results.

JACC Adv. 2022-9-21

[6]
Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Outcomes and Cholesterol-Lowering Efficacy of PCSK9 Inhibitors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

JACC Adv. 2023-10-28

[7]
Sex, racial, ethnic, and geographical disparities in major adverse cardiovascular outcome of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists among patients with and without diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials.

J Clin Lipidol. 2024

[8]
Sex differences in transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes among patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis.

Heart Lung. 2024

[9]
Underrepresentation of Women in Revascularization Trials.

JAMA Cardiol. 2024-6-1

[10]
Protection by inclusion: Increasing enrollment of women in cardiovascular trials.

Am Heart J Plus. 2022-1-31

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索