• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转移性乳腺癌保乳手术与乳房切除术的生存情况:一项倾向评分匹配研究

Survival Between Mastectomy and Breast-Conserving Surgery in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

作者信息

Hong Yi-Yan, Zhan Hong-Liang, Li Guan-Qiao, Chen Qiu-Yan, Wu San-Gang, Zhang Fu-Xing

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.

Department of Breast Surgery, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University (Hainan General Hospital), Haikou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Invest Surg. 2025 Dec;38(1):2550774. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2025.2550774. Epub 2025 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1080/08941939.2025.2550774
PMID:40891078
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes between mastectomy (MAST) and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with dnMBC between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively included. The chi-square test, binomial logistic regression, propensity score matching (PSM), Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox proportional analysis were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 7880 patients were identified, including 2248 (28.5%) patients who underwent BCS and 5632 (71.5%) had achieved MAST. Although no statistically significant difference was found ( = 0.182), patients receiving MAST had a decreasing trend in later years. There were 74.3% ( = 629) of patients receiving MAST in 2010 and 68.5% ( = 366) in 2020. Younger age, advanced tumor stage, and advanced nodal stage were independent predictors of receiving MAST. There were 466 pairs of patients who were completely matched using PSM. The 3-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was 72.4% and 73.0% in patients treated with BCS and MAST, respectively ( = 0.509). The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 68.4% and 70.5% in patients treated with BCS and MAST, respectively ( = 0.702). The multivariate prognostic analyses showed that MAST had a similar BCSS ( = 0.996) and OS ( = 0.784) than those in BCS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that BCS and MAST yield similar survival outcomes in dnMBC.

摘要

目的

比较转移性乳腺癌(dnMBC)患者接受乳房切除术(MAST)和保乳手术(BCS)后的结局。

方法

回顾性纳入2010年至2020年间诊断为dnMBC的患者。采用卡方检验、二项逻辑回归、倾向得分匹配(PSM)、Kaplan-Meier法和多变量Cox比例分析进行统计分析。

结果

共纳入7880例患者,其中2248例(28.5%)接受了BCS,5632例(71.5%)接受了MAST。尽管未发现统计学显著差异(P = 0.182),但接受MAST的患者在后期呈下降趋势。2010年接受MAST的患者为74.3%(n = 629),2020年为68.5%(n = 366)。年龄较小、肿瘤分期较晚和淋巴结分期较晚是接受MAST的独立预测因素。使用PSM完全匹配了466对患者。接受BCS和MAST治疗的患者3年乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)分别为72.4%和73.0%(P = 0.509)。接受BCS和MAST治疗的患者3年总生存率(OS)分别为68.4%和70.5%(P = 0.702)。多变量预后分析显示,MAST的BCSS(P = 0.996)和OS(P = 0.784)与BCS组相似。

结论

我们的研究表明,BCS和MAST在dnMBC患者中产生相似的生存结局。

相似文献

1
Survival Between Mastectomy and Breast-Conserving Surgery in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.转移性乳腺癌保乳手术与乳房切除术的生存情况:一项倾向评分匹配研究
J Invest Surg. 2025 Dec;38(1):2550774. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2025.2550774. Epub 2025 Sep 1.
2
The prognostic differences between breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma who achieved complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a propensity score matched analysis based on the SEER database.新辅助化疗后达到完全缓解的浸润性导管癌患者保乳手术与乳房切除术的预后差异:基于监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据库的倾向评分匹配分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 8;23(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03932-w.
3
Comparing irradiated clinical outcomes between modified radical mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery in patients with pathologic stage III breast cancer: A national population-based match cohort study.病理分期为III期乳腺癌患者改良根治术与保乳手术的放疗临床结果比较:一项基于全国人群的匹配队列研究。
Surgery. 2025 Jul 15;185:109539. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109539.
4
Survival comparison of breast conserving therapy and mastectomy with breast reconstruction for breast cancer using propensity score matched cohort.使用倾向评分匹配队列对乳腺癌保乳治疗与乳房切除加乳房重建的生存比较。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 19;15(1):30310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16215-x.
5
Additional radiotherapy to breast-conserving surgery is an optional treatment for de novo stage IV breast cancer: A population-based analysis.保乳手术后追加放疗是新诊断 IV 期乳腺癌的一种可选治疗方法:基于人群的分析。
Cancer Med. 2021 Mar;10(5):1634-1643. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3751. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
6
Mastectomy Alone or with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Trend, Precipitating Factors, Patients Reported Outcome, and Oncologic Safety Analysis with and without Propensity Score Matching from 3759 Mastectomy Patients.单纯乳房切除术或即刻乳房重建术:3759例乳房切除患者倾向得分匹配前后的趋势、促成因素、患者报告结局及肿瘤学安全性分析
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Mar 6. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04762-7.
7
A nomogram to predict the benefit of postmastectomy radiotherapy in breast cancer with nodal micrometastases.一种用于预测腋窝微转移乳腺癌患者保乳术后放疗获益的列线图。
Breast Cancer. 2025 May 7. doi: 10.1007/s12282-025-01717-3.
8
Survival impact of adjuvant radiotherapy in early stage low risk elderly male breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving surgery.保乳手术治疗的早期低风险老年男性乳腺癌患者辅助放疗的生存影响
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 24;15(1):31108. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17083-1.
9
Long-Term Oncologic Outcome of Breast-Conserving Treatment in Patients With Breast Cancer With BRCA Variants.携带BRCA基因变异的乳腺癌患者保乳治疗的长期肿瘤学结局
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e259840. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9840.
10
Development and validation of novel machine learning-based prognostic models and propensity score matching for comparison of surgical approaches in mucinous breast cancer.基于新型机器学习的预后模型的开发与验证以及倾向评分匹配用于黏液性乳腺癌手术方法比较
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 3;16:1557858. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1557858. eCollection 2025.