Suppr超能文献

基于MAGGIC风险评分的风险分层,用于选择将从多学科护理中获益的心力衰竭患者。

MAGGIC risk score-based risk stratification for selecting patients with heart failure who will benefit from multidisciplinary care.

作者信息

Kinugasa Yoshiharu, Nakamura Kensuke, Hirai Masayuki, Manba Midori, Ishiga Natsuko, Sota Takeshi, Nakayama Natsuko, Ota Tomoki, Kato Masahiko, Kato Masaru

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Endocrinology and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Endocrinology and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2025 Aug 31;12(2):e003496. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003496.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Guidelines worldwide recommend specialist outpatient clinics staffed by a multidisciplinary team for management of patients with heart failure (HF). However, there is limited information on how best to select these patients for efficient use of resources. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of team-based care for patients with HF after discharge from hospital according to duration of intervention and stratification of patients according to risk.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 185 eligible patients who were hospitalised with acute decompensated HF at our institution between January 2021 and June 2023. Multidisciplinary team care was defined as outpatient follow-up by both cardiologists and nurses postdischarge. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular-related death and readmission with HF within 1 year, which was compared between patients receiving HF team care and those receiving standard follow-up.

RESULTS

HF team care was provided for 53.0% of patients, who were younger than those receiving standard follow-up and required more oral inotropes, tolvaptan and amiodarone. Among those receiving HF team care, the majority (58.2%) had an intervention duration of 30 days or less after discharge. After adjusting for background differences by inverse probability of treatment weighting, HF team care was associated with favourable 180-day outcomes, but there was no significant between-group difference in the 1-year primary outcomes. In subgroup analysis, patients with a higher Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure score (≥28), indicating a higher risk of exacerbation of HF, had significantly lower 1-year event rates with HF team care (p value for interaction <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary HF team care is most effective for patients at higher risk of exacerbation of HF. A risk score model may optimise patient selection for specialised care.

摘要

目的

全球指南推荐由多学科团队配备人员的专科门诊用于管理心力衰竭(HF)患者。然而,关于如何最佳选择这些患者以有效利用资源的信息有限。本研究旨在根据干预持续时间和患者风险分层,确定出院后HF患者基于团队护理的有效性。

方法

我们回顾性确定了2021年1月至2023年6月期间在我们机构因急性失代偿性HF住院的185例符合条件的患者。多学科团队护理定义为出院后由心脏病专家和护士进行门诊随访。主要结局是心血管相关死亡和1年内因HF再次入院的复合结局,在接受HF团队护理的患者和接受标准随访的患者之间进行比较。

结果

53.0%的患者接受了HF团队护理,这些患者比接受标准随访的患者更年轻,需要更多的口服强心剂、托伐普坦和胺碘酮。在接受HF团队护理的患者中,大多数(58.2%)出院后的干预持续时间为30天或更短。通过治疗权重的逆概率调整背景差异后,HF团队护理与良好的180天结局相关,但1年主要结局的组间差异无统计学意义。在亚组分析中,慢性心力衰竭全球荟萃分析组评分较高(≥28)的患者,表明HF恶化风险较高,接受HF团队护理的1年事件发生率显著较低(交互作用p值<0.05)。

结论

多学科HF团队护理对HF恶化风险较高的患者最有效。风险评分模型可能会优化专科护理的患者选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/12406894/0a1fd0c40c47/openhrt-12-2-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验