Global Health and Lifestyles Research Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Palma, Spain.
CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 28;14:1233312. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1233312. eCollection 2023.
Numerous studies have shown the beneficial effects of exercise on glycemic control in people with prediabetes. However, the most effective exercise modality for improving glycemic control remains unclear. We aimed to assess which exercise training modality is most effective in improving glycemic control in a population with prediabetes.
We conducted searches in Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, PEDro, BVS, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 2022. Included studies reported fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and 2-hour postprandial (2hPP) levels and implemented an exercise program lasting at least 12 weeks in adults with prediabetes. We performed a direct meta-analysis using a random-effects model and a network meta-analysis. Cochran's Q statistic and the inconsistency I test were used to assess the heterogenicity between studies.
Twenty trials were included, with 15 trials (comprising 775 participants with prediabetes) combined in the meta-analysis, and 13 in the network meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results did not show a statistically significant reduction in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) after aerobic training (AT) intervention compared to a control group (mean (95%CI) difference = -5.18 (-13.48; 3.12) mg/dL, Z=1.22, p=0.22). However, a difference of -7.25 (-13.79; -0.71) mg/dL, p=0.03, in FPG after interval training (IT) intervention was detected compared to a control group. After resistance training (RT) intervention, FPG was significantly lower -6.71 (-12.65,-0.77) mg/dL, Z=2.21, p=0.03, and HbA1c by -0.13 (-0.55, 0.29), p=0.54, compared to the control group. The impact of RT compared to no intervention on 2hPP was not statistically significant (p=0.26). The network meta-analysis did not show statistical significance. Most of the studies presented an unclear risk of bias, and a low and very low-quality of evidence. According to the GRADE criteria, the strength of the body of evidence was low.
Resistance training and IT had demonstrated benefits on glycemic indices, especially on FPG, in a population with prediabetes. Further studies with larger sample sizes and a more robust methodology that compare different types of exercise modalities, frequencies, and durations, are needed to establish a beneficial exercise intervention.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=370688, identifier CRD42022370688.
许多研究表明运动对糖尿病前期患者的血糖控制有益。然而,改善血糖控制最有效的运动方式仍不清楚。我们旨在评估哪种运动训练方式在糖尿病前期人群中最能有效改善血糖控制。
我们在 Pubmed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、SPORTDiscus、Web of Science、PEDro、BVS 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了检索,检索时间从建库至 2022 年 6 月。纳入的研究报告了空腹血糖(FPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和 2 小时餐后(2hPP)水平,并在糖尿病前期成年人中实施了至少持续 12 周的运动方案。我们使用随机效应模型进行了直接荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析。Cochran's Q 统计量和不一致性 I 检验用于评估研究之间的异质性。
共纳入 20 项试验,其中 15 项试验(包括 775 名糖尿病前期患者)纳入荟萃分析,13 项试验纳入网络荟萃分析。荟萃分析结果显示,与对照组相比,有氧运动(AT)干预后空腹血糖(FPG)无统计学显著降低(平均差值(95%CI)=-5.18(-13.48;3.12)mg/dL,Z=1.22,p=0.22)。然而,与对照组相比,间歇训练(IT)干预后 FPG 降低了-7.25(-13.79;-0.71)mg/dL,p=0.03。与对照组相比,阻力训练(RT)干预后 FPG 显著降低-6.71(-12.65;-0.77)mg/dL,Z=2.21,p=0.03,HbA1c 降低-0.13(-0.55;0.29),p=0.54。与对照组相比,RT 对 2hPP 的影响无统计学意义(p=0.26)。网络荟萃分析没有显示统计学意义。大多数研究的偏倚风险不明确,证据质量为低到极低。根据 GRADE 标准,证据体的强度为低。
在糖尿病前期人群中,阻力训练和 IT 对血糖指标,尤其是 FPG,均显示出有益效果。需要进一步开展具有更大样本量和更稳健方法的研究,比较不同类型的运动方式、频率和持续时间,以确定有益的运动干预措施。
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=370688,标识符 CRD42022370688。