• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过扩展的技术接受框架对职前教师采用大语言模型的情况进行建模。

Modeling teacher education students' adoption of large language models through an extended technology acceptance framework.

作者信息

Gong Yulin, Xu Chengshu, Luo Suwen, Lin Jiaxin

机构信息

China Institute of Rural Education Development, Northeast Normal University, Changchun City, 130024, China.

Stanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Stanford University, Palo Alto, 94305, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 1;15(1):32208. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03298-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-03298-9
PMID:40890159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12402459/
Abstract

With the deepening integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the education sector, large language models (LLMs) have become essential tools for supporting writing tasks. As the future backbone of the teaching profession, the acceptance of these technologies by teacher education students not only influences their professional development but also plays a critical role in the digital transformation of future educational practices. However, existing research has yet to fully uncover the underlying mechanisms and influencing factors driving technology adoption behaviors within this group. This study extends the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) by incorporating key variables such as learning motivation, perceived risks, self-efficacy, and usage experience. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), we analyzed survey data from 552 fourth-year teacher education students in China to test the proposed hypotheses. The empirical findings reveal that subjective norms are the strongest predictor of behavioral intention, while perceived ease of use significantly and positively influences attitudes toward using LLMs. Among the risk dimensions, perceived time risk exerts a significant negative effect on perceived usefulness, whereas perceived privacy risk negatively impacts perceived ease of use. Additionally, usage experience fosters technology adoption behaviors by enhancing learning motivation. These findings not only extend the application boundaries of the TAM within the field of educational technology but also provide empirical evidence for educational institutions to design technology training programs and for model developers to optimize user experiences. Furthermore, they offer a theoretical framework for building digital literacy training systems for teacher education students.

摘要

随着人工智能(AI)技术在教育领域的深度融合,大语言模型(LLMs)已成为支持写作任务的重要工具。作为未来教师职业的中坚力量,教师教育专业学生对这些技术的接受程度不仅影响他们的职业发展,而且在未来教育实践的数字化转型中也起着关键作用。然而,现有研究尚未充分揭示驱动该群体技术采用行为的潜在机制和影响因素。本研究通过纳入学习动机、感知风险、自我效能感和使用经验等关键变量,扩展了技术接受模型(TAM)。我们使用结构方程模型(SEM)分析了来自中国552名大四教师教育专业学生的调查数据,以检验所提出的假设。实证结果表明,主观规范是行为意向的最强预测因素,而感知易用性对使用大语言模型的态度有显著的正向影响。在风险维度中,感知时间风险对感知有用性有显著的负向影响,而感知隐私风险对感知易用性有负向影响。此外,使用经验通过增强学习动机促进技术采用行为。这些发现不仅扩展了技术接受模型在教育技术领域的应用边界,而且为教育机构设计技术培训项目以及模型开发者优化用户体验提供了实证依据。此外,它们还为构建教师教育专业学生的数字素养培训系统提供了理论框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e740/12402459/b52ab1275b69/41598_2025_3298_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e740/12402459/da2ee629a1ae/41598_2025_3298_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e740/12402459/27bbbb531f5d/41598_2025_3298_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e740/12402459/b52ab1275b69/41598_2025_3298_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e740/12402459/da2ee629a1ae/41598_2025_3298_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e740/12402459/27bbbb531f5d/41598_2025_3298_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e740/12402459/b52ab1275b69/41598_2025_3298_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling teacher education students' adoption of large language models through an extended technology acceptance framework.通过扩展的技术接受框架对职前教师采用大语言模型的情况进行建模。
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 1;15(1):32208. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03298-9.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
User Intent to Use DeepSeek for Health Care Purposes and Their Trust in the Large Language Model: Multinational Survey Study.用户将DeepSeek用于医疗保健目的的意图及其对大语言模型的信任:跨国调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 26;12:e72867. doi: 10.2196/72867.
4
Impact of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of humanoid robots on students' intention to use.类人机器人的感知易用性和感知有用性对学生使用意愿的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Aug;258:105217. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105217. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
5
From acceptance to implementation: student speech-language pathologists' perspectives on using digital technologies in practice.从接受到应用:学生言语病理学家对在实践中使用数字技术的看法。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Feb 27:1-15. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2025.2472262.
6
Large language models and GenAI in education: Insights from Nigerian in-service teachers through a hybrid ANN-PLS-SEM approach.教育中的大语言模型和生成式人工智能:尼日利亚在职教师通过混合人工神经网络-偏最小二乘法-结构方程模型方法得出的见解
F1000Res. 2025 Mar 4;14:258. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.161637.1. eCollection 2025.
7
Understanding older adults' adoption of facial recognition payment: An integrated model of TAM and UXT.理解老年人对面部识别支付的采用:技术接受模型与用户体验理论的整合模型
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 10;20(7):e0325291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325291. eCollection 2025.
8
An extension of Trust and TAM model with TPB in the adoption of digital payment: An empirical study in Vietnam.信任与技术接受模型(TAM)与计划行为理论(TPB)相结合在数字支付采用中的扩展:越南的实证研究。
F1000Res. 2025 Apr 14;14:127. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.157763.2. eCollection 2025.
9
Key factors influencing undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of the use of learning management systems: a systematic literature review.影响本科护理专业学生对学习管理系统使用认知的关键因素:一项系统文献综述
BMC Nurs. 2025 Mar 26;24(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02962-9.
10
Enabling by voice: an exploratory study on how interactive smart agents (ISAs) can change the design of environmental control (EC) equipment and service.语音启用:关于交互式智能代理(ISA)如何改变环境控制(EC)设备及服务设计的探索性研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Jul 23:1-30. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2025.2530195.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the effectiveness of large language models in abstract screening: a comparative analysis.评估大型语言模型在摘要筛选中的有效性:一项对比分析。
Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 21;13(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02609-x.
2
Using an Instagram campaign to influence knowledge, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intentions for sustainable behaviors.利用Instagram活动来影响可持续行为的知识、主观规范、感知行为控制和行为意图。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 31;15:1377211. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1377211. eCollection 2024.
3
Training and Technology Acceptance of ChatGPT in University Students of Social Sciences: A Netcoincidental Analysis.
社会科学专业大学生对ChatGPT的培训与技术接受度:一项网络巧合分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 18;14(7):612. doi: 10.3390/bs14070612.
4
An explanatory study of factors influencing engagement in AI education at the K-12 Level: an extension of the classic TAM model.K-12 阶段人工智能教育参与影响因素的解释性研究:经典 TAM 模型的扩展。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 17;14(1):13922. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64363-3.
5
Extended TAM based acceptance of AI-Powered ChatGPT for supporting metacognitive self-regulated learning in education: A mixed-methods study.基于扩展技术接受模型的人工智能驱动的ChatGPT在教育中支持元认知自我调节学习的接受度:一项混合方法研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 9;10(8):e29317. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29317. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
6
Association of reviewer experience with discriminating human-written versus ChatGPT-written abstracts.评价者经验与区分人工撰写与 ChatGPT 撰写摘要的关联。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 May 6;34(5):669-674. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005162.
7
Comparisons of Quality, Correctness, and Similarity Between ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Abstracts for Basic Research: Cross-Sectional Study.ChatGPT 生成的和人工撰写的基础研究摘要在质量、正确性和相似性方面的比较:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 25;25:e51229. doi: 10.2196/51229.
8
To use or not to use? Understanding doctoral students' acceptance of ChatGPT in writing through technology acceptance model.使用还是不使用?通过技术接受模型理解博士生在写作中对ChatGPT的接受情况。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 26;14:1259531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259531. eCollection 2023.
9
Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT.ChatGPT生成的文献引用中的编造与错误。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 7;13(1):14045. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5.
10
From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing.从人类写作到人工智能生成的文本:审视ChatGPT在学术写作中的前景与潜在威胁。
Biol Sport. 2023 Apr;40(2):615-622. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623. Epub 2023 Mar 15.