Suppr超能文献

对人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者进行血糖评估时,糖化血红蛋白、糖化白蛋白和空腹血糖的比较分析。

A comparative analysis of HbA1c, glycated albumin, and fasting plasma glucose for glycemic assessment in people living with HIV.

作者信息

Liang Chih-Wei, Kuo Shin-Huei, Lee Chun-Yuan, Lin Shang-Yi, Chang Ya-Ting, Huang Chung-Hao, Chen Tun-Chieh, Lin Chun-Yu, Tsai Jih-Jin, Chen Yen-Hsu, Lu Po-Liang

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2025.08.013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

People living with HIV (PLWH) are at increased risk for metabolic disorders, including diabetes and prediabetes. While hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is widely used for glycemic assessment, its reliability in PLWH is questioned due to altered red blood cell turnover. Glycated albumin (GA) has been proposed as an alternative, but its diagnostic utility remains unclear in PLWH. This study aims to compare the correlations of HbA1c and GA with fasting plasma glucose (FPG), evaluate their diagnostic performance, and identify factors influencing discrepancies between them in PLWH.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study included 236 PLWH with documented FPG, HbA1c, and GA levels. Correlations between glycemic markers were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Diagnostic performance for prediabetes and diabetes was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and a GA cut-off was determined using the Youden index. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of HbA1c-GA mismatch.

RESULTS

HbA1c showed a moderate correlation with FPG (r = 0.33, p value < 0.001), while GA had a weaker correlation (r = 0.18, p value = 0.005). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detecting glycemic abnormalities was 0.66 for HbA1c and 0.57 for GA. The optimal GA cut-off for prediabetes derived from ROC analysis was 12.42 %, improving sensitivity but reducing specificity. Multivariable analysis identified low mean corpuscular volume (MCV <80 fL) as an independent predictor of HbA1c-GA mismatch (odds ratio = 4.94, 95 % confidence interval: 1.95-12.50, pvalue < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

HbA1c or GA alone do not reliably capture glycemic abnormalities in PLWH. A lower GA cut-off (12.42 %) for prediabetes improves sensitivity but remains suboptimal. A combined approach incorporating FPG is recommended to enhance prediabetes and diabetes screening accuracy in this population.

摘要

背景

人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者(PLWH)患代谢紊乱(包括糖尿病和糖尿病前期)的风险增加。虽然糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)广泛用于血糖评估,但由于红细胞周转改变,其在PLWH中的可靠性受到质疑。糖化白蛋白(GA)已被提议作为一种替代指标,但其在PLWH中的诊断效用仍不明确。本研究旨在比较HbA1c和GA与空腹血糖(FPG)的相关性,评估它们的诊断性能,并确定影响PLWH中两者差异的因素。

方法

这项回顾性横断面研究纳入了236例有记录的FPG、HbA1c和GA水平的PLWH。使用Pearson相关系数评估血糖标志物之间的相关性。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估糖尿病前期和糖尿病的诊断性能,并使用约登指数确定GA临界值。进行多变量逻辑回归以确定HbA1c - GA不匹配的预测因素。

结果

HbA1c与FPG呈中度相关(r = 0.33,p值<0.001),而GA的相关性较弱(r = 0.18,p值 = 0.005)。检测血糖异常的ROC曲线下面积(AUC),HbA1c为0.66,GA为0.57。通过ROC分析得出的糖尿病前期的最佳GA临界值为12.42%,提高了敏感性但降低了特异性。多变量分析确定低平均红细胞体积(MCV <80 fL)是HbA1c - GA不匹配的独立预测因素(优势比 = 4.94,95%置信区间:1.95 - 12.50,p值<0.001)。

结论

单独的HbA1c或GA不能可靠地检测PLWH中的血糖异常。用于糖尿病前期的较低GA临界值(12.42%)提高了敏感性,但仍不理想。建议采用结合FPG的联合方法来提高该人群中糖尿病前期和糖尿病筛查的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验