• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国老年医疗福利设施入住相关因素:一项横断面机器学习研究。

Factors associated with admission to elderly medical-welfare facilities in South Korea: a cross-sectional machine-learning study.

作者信息

Lim Ji Young, Kim Eun Joo, Kim Seong Kwang

机构信息

Inha University, Incheon, Korea (the Republic of).

Gangneung-Wonju National University, Wonju-si, Korea (the Republic of).

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 31;15(8):e093591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093591.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093591
PMID:40887126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12406814/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the key factors associated with admission to elderly medical-welfare facilities in South Korea and to evaluate their relative importance using machine learning techniques, providing an evidence base for policy in a rapidly ageing society.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional secondary data analysis.

SETTING

The analysis was conducted using the National Health Insurance Service -Senior database, a large-scale public dataset constructed to be statistically representative of the elderly population in South Korea.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 48 614 elderly individuals aged 60-80 years, selected through a scientifically rigorous stratified random sampling method.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the binary classification of an individual's long-term care arrangement: admission to a facility-based service versus utilisation of home-based care. The secondary outcome was the relative importance and contribution of a wide range of demographic, health-status and care-related variables in predicting facility admission.

RESULTS

After addressing severe class imbalance with the synthetic minority over-sampling technique, our final random forest model demonstrated excellent predictive power, achieving a sensitivity of 0.856 and a balanced accuracy of 0.921. An analysis of feature importance using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) revealed that the most dominant predictor was an individual's cohabitation with institutional staff (mean SHAP value ≈ 0.180), indicating pre-existing contact with the formal care system. Other critical factors included the absence of a primary caregiver (≈ 0.056), being fully dependent due to dementia (≈ 0.017) and the degree of functional impairment as measured by the activities of daily living (ADL) score (≈ 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Admission to medical-welfare facilities in South Korea is a multifactorial issue, most strongly driven by the erosion of informal care support systems combined with severe health decline, particularly in cognitive and physical function. These evidence-based findings highlight the need for policy interventions that strengthen community-based integrated care and enhance support for family caregivers. Such strategies are essential for promoting ageing-in-place, ensuring the long-term sustainability of the public long-term care system and ultimately improving the quality of life for the nation's growing elderly population.

摘要

目的

确定与韩国老年医疗福利设施入住相关的关键因素,并使用机器学习技术评估其相对重要性,为快速老龄化社会的政策提供证据基础。

设计

横断面二次数据分析。

背景

分析使用国民健康保险服务-老年人数据库进行,该大型公共数据集在统计学上代表了韩国老年人口。

参与者

通过科学严谨的分层随机抽样方法选取了48614名60至80岁的老年人。

主要和次要结局指标

主要结局是个人长期护理安排的二元分类:入住机构服务与使用居家护理。次要结局是一系列人口统计学、健康状况和护理相关变量在预测机构入住方面的相对重要性和贡献。

结果

使用合成少数过采样技术解决严重的类别不平衡问题后,我们最终的随机森林模型显示出出色的预测能力,灵敏度达到0.856,平衡准确率达到0.921。使用夏普利值法(SHAP)进行的特征重要性分析表明,最主要的预测因素是个人与机构工作人员的同居情况(平均SHAP值≈0.180),这表明与正式护理系统有预先存在的接触。其他关键因素包括没有主要照顾者(≈0.056)、因痴呆症而完全依赖他人(≈0.017)以及通过日常生活活动(ADL)评分衡量的功能受损程度(≈0.017)。

结论

韩国老年医疗福利设施的入住是一个多因素问题,最主要的驱动因素是非正式护理支持系统的侵蚀以及严重的健康衰退,尤其是认知和身体功能方面。这些基于证据的发现凸显了政策干预的必要性,即加强基于社区的综合护理并增强对家庭照顾者的支持。此类策略对于促进就地养老、确保公共长期护理系统的长期可持续性以及最终改善该国不断增长的老年人口的生活质量至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/12406814/bc2c8d8f78d1/bmjopen-15-8-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/12406814/686417b9d7d0/bmjopen-15-8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/12406814/04edfa566690/bmjopen-15-8-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/12406814/fd06cb664a31/bmjopen-15-8-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/12406814/bc2c8d8f78d1/bmjopen-15-8-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/12406814/686417b9d7d0/bmjopen-15-8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/12406814/04edfa566690/bmjopen-15-8-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/12406814/fd06cb664a31/bmjopen-15-8-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7699/12406814/bc2c8d8f78d1/bmjopen-15-8-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors associated with admission to elderly medical-welfare facilities in South Korea: a cross-sectional machine-learning study.韩国老年医疗福利设施入住相关因素:一项横断面机器学习研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 31;15(8):e093591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093591.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.护理机构中预防老年人跌倒的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 20;8:CD016064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016064.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
MarkVCID cerebral small vessel consortium: I. Enrollment, clinical, fluid protocols.马克 VCID 脑小血管联盟:一、入组、临床、液体方案。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Apr;17(4):704-715. doi: 10.1002/alz.12215. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
10
Machine learning-based identification of key biotic and abiotic drivers of mineral weathering rate in a complex enhanced weathering experiment.在一项复杂的强化风化实验中,基于机器学习识别矿物风化速率的关键生物和非生物驱动因素。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Jul 3;5:71. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19252.2. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Adoption of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Robots in Long-Term Care Homes by Health Care Providers: Scoping Review.采用人工智能机器人在长期护理院的医疗保健提供者:范围综述。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Aug 27;7:e55257. doi: 10.2196/55257.
2
Development of a Nurse Turnover Prediction Model in Korea Using Machine Learning.利用机器学习开发韩国护士离职预测模型
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 28;11(11):1583. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111583.
3
An overview of systems for providing integrated and comprehensive care for older people in Japan.日本为老年人提供综合全面护理的系统概述。
Arch Public Health. 2023 May 4;81(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01076-5.
4
Risk factors for nursing home admission among older adults: Analysis of basic movements and activities of daily living.老年人入住养老院的风险因素:基本动作和日常生活活动分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 27;18(1):e0279312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279312. eCollection 2023.
5
Aging-in-place preferences and institutionalization among Japanese older adults: a 7-year longitudinal study.日本老年人就地老化偏好与机构化:一项 7 年纵向研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 21;22(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02766-5.
6
Combining machine learning and conventional statistical approaches for risk factor discovery in a large cohort study.结合机器学习和传统统计方法在大型队列研究中发现风险因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 26;11(1):22997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02476-9.
7
Worlds of long-term care: A typology of OECD countries.长期护理的世界:经合组织国家的类型学。
Health Policy. 2021 May;125(5):609-617. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
8
Review of evolution of the public long-term care insurance (LTCI) system in different countries: influence and challenge.不同国家公共长期护理保险(LTCI)制度演变的回顾:影响与挑战。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 20;20(1):1057. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05878-z.
9
Long-Term Care System in Japan.日本的长期护理系统。
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2020 Sep;24(3):174-180. doi: 10.4235/agmr.20.0037. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
10
Notes About Comparing Long-term Care Expenditures Across Countries Comment on "Financing Long-term Care: Lessons From Japan".关于比较国家间长期护理支出的说明 评论“长期护理融资:来自日本的经验教训”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Feb 1;9(2):80-82. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.87.