• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在腹疝修补术中,采用一期筋膜缝合可降低复发率和补片膨出:PROSECO随机临床试验

Recurrence rate and mesh bulging are reduced with primary fascial closure in ventral hernia repair: the PROSECO randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Lindmark Mikael, Tall Jael, Darkahi Bahman, Österberg Johanna, Strigård Karin, Thorell Anders, Gunnarsson Ulf

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Skellefteå Research Unit, Skellefteå, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2025 Sep 2;112(9). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf169.

DOI:10.1093/bjs/znaf169
PMID:40893041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12404345/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair using a bridging technique has shown high rates of hernia site complications. Primary fascial closure before mesh placement has been utilized to address this. This randomized, parallel, double-blind, multicentre controlled trial investigated whether primary fascial closure reduces hernia site complications.

METHODS

Adults undergoing laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for a midline hernia were randomized to primary fascial closure or bridging. Clinical assessment and the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire were completed preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months post-surgery. CT scans were performed pre- and 12 months post-surgery. It was hypothesized that non-resorbable suture closure would reduce complication rates from 30% to 13% at 12 months, requiring 180 patients for 80% power and 95% significance.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-two patients were randomized (97 closure, 95 bridging), with 173 (90%) completing 1-year follow-up. At 12 months, overall hernia site complication rates showed no significant difference clinically (18% versus 20%, P = 0.85) or on CT (25% versus 28%, P = 0.50). However, recurrence and mesh bulging were significantly lower with fascial closure (4% versus 20%, P = 0.006). This group also reported significantly less pain at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Although there was no difference in the primary endpoint, fascial closure resulted in significantly lower rates of recurrence and mesh bulging, along with reduced postoperative pain. These findings suggest that primary fascial closure should be recommended alongside intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair in midline hernias.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at the ISRCTN at the start of the trial (ISRCTN51495042).

摘要

背景

采用桥接技术的腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补术已显示出较高的疝部位并发症发生率。在放置补片前进行一期筋膜缝合已被用于解决这一问题。这项随机、平行、双盲、多中心对照试验研究了一期筋膜缝合是否能降低疝部位并发症。

方法

接受腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补中线疝的成年人被随机分为一期筋膜缝合组或桥接组。术前以及术后3个月和12个月完成临床评估和腹疝疼痛问卷。术前和术后12个月进行CT扫描。假设不可吸收缝线缝合可将12个月时的并发症发生率从30%降至13%,需要180名患者才能达到80%的检验效能和95%的显著性水平。

结果

192名患者被随机分组(97名缝合组,95名桥接组),173名(90%)完成了1年随访。在12个月时,总体疝部位并发症发生率在临床(18%对20%,P = 0.85)或CT检查中(25%对28%,P = 0.50)均无显著差异。然而,筋膜缝合组的复发和补片膨出明显更低(4%对20%,P = 0.006)。该组在12个月时报告的疼痛也明显更少。

结论

虽然主要终点无差异,但筋膜缝合导致复发和补片膨出率显著降低,同时术后疼痛减轻。这些发现表明,在中线疝的腹膜内补片修补术中应推荐一期筋膜缝合。

试验注册

该试验在试验开始时在国际标准随机对照试验编号注册库注册(ISRCTN51495042)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1f6/12404345/542e934894fb/znaf169f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1f6/12404345/542e934894fb/znaf169f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1f6/12404345/542e934894fb/znaf169f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Recurrence rate and mesh bulging are reduced with primary fascial closure in ventral hernia repair: the PROSECO randomized clinical trial.在腹疝修补术中,采用一期筋膜缝合可降低复发率和补片膨出:PROSECO随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 2025 Sep 2;112(9). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf169.
2
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: early follow-up of a randomized controlled study of primary fascial closure before mesh placement.腹腔镜下腹膜疝修补术:网片放置前原发性筋膜闭合的随机对照研究的早期随访。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad434.
3
Primary fascial closure with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: systematic review.腹腔镜腹疝修补术的一期筋膜关闭:系统评价
World J Surg. 2014 Dec;38(12):3097-104. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2722-9.
4
Transfascial Fixation vs No Fixation for Open Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repairs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经腹筋膜固定与非固定治疗开放型腹横肌后腹疝修补术:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Aug 1;158(8):789-795. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1786.
5
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
6
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
7
IPOM plus versus IPOM standard in incisional hernia repair: results of a prospective multicenter trial.IPOM 加强修补术与 IPOM 标准修补术治疗切口疝的前瞻性多中心随机对照研究
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):695-704. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02802-2. Epub 2023 May 7.
8
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜技术与开放技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.
9
Mesh-reinforced compared with primary closure in emergent laparotomies for incarcerated ventral incisional hernias: Is the added complexity justified?在急诊剖腹手术治疗嵌顿性腹直肌切口疝中,与一期缝合相比,使用补片加强修补:增加的复杂性是否合理?
Surgery. 2025 Sep;185:109536. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109536. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
10
The safety of polypropylene mesh in repairing incarcerated or strangulated hernias with organ resection.聚丙烯网片在伴有器官切除的嵌顿性或绞窄性疝修补术中的安全性。
Hernia. 2025 Apr 22;29(1):147. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03314-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Adhesions After Laparoscopic IPOM-How Serious Is the Problem?腹腔镜下腹腔内补片植入术后粘连——问题有多严重?
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Mar 26;4:14126. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14126. eCollection 2025.
2
Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) with fascial repair (IPOM-plus) for ventral and incisional hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)联合筋膜修复术(IPOM-plus)治疗腹疝和切口疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):385-400. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02983-4. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
3
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: early follow-up of a randomized controlled study of primary fascial closure before mesh placement.
腹腔镜下腹膜疝修补术:网片放置前原发性筋膜闭合的随机对照研究的早期随访。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad434.
4
Fascial Defect Closure During Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.腹疝修补术中筋膜缺损的闭合:随机对照试验的系统评价
HCA Healthc J Med. 2023 Aug 29;4(4):267-278. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1469. eCollection 2023.
5
Fascial defect closure versus bridged repair in laparoscopic ventral hernia mesh repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜腹疝补片修补术中筋膜缺损闭合与桥接修复的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1473-1481. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02533-2. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
6
Patient-reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair.切口疝修补术后的患者报告结局。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1677-1684. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02477-7. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
7
Surgeon Volume and Risk of Reoperation after Laparoscopic Primary Ventral Hernia Repair: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.腹腔镜原发性腹疝修补术后再次手术风险与外科医生手术量的关系:一项全国范围内基于登记的研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Sep;233(3):346-356.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.05.023. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
8
Closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜脐疝修补术中筋膜缺损的关闭:一项随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2020 Feb;107(3):200-208. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11490.
9
Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society.欧洲疝学会和美洲疝学会关于脐疝和腹疝治疗的指南。
Br J Surg. 2020 Feb;107(3):171-190. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11489. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
10
Primary Fascial Closure During Minimally Invasive Ventral Hernia Repair.微创腹疝修补术中的一期筋膜缝合
JAMA Surg. 2020 Mar 1;155(3):256-257. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5088.